Brittney Cooper, Non-Disrespectability Towards A Ratchet Black Feminism

Improved Essays
No other event would be more uncomfortable, and that was why this one was perfect. A white, middle-class male attending a feminist African American event based around promoting the disrespectability of African American women towards white male figures in power. As the clock struck six, Dr. Brittney Cooper stepped onto the stage and opened her presentation, entitled Dis-Respectability: Towards A Ratchet Black Feminism. Nearly every other white male in the room seemed to visibly squirm in their seat. However, what followed was not a ninety-minute presentation on why white males need to be disrespected, but an enlightening dialogue about the failed efforts of African Americans to conform to white social constructs. This presentation, peppered …show more content…
Cooper proposes a “disrespectability complex” instead. In Cooper’s words, this would be a construct which “disses and dismisses respectability by acting as an act of defiance to social conformity.” This form of acting would be a more effective action for African Americans since it would not force people to assign value to people who are more or less respectable in the eyes of white people. The very act of saying that someone is or is not respectable binds them under the constructs that white society has invoked, thus ensuring that true equality and respect can never be reached since African Americans will always be compared to whites, especially as lesser counterparts. By proposing this mindset, Cooper proposes that African Americans go all out in their disrespectability, so much so that they would be considered ratchet. Ratchet, as Cooper defines it, is similar to being ghetto in that a negatively perceived social norm for African Americans is reached. However, it greatly differs in concern to how this perception is received by the person being judged. Ghetto has a type of self-consciousness to it, whereas ratchet-ness “just doesn’t give a fuck” about what other’s think. This action of being as “extra” as possible challenges the power structure of respectability, because it simply doesn’t care about where others place it on the respectability spectrum. This defiance would ultimately force those who judge to stop, since African Americans simply could not be …show more content…
Cooper that the system of respectability which African Americans have attempted to implement to gain social equality and respect has failed. To continue to pursue this mission with the same approach would be foolish. However, I believe more firmly that civil unrest and peaceful protest will be the driving force of change, as the history of change in the United States is built upon such activities like the March on Washington and the Montgomery Bus Boycott. To suggest that only the disrespect of white authoritarians by blacks as individuals would provide social equality is an ineffective strategy. What would be a more successful force would be to unify African Americans behind such unrest in order to inspire this change. My initial instinct, before viewing the entirety of the talk, was that such an attempt to change African American social norms would be entirely ineffective in the fight for social equality. However, after engaging in Cooper’s presentation, I understand the cultural and social significance behind inspiring such “ratchet” nature. I believe the point of promoting such behavior would allow African Americans to break out of the chains of respectable social conformity that has been thrust upon them, and allow them to be true to their cultural and social nature. Without breaking these proverbial chains and freeing African Americans from the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Whites do not receive the benefits of Affirmative Action. Whites are not granted “the equivalent of hundreds of SAT points” Martin Luther King Jr. stated that an “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” Those truly in favor of racial equality like Martin Luther King Jr. would not want this type of special treatment. A Black should have the same chances of success as a White, an Asian, or anyone of any ethnicity for that matter. Steele accounts for this desire for more than equality by blaming the self-victimizing nature of Blacks and White Guilt, but Steele fails to sufficiently show how equal the playing field is. Even though Steele does not sufficiently demonstrate this, he achieves his purpose with his timely and considerate argument of a complex relation between…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some felt strongly against these laws and spoke out against what they saw. Charles W. Chesnutt was a black man who could have easily passed as white. His essay entitled, “What is a White Man” criticized these discriminatory attitudes and ideals that supported them. He condemned the views of southern writers who tried to euphemize saying the white race must continue to “exercise exclusive control and direction of the government” and that blacks should have no voice in directing the government. Chesnutt highlights different state laws that constitute what it means to be black, and which privileges black people are restricted from.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    African-Americans are divided over the word usage. Everybody recognizes the negative history of oppression that’s tied with the “N” word. Those opposed to using it claim that African-American usage of the word won’t clear the word, allowing it to be used more widely, resulting the more harshness of the word and the with mentioning it more will become more controversial. Also popular usage of the word will create an endorsement of negative stereotypes and racial abuse. Those in approval of using the “N” word see it as a form of getting better, turning the meaning of the word on its head and reducing its harms.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    White people constantly say that everyone is equal, but in reality, they are not. The Black Lives Matter movement wants to tell the world that black people are getting treated indifferently. My own view, however, is that social inequality is getting out of hand and needs to be resolved quickly. People have blinders on and people want to pretend they do not see what is currently happening; therefore, the problem will not be solved. Prince Jones, for example, was shot by a police officer who thought he was another criminal.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethically, white people have been known to deny white privilege. But by being a black person that people constitute with being violent, black people fear being seen as violent so they have to adapt non stereotypical behavior which inherently enhances the theme of white privilege. Crosley-Corcoran supportively is reaccentuating the reasoning of how we don’t entirely choose our own identity, but sometimes white people unethically take advantage of the opportunities they are…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King once said, “The aftermath of nonviolence is reconciliation and the creation of a beloved community.” King believed that whites and blacks could get along, unlike Malcom X who commonly referred to whites as “the devils.” Malcom X believed, “The only possible way out for the white man is to give us some land of our own; let us get out, get away from his wicked reign and go for ourselves.” Relying on violence was not the best idea for African Americans in the 1960s who already endured several difficulties. Instilling and enforcing a savage mentality did not resolve anything and did not give a chance for an integrated society as King…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Washington believed that if they were equal they should be treated as such. DuBois stated about Washington, “He insists on thrift and self-respect, but at the same time counsels a silent submission to civic inferiority such as is bound to sap the manhood of any race in the long run.” DuBois was on the right track, if African Americans wanted to be heard they needed to make their voices heard. Asking for equality was not far-fetched considering that African Americans were as much humans as White Americans were. Although we live in a different era, DuBois was saying radical things back then and could get you killed back in his…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only effective way to enforce reparations, however, would be to raise awareness that African Americans are still at a disadvantage because of the circumstances they are born into that came from their treatment in the past, even if no one is consciously discriminating against them nowadays. No one wants to think that they are a racist. In addition, whites realizing that they are at a better position just for the circumstances they happen to be born into because “white poverty is not negro poverty” as President Johnson said (Coates, The Case for Reparations.) Reparations will only be possible when Americans realize that race and class should not be…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Washington believed that if they were equal they should be treated as such. DuBois stated about Washington, “He insists on thrift and self-respect, but at the same time counsels a silent submission to civic inferiority such as is bound to sap the manhood of any race in the long run.” DuBois was on the right track, if African Americans wanted to be heard they needed to make some noise. Asking for equality was not far-fetched considering that African Americans were as much humans as White Americans were. Because we live in a different era, it is hard to believe some thought of DuBois a radical back then and his actions were life…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The radical critique illustrates that the law is racist because it is made by white people to protect their interests, with no regard to the effects it will have on the black community (1). This argument means that when black criminals are locked up, it is because white people created the situation that brought him to that point. Butler believes that the rule of law is a myth. The rule of law is that “any result can be derived from the pre-existing legal doctrine” (1), which basically means that law has the inability to be neutral. This is in relation to jury nullification, which means jurors acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics