1. Briefly summarize Jones’s essay, including her main idea and purpose. Jones’s essay explains that people think about their decisions before making it is important, because it can mess up their life if they don’t plan for it. The purpose of the article is to warn people think carefully before they make decisions. 2.…
1. Wolf thinks one should not aim to be as morally good as possible because one does not pursue non-moral virtues and is not well-rounded. To be a moral saint, one lives by their moral virtues at the cost of not cultivating any non-moral virtues. A moral saint is one who acts as morally good as possible. In order to be a moral saint, one permits all moral virtues and inhibits non-moral virtues.…
To persuade his audience Paul Bogard uses a cause and effect structure. He builds the argument of people not giving dark light the credit it deserves early in the selection . Bogard uses some of his experiences as a way to connect with the audience . He states " Today,though, when we feel the closeness of nightfall, we reach quickly for a light switch . " This applies to many of the audience and makes them re-think the way they see darkness.…
What is a Logical Fallacy, Exactly? The word "fallacy" comes from the Latin "fallacia" which means "deception, deceit, trick, artifice," however, a more specific meaning in logic (a logical fallacy) that dates back to the 1550s means "false syllogism, invalid argumentation." http://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/2016/?adv=Donald+Trump%E2%80%99s+Argument+for+America In this ad “Trump Argument for America” supported by Trump campaign was published on November 06 2016.…
The world of semantics is dominated by two types of naming theories: descriptivist and causal. Defenders of these two theories seem to discredit each other, thinking the world of semantics must choose one or the other. I, however, do not believe this has to be the case. In this essay I will argue that parts of descriptivist and causal theories of names can come together to create a better overall theory of names: a hybrid theory. I will do this by looking at the argument Gareth Evans makes in his article, “the Causal Theory of Names”.…
Despite the influx of information regarding the causes of autism, and whether it is genetic or environmental (Nature versus nurture) autism is still widely debated. First I 'm going to discuss what nature versus nurture is, and its findings toward autism research. Following this I will also explain Twin Studies are, and their significance towards the research of autism. Last but not least I will give my opinion on the subject matter, and where I believe autism lies in this debate of nature versus nurture. The father of this idea of nature versus nurture is John Locke, which he writes about in his book "Some Thoughts Concerning Education".…
Question 2: In his Aristotle’s Categories, he presents the thesis, “if the primary substances did not exist, neither could any of the other things exist (2b7-8).” By this, Aristotle means that there are two categories of substances--primary substances and secondary substances. Readers must keep in mind, however, that the qualifiers of primary and secondary were only added for clarification purposes. The term I will soon define as primary substances is what Aristotle is referring to when he says substances.…
The conflict between free will, causality and laws of nature is that free will is based on thinking and making decisions for yourself based on your actions, the term causality is more of a cause and effect in a different event, and laws of nature is to determine a person’s social and personal nature that requires the rights or values that the person goes by for…
Aristotle’s Four Causes in Science Explanation is basic human nature. It began as a way to pass blame onto another person, then onto God or gods. This changed with the ideas of Archimedes of Syracuse. Archimedes was a mathematician, physicist, and inventor who was responsible for the discovery of buoyancy and the invention of both the siege engine and screw pump. After his discoveries, the popular view on explanation was modified.…
What is intelligent design? How does it differ from other contemporary origin theories? Intelligent design is the relatively young theory of how there may be more to the origin of our, and every, species then just a collection of random chaotic event. Darwin insisted in his theory of natural of natural selection; that individuals, amongst various species, with optimal survival traits would outlast and thrive in contrast to those with less beneficial traits. Lamarck, father of evolution theory, would have believed these traits would have been slowly formed due to necessity and bred down through generations.…
Scientists form a conjecture that if true would explain observed phenomena. The theory should be bold, and the predictions it makes should be clearly falsifiable. 2. The theory should then be subject to harsh testing in an attempt to prove the theory false. 3.…
In order to explain something, we need evidence, however; this evidence cannot support itself without other evidence; henceforth, we gain this evidence through the…
In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…
Causality is the structure of cause and effect, the relationship completely. For A must come before B, A being the cause and B the effect. This is one of the necessary conditions that need to be met, for causation to be applicable. At least three, need to be met altogether, such as temporal priority over cause and effect, and continuity. These conditions also have to happen at the same time, or it is not credible.…
Critical realism focuses around the anti-positivist philosophy of science established by Roy Bhaskar and has challenged some of the core theories associated with political explanation and science. One of the main contributions of critical realism is its focus on causal analysis, which as a contested concept, has challenged twentieth-century thoughts about political science and further International Relations, thus challenging the positivist thinking associated with the era. Critical realism challenges conventional notions of causal analysis within politics and social sciences. This essay will focus around the key theorists associated with critical realism and the use of causal analysis, further analysing how these contributions have challenged…