Musiclive Case

Decent Essays
b)
S4H posted a letter to Musiclive on 15th Septmer 2015 accepting their proposal to organize promotion activities. They also sent another letter to Promomusic informing them that they were unsuccessful and the letter arrived on the 16th. Due to a printing error in the postal code on the letter to Musiclive, the letter arrived two days later on the 7th. Immediately after posting the letter to Musiclive, S4H discovered that Musiclive had a marketing contract with one of its competitors and emailed them informing them that they no longer wished to proceed. On the same day they emailed Promomusic informing them they would like to proceed with the marketing contract but Promomusic did not see the email until after the letter had arrived. The issue
…show more content…
In Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean, the defendant offered to sell iron to the plaintiff through a telegram. After receiving the telegram the plaintiff sent a telegram to the defendant asking to accept the stated price for a duration of two months or the longest limit it would allow. The defendant did not respond to the telegram and sold the iron to another party on the same day. The defendant later sent a telegram to the plaintiff informing him that all the iron had been sold. Before the plaintiff received the telegram, he sent a telegram to the defendant accepting the offer. The plaintiff sued for non-delivery. The issue in this case is whether the defendant’s telegram effectively revoked the offer although it was not received by the plaintiff before he made the acceptance. The court held that a revocation is not effective until it is received by the person to whom the offer was made. Because the plaintiff had not received the revocation at the time he sent a telegram of acceptance, the original offer stood and the plain tiffs acceptance constituted a valid contract. The implication of this decision is that it is possible to post a letter of acceptance after a letter of revocation is posted but before it is received and the acceptance will form a valid contract as soon as it is posted. The postal rule does not apply to instantaneous communications such as emails for acceptance. In Entores Ltd v Miles, the court held that the rule of instantaneous communication is different from postal rule and a contract is made when the acceptance arrives. In such cases, a contract cannot be formed until the other party receives the acceptance. The postal rule is based on the principle of convenience where acceptance is considered complete when the letter is handed to the post

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hyder V Wrench Case Study

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This offer was rejected, and the plaintiff sought to accept the preliminary offer. It was held that no agreement was made as the underlying offer was ended by the counter-offer. Positive Acceptance mean acceptance must be positive and not passive. In other words the party accepting the agreement should suffer acknowledge an offer. He could not be considered to have accepted his…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiencek further argues that the trial court erred by considering “parol evidence to vary the effective date of the [B108 agreement] and to controvert the integration clause.” CHH, for its part, avers that the admission of parol evidence was proper because it was offered to determine whether the contract was effective. We hold that the circuit court did not violate the parole evidence rule because extrinsic evidence was not offered to add or modify any terms to the B108 agreement. Generally, parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of an integrated contract. Foreman v. Melrod, 257 Md. 435, 441 (1970) (“‘All prior and contemporaneous negotiations are merged in the written instrument, which is treated as the exclusive…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Third Party Beneficiary

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This is not allowed if the original contract prohibits assignments, or if it will substantially change the duty and risk to the obligor, or substantially reduce the value. Under an assignment, there will be the assignor, the one who is transferring the rights; the obligor, who is the other party; and the assignee, who is the recipient of the transfer. Article 9 of the U.C.C. governs assignment of any transaction that was for the creation of interest in personal property. Consideration is not a requirement for an assignment but a gratuitous assignment can be revoked, unless one of theses exceptions are present: it was in writing; novation occurred; the assignee receives the benefit prior to revocation; if the assignee will suffer a detriment; or if the tangible token was received.…

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legal Law Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is because a third party may contract a person otherwise under an existing legal duty to do the act so required. Usain is not an agent of Brie as he was given no authority to act on her behalf and was not purporting to, and is therefore a third party. 3. Certainty The contract is sufficiently certain as the essential terms including price are given. No party has discretion as to performance, and it is sufficiently clear for the courts to enforce.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ben promise to secure a US team which is sufficient consideration for the promise of payment by Ashley and vice versa. As illustrated by Chappell & Co Pty Ltd v Nestlé Co Ltd consideration have to be sufficient but not adequate. It could be argued that no consideration is provided for the promise to recompense BA if contract does not eventuate. The promise to secure a team would be past consideration which is not a valid consideration. Intention to create legal relations To form a contract two parties must give mutual consent that the agreement is legally enforceable.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, this rule does not apply to the given scenario between Percy and Reena, but in ‘Entores v Miles Far East Corp’ the rule was cited in order to support the development on what would constitute communication of acceptance where parties are in direct communications through ignoring the postal rule. As nowadays, the technology has developed and therefore the problem started when immediate communication was received as now these can be made indirectly through leaving messages via voice message or telex. As law has addressed if this would constitute a valid communication, in the case of Brinkibon the court has held similarly as in the ‘Entores v Miles Far East Corp’ in situation where instantaneous communication is, the contract is only complete when the acceptance is received by the offeror, and therefore the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is received. Applying this judgement to the scene between Percy and the Reena, we find that the decision of Reena that she does not wish to sell the car to Percy generated no receipt of the communication. As discussed under the case ‘Entores and Brinkibon’, there must have been a receipt of communication generated and therefore the attempt of Reena deciding that she does not wish to sell the car to Percy would not constitute a valid communication of acceptance of…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In some cases, the exclusion clause will not be treated valud, if the seller is misrepresenting the scope of the clause. Words of contract must be clear and unambigious, it must not create any doubt in customer/buyer mind. An example of an unsigned exclusion clause would be the clearly written sign right behind the phone chargers point that “If any mobile phone are lost or damaged University will not be responsible for any damage or loss caused.” “It is settled that no clause is effective unless adequately brought to other party attention before the time the contract is made (R.Lawson, 2011).” Talking about James chung, who is 18 now which means is at the age of majority parks his car to Sydney CBD at private parking. When he returns the stereo sound system is missing from his car and the management of the Car Parking denies repsonsbility as they have already show sign warning about ‘parking at owners risk’ at the entrance…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this case, it was held that because the claimant had communicated to the defendant the importance of the term; hops must have been treated without sulphur, and because the claimant relied on the statement, the hops had not been treated with sulphur, the claimant’s action for breach of a fundamental term was successful. The strength of the defendant’s assurance in Bannerman is analogous to E’s assurance. Using this line of reasoning, S would have an arguable claim that E’s statement and assurance, does, in fact, form a fundamental term and should warrant a breach whereby repudiation and damages are available. Regarding the extra money C paid to have the marquee installed, it may be advisable to C to ask the courts to imply a term in fact into the contract that was not expressly stated. That is, who should pay for extra costs if the land is not…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bob And Carl Case

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The acceptance cannot be revoked regardless of whether notification of revocation is delivered using a more direct method of communication. Posting of acceptance ultimately results in the formation of a contract and as such the offeree cannot unilaterally withdraw, without the agreement of the offeror. This view is represented by the case of Wenkheim v Arndt. If this approach is taken the acceptance cannot be revoked particularly since Carl was uninformed of Bob’s intention to withdraw, because he had ignored the message left on his messaging system. The second approach states that no contract is formed because the offeree has rejected the contract in the first formal communication with the offeror, although the acceptance letter was posted.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Defendant held the position that he had given ample notice of the termination of the Agreement through his initial letter and that he had the right to terminate the Agreement and lodge a counterclaim given the Claimant’s failure to make payment. QUESTIONS OF LAW/ISSUES The issues before the court are, as Underhill LJ stated in Paragraph 19: (a) Whether there was a notice in term in the facilities contract, and, if so, how long was the period of notice to which the claimant was entitled? (b) Was the claimant in fact given notice of…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays