Essay On Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The Death of the Death Penalty The Death Penalty has been used for centuries. Ever since we’ve had a civilization it’s ways have changed over the years. Some acts of the Death Penalty have been brutal, such as Roman crucifixion, and have lent themselves to be infamous. We know that crucifixion had been the cause of death for Jesus of Nazareth. Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore. …show more content…
It leaves the victims family was a ending to the nightmare (Messerli). Our justice system nowadays, is too focused on the perpetrator’s rights. We must go back to what this entire thing was about, protecting the victim. The United States needs the Death Penalty to serve Justice to the those who cannot be changed for the better (Messerli). There are those who say that the innocence factor can make the Death Penalty, an irreversible but effective, punishment much too dangerous to be used. For the safety of those prisoners who might perhaps be innocent. (Dieter) The people who disagree with the Death Penalty because of the chance that an innocent claim that:
“The danger that innocent people will be executed because of errors in the criminal justice system is getting worse. A total of 69 people have been released from death row since 1973 after evidence of their innocence emerged. Twenty-one condemned inmates have been released since 1993, including seven from the state of Illinois alone. Many of these cases were discovered not because of the normal appeals process, but rather as a result of new scientific techniques, investigations by journalists, and the dedicated work of expert attorneys, not available to the typical death row inmate.” (Dieter)
Yet however, those opposed to the Death Penalty do not take into account our new

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In our society today, citizens see murder as something disgusting and as an act that goes against everyone’s morality. This is because we all live together and by seeing someone dead we all expect justice to be served and a criminal to be blamed for such a serious offence. Some crimes are not as serious as others, but if we want our society to continue running the way that it is we can’t have murders everywhere which is why we must do to them what they have done unto…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Certainly, Reiman’s moderate theory of retribution provides a pathway to abolishing the death penalty because many individuals that are given the death penalty are victims of an aggressive and overly reactionary criminal justice system. This is one way to argue in favor of removing the death penalty through Reiman’s argument on reactionary cycle of a “eye for an eye” mentality, which creates extreme judgments that cannot be overturned if the individual is later found to be innocent. Reiman is aware of the long tradition of the death penalty as a form of retributive justice, but he finds it impractical in terms of being an accurate judge of the intent and motives of the alleged…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Black men in 2010 was 44347 inmates per 100,000 and the rate of white men rate was 678 per 100,000 prisoners on death row. Finally, the death penalty is used for revenge. Death penalty is all unacceptable practice that sows vengeance and does not bring justice to victims of crimes. No matter how serious the crime, to kill a convicted person is an offense to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person, The death penalty can be used but only if this the only possible way for punishment. It also stresses the importance of not removing the possibility of redemption from a person convicted.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To quote Gandhi, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” This quote holds some key evidence for the death penalty. Taking one man’s life to justify the murder of another is preposterous! Executing someone does not restore balance. At the start of researching the death penalty, my view was initially in favor of the death penalty, but after all the research and facts, my conclusive view is against the death penalty. I found that my views changed and even though I might have been for the death penalty at the beginning, after my research I found that the death penalty is nothing more than the government reminding everyone that in the end, they have the final say.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As he states; “Some critics of capital punishment, such as columnist Jimmy Breslin, have suggested that a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death.’ This is sophistic nonsense” (Koch 486). Koch disagrees with Jimmy Breslin, because he is not convinced that a life sentence in prison is harsher than an execution. While Koch sees a person convicted for murder being executed, Bruck’s idea is to make sure that the convicted murderer has proof of either being guilty or innocent. Bruck believes that it is important to know because there have been cases where innocent people have been executed before. An example of an innocent person who was almost executed was Lenell Jeter.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some people may get closure from executions, others will move with their lives. Yet, some individuals never find peace. So, it would not be right to say that the death penalty gives closure to the victim 's family. In addition to this, the proponents of the death penalty argue that it is moral to kill the murderers. They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why is the death penalty still around? Capital punishment is the legal killing of an individual as a consequence of an unlawful act they commit. The death penalty has had an increased resentment but has not been abolished largely due to the belief that it is a deterrent to violent crime. There are a myriad of reasons why this punishment is looked down upon in society mainly structured on the argument that it is ineffective and paradoxical in the way it serves justice. The death penalty is ineffective in the process it takes to punish criminals and in the ways it makes society safer.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights. Burns thinks that by killing the person we have alleviate the anger, and have rid the world of that wicked person. We have somehow, gained retribution for the act they have committed, and shown others that we do not allow this act. But, I believe by allowing the courts to legally kill we are promoting the act of killing. We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society feels that a judgment set is ample for the victims’ trauma, that the victims will feel accomplished by inducing the capital punishment. In fact, is it not true that most of these cases are open and shut because the jury is already set with a one-track mind of convicting a criminal and sentencing them to death? Yet, if a juror were falsely accused would they not like a fair trial? Would they not expect to be heard out instead of already knowing their verdict? As such if found guilty for a very offensive crime, would they expect the death penalty or to be left to serve their time?…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics