Business Law Case Analysis Essay
SUMMARY: A new state law mandates that all employers must prohibit smoking on employer premises, and is responsible to enforce this law whether it be an employee, customer or client smoking the employer is always required to enforce the law that no one can smoke there.
ANALYSIS/ PERSONAL COMMENTARY: This is substantive law as it is defining the liability that the employer has to keep employees/clients/customers from smoking on the premises of their place of business. And I think the fact that the employer will get a court order requiring them to enforce the law is a smart step to ensure that the law will be followed more strictly.
Responded to: one, two, THREE WOOO
SUMMARY: After discovery in a court …show more content…
RESPOND TO 3 OTHER STUDENTS’ POSTS:
SUMMARY: John was driving recklessly, and Ramona was walking recklessly across a crosswalk and John hit Ramona with his car injuring her. In trial he was found 80% at fault and her 20% at fault with the injuries costing $100,000. How much, if any, recovery would Ramona receive in a state that applies the contributory negligence rule? And, how much, if any, would Ramona receive in recovery in a state that applies the comparative negligence law.
ANALYSIS: In a state that applies the contributory negligence rule, Ramona would receive nothing. This is because under