Primary Substance In Aristotle's Categories

Improved Essays
Question 2:
In his Aristotle’s Categories, he presents the thesis, “if the primary substances did not exist, neither could any of the other things exist (2b7-8).” By this, Aristotle means that there are two categories of substances--primary substances and secondary substances. Readers must keep in mind, however, that the qualifiers of primary and secondary were only added for clarification purposes. The term I will soon define as primary substances is what Aristotle is referring to when he says substances. Therefore, the following is the best way to rationalize his thesis that if substances didn’t exist then nothing would exist.
Aristotle believes that primary substances cannot be derived from anything nor can they be found in anything; they
…show more content…
For example, the big bang had to be caused by something but the explanation eludes us. A person or thing needed to change in order for the Big Bang to happen but human’s may never know what or who caused it. Likewise, if you look at Aristotle’s four types of aition, they are occurrences that must take place for the object at hand to exist. Let us examine some of the forms of aition and determine which word is more appropriate. Firstly, the material aition of something is the thing that allows the object to exist. For instance, the material aition of the table is the wood. Is the wood the cause or the explanation of the table? According to both colloquial English and Merriam Webster, the wood is the cause, or, the reason for the condition the wood found itself in--not the explanation, which is defined as the act of showing the reason for something. Without the existence of the wood, the table wouldn’t exist, connoting a causal relationship. Yet, without an explanation of how the table came to exist, the table would still exist. Therefore, aition means cause in this case. Secondly, the formal aition of something can also be defined as the plan or blueprint. When a house is built, the blueprint is the cause, or reason, that the rooms are the way they are. A blueprint can also be an explanation, because the homeowner can refer back to it to check dimensions or describe the layout to a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill were two famous philosophers known for their studies in politics. Aristotle believes the best form of government is a polis, while Mill believes a more laid back structure is better. He believes the people should be ruled by the harm principles. Although they have very different ideas on how the people should be ruled, there are many similarities between the two. Aristotle was a great philosopher from the BC era.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Aristotle

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Founders of the United States, in their lists of dependable and confident political philosophers, frequently included Aristotle. Some of the Founders, especially, John Adams and James Wilson, often refer to Aristotle and show an admiration for his Politics. By the “rule of law”, Adams and the Founders did not comprehend the simple consistency or predictability of law and procedure (Pakaluk, Michael). He was recognized as the original source for many policies, mostly declared by the Founders. Some of which include: “1.…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, as the Thing made its presence, the expression of it…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leibniz’s writings, Discourse on Metaphysics , he upheld the view that final causes are everywhere and to not notice them, but believe in God is ridiculous. Since as we know, Leibniz believed that God created the best possible world for us. Now getting to my point, I would like to effectively defend Leibniz against Descartes because in his writings, Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes rejects final causes. First, I will explain what the connection between final causes and efficient causes is and how Leibniz believed it was ignorant of people to study one and judge the other and vice versa. Then I will explain how Descartes rejection of final causation is what created weakness in his argument in meditation 4 .…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated before Aristotle was a master of categorizing, and during this chapter Heinrichs takes time to discuss Aristotle’s most valuable ideas: the division of…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle made the distinction between real and apparent goods to explain how some goods are below others. Things like pleasure can be selfish because it often involves doing things that one individual benefits from, whereas the things in life that bring people true happiness involve others. An apparent good, is something that involves a mistake in reason leading us to believe that an action or behavior may be good but it actually isn’t. Apparent goods fulfill our wishes and are thought to be good because we want them.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s Ethics Book I obtains copious themes and ideas relevant to classical political theory. One of the most abundant motifs is happiness and how it impacts humans of all stages. As seen in this book, happiness is not always clear cut; therefore, the ability of humans to achieve this marvel of completeness is often disputed. While virtue and honor are acceptable candidates for this vague idea, happiness must be the good. We only strive for these attributes in order to make ourselves happy; thus, happiness is good (Aristotle, 2002, p. 3).…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Posterior Analytics The Posterior Analytics is a text from Aristotle 's Organon that deals with demonstration, definition, and scientific knowledge. In book 1 chapter 3 he discusses two different views on if know ledge which he says neither of these views are either true or necessary. In the first view that is discussed Aristotle says “Some people think that because [knowledge through demonstration] requires knowledge of the primary things, there is no knowledge;” By this he is saying that some people assume that there is no knowledge at all. By this thinking we would face an infinite regress.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to gain a better understanding of how truth is discovered rather than manufactured, one must examine the philosophy of Plato. A quintessential concept in Plato’s philosophy is the idea of being versus Being. In Plato’s Republic, the philosopher claims that there are two different realms within reality: the visible world of being, and the intelligible world of Being. In the world of Being, there exists what Plato calls the Forms. The Forms are Plato’s First Principle; he claims that the Forms are perfect, eternal, and non-changing objects in the intelligible realm, and these are the essences of the physical world; these are how things ought to be (INCLUDE CITATIONS).…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spinoza's Argument

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin, all substances are unique from the other and there are…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle takes it that bodies (more specifically, natural bodies), which are taken to have life in them, are generally considered substances (Aristotle 412a12-14). More strictly speaking, a body that has life in it is a substance in the third sense—they body is a compound (Aristotle 412a15). Here one might immediately question how or why it is that Aristotle’s distinction between substance as matter and form, and even more so how potentiality and actuality could apply to body and soul, in order to characterize living beings as the third composite understanding of substance. Granted, one the face of it, the application seems a bit implausible.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that anything attached to a substance that is not essential to its being a substance (e.g., a man being pale, a person being a male or female, etc.) shall be regarded as being an accidental feature. It is the first definition that will be applied (along with its contrary, e.g., that which is essential) to form, matter, and substance itself. The second definition given for accident simply says that certain things that are attached to a substance in virtue of itself (e.g., “two right angles attach[ed] to the triangle” 1025a31), but not essential for the substance to exist, shall be too regarded as…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The formal cause explains why a thing is that said thing, instead of another thing. This cause explains why something is that thing instead of being multiple things (48, 194b27). The formal cause represents the pattern, or design of the form of the thing. Aristotle better explains this with an example of a statue. The bronze is not the statue, yet the way the bronze is molded into the statue creates the formal cause of the statue (48, 194b5).…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Outline each cause individually and what aspect of the example is involved with each individual cause (i.e. the marble is involved with what cause).Explain to me how this represented Aristotle’s idea of how nature functioned and changed. Then, related this to his idea of the Unmoved Mover. How did the Unmoved Mover function, and why was it…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays