The Obama Administration: An Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
A very debate-worthy topic during the Obama administration has been the question of whether or not carbon dioxide is a pollutant. The Obama administration has put together countless efforts to try and make this as clear as possible, with the EPA in 2009 stating that carbon dioxide is indeed a pollution. However, that has done nothing but increased the debate. I am going to try my best to approach this question from both a legal standpoint and from the view of a climate change advocate. So from a legal standpoint, I feel the appropriate first step should be to define a pollutant. A pollutant is defined as a substance that is released into the environment and has negative effects or degrades the usefulness of a resource. Immediately after reading …show more content…
Although it is common knowledge that excessive carbon dioxide emissions are a hazard to human health, there has been some disputation about whether carbon dioxide, a gas that is so natural, and valuable in our environment, can actually be a pollutant. In 2007, in a case between the state of Massachusetts and the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, the supreme court, stated that carbon dioxide did indeed fit the definition of a pollution. An argument I have heard a lot is that carbon dioxide is not toxic, so how could a non-toxic gas be a pollutant. My answer to this is incredibly simple, according to the definition, a pollutant is something that is harmful, and yes, carbon dioxide is not toxic, but a substance that is not poisonous can still be very harmful. An example is phosphorous, which is an essential plant fertilizer, it would take a lot of phosphorous to actually be poisoned, however excess phosphate is incredibly harmful in rivers in lakes. Phosphorous is thus, considered a pollution, which should be the same case for carbon …show more content…
An argument that is common for climate change deniers, is that carbon dioxide, is fertilizing the plants and agriculture, however, that point is moot, because it distracts from the point of carbon dioxide being incredibly harmful, and a pollutant in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is classified as a greenhouse gas. So if we as a society can accept the fact that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, why is it not clear to us that carbon dioxide is a pollutant? The greenhouse effect is a natural effect of gases trapping sun’s radiation in the atmosphere of the Earth. Yes, it is natural, the greenhouse effect is used to maintain the Earth’s temperature. However, when carbon dioxide is added to the atmosphere at such a rate, it creates a “heavier” trapping and causes more heat to be trapped in the atmosphere. So, again if carbon dioxide is clearly having a negative impact on the Earth of causing severe problems such as the warming of our planet, how could it possibly not be considered a pollutant. I have done extensive research of arguments against carbon dioxide being a pollutant, so I saw it due that I mitigated all of those arguments in this

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The natural occurrence of this certain temperature due to certain gasses in the atmosphere was later known as “the natural greenhouse effect”. Considering that earth’s temperature was influenced by carbon dioxide, Arrehenius and scientist Thomas Chamberlin later focused on carbon dioxide and the use of it with humans. They developed the concept that human activities could affect global warming by their excessive use of carbon dioxide that would soon contribute to a heating in earth’s temperature. Even though it was years ago when they first discovered that human activities are a large factor in contributing to global warming, many recent studies have shown and proven that this concept is true and the temperatures are increasing like never before. According to (“How is Today’s...” ,n.d), “the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The science behind Global Warming can be difficult to understand. In this paper, the scientific facts will be kept simple in order to accomplish the main goal of the paper. This paper has two goals, the first is to educate the reader on the effects Global Warming can have on the environment. The second, and more prominent, is arguing the question of whether suing on behalf of future generations should be allowed. It has been scientifically proven that the burning of fossil fuels harms the environment.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Geo-engineering is defined as the artificial modification of the Earth’s climate system. The carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing day-by-day, majority due to human activity. This is having negative effects on the climate and human beings. Researchers have created filtering machines to help reduce carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. Also, researchers are thinking of artificially enhancing the growth of phytoplankton; which absorb nearly the same rate of carbon dioxide from the ocean and the atmosphere as land plants do.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It has been defined as: “the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system, in order to moderate global warming" (The Royal Society, 2009). Geoengineers do not have to pitch the idea to a single region or nation, but to the world as a whole. This is why it becomes difficult to propose solutions. Over time two main streams of solutions have become topics of discussion in geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management, and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Implementation of climate engineering would support global mitigation and adaptation processes aimed at slowing climate change.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the carbon dioxide is kept too much in the atmosphere, it will be the increase of greenhouse gases, and the earth will become warmer. Jarred Skype (n.d), an environmental scientist, pointed out in his article, “The primary cause of environmental degradation is human disturbance. The degree of the environmental impact varies with the cause, the habitat, and the plants and animals that inhabit it”. Obviously, environmental degradation happens when people exploit and overuse the components of…

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Human Activities Affect Global Warming Do human activities affect climate change, and as a result create global warming? Some scientists say no, but the majority of scientists say yes. They say human activities such as deforestation, using hydro-carbons, and burning fossil fuels, cause a lot of carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere changing the temperature of the climate, causing global warming. So now which group of scientists is correct? Does human activity affect climate change causing global warming?…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this, I have always had the thought that if plants take up carbon dioxide, then planting more plants could help remove greenhouse gasses out of the air. Global warming is the theory of toxic fumes destroying the ozone layer and allowing more solar rays to pass through and get trapped heating up the earth. Plants, as part…

    • 2224 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is a main cause for climate change. Richard Spinrad, author of Our Deadened Carbon Soaked Seas, explains “Both the United States and Britain recognize that rising CO2 and the production of other greenhouse gases have widespread consequences and have called for strong action to reduce carbon emissions” (Spinrad). To reduce worldwide carbon emissions there needs to be an enforced global tax on carbon. For instance, Van Jones, a former CEO and environmental activist states, “Nobody should be allowed to pollute for free, the only people who have polluted for free are these mega polluters when it comes to carbon” (Jones). The carbon tax should be charged heavily to large corporations, who do the most…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Carbon Sequestration

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Carbon dioxide traps sunlight in the atmosphere which makes the earth warmer. The excess amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is a serious issue that causes global warming. Three solutions have been brought up to solve this problem and they include, decreasing human dependence of fossil fuels, using more renewable resources, and utilizing the process of carbon sequestration. II.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The climate and seasons go through natural changes also. “In general, climate changes prior to the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy, volcanic eruptions, and natural changes in greenhouse gas concentrations” (EPA). There are many economic, psychological, and even metaphysical reasons why some do not “believe” in climate change. Some think that the costs are too high to fix, that climate change consequences are horrible to think about, and that nothing bad is going to happen to our earth. People are in denial about what is actually occurring.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays