The New Orleans school district and United States government used money to entice organizations to build and run charter schools for multiple reasons, but the most prominent justification of charter schools was the competition that comes with them. The principle argument is that competition between charter schools, in respect to enrollment and overall yearly progress, would in turn increase school quality, safety, and student satisfaction (Hutchinson, Ferrell, Broussard, Brown, & Chrestman, 2014). The district and government believed that charter schools would bring equity for the diverse population of New Orleans. “Rather than promoting education equity, [charter school reform] provides a means for … entrepreneurs to raid the public schools treasury and create new markets at the expense of the poor,” (Dixson, Buras, & Jeffers, 2015, p.
The New Orleans school district and United States government used money to entice organizations to build and run charter schools for multiple reasons, but the most prominent justification of charter schools was the competition that comes with them. The principle argument is that competition between charter schools, in respect to enrollment and overall yearly progress, would in turn increase school quality, safety, and student satisfaction (Hutchinson, Ferrell, Broussard, Brown, & Chrestman, 2014). The district and government believed that charter schools would bring equity for the diverse population of New Orleans. “Rather than promoting education equity, [charter school reform] provides a means for … entrepreneurs to raid the public schools treasury and create new markets at the expense of the poor,” (Dixson, Buras, & Jeffers, 2015, p.