Brad Bushman The Death Penalty Analysis

Improved Essays
This Article is Brad J. Bushman’s opinion on why the Death Penalty should be “killed” off. Bushman believes the Death Penalty is “ deeply flawed” because of the process people go through for the Death Penalty. He states that the system is flawed mostly because it “models the behavior it seeks to prevent.” He disagrees with the fact that the government can kill people without punishment but people can not kill people without the same rights. He also states that it discriminates against poor people. If you are rich you can easily escape from the Death Penalty by hiring a “big-wig” lawyer but if you are poor and can not afford a lawyer then you get a state appointed one that does not fight as hard as the one making the big bucks. It also discriminates against African Americans. There are about 3,000 people on death row and 48% of them are African American. The odds of getting put on death row increase by 38% when you are African American. The death penalty does not help fight crime but causes more. The article states that states with the death penalty have “homicide rates 48%- 101% higher than the states that don’t.” He states that most people commit murder in an uncontrollable anger and that they do not think about the consequences, therefore it is not fair to …show more content…
When she went to trial all she wanted was the bomber to get the Death Penalty. She said, “And I also decided early on that the death penalty was the verdict that I wanted for him. I believe in my heart of hearts that he knew exactly what he was doing the moment before he did it, and possibly months before that. Among other horrific charges, he used a weapon of mass destruction to intentionally harm and kill people.” It would not be equitable to those 260 other people along with Adrienne to just get to see their murder/abuser walk away and happily be put in jail and taken care of for the rest of his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the book Capital Punishment by Michael Kronenwetter . He talks about how capital punishment was favorable for our country. He explained the power of the death sentence and how it helped the government and the people of the United States. He explained how the capital punishment was a deterrent for people. That anyone who would think about committing a murder would think before because they would be afraid of the consequence.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Professor of law David Bruck countered this idea in his response essay, “The Death Penalty.” Bruck expressed his opinion that the death penalty creates “an attitude towards human life that is not reverent, but reckless”…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment is seen by not only many people but also states immorally just and a waste. The death penalty is way to punish the ones who have unfairly punished others. It is a good thing because life sentences given to criminals who should receive the death penalty is an unfair financial burden on the state. The prison system in America is the largest…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “The Death Penalty: Is it Ever Justified”, the longtime democratic and former mayor of New York Edward Koch refutes the idea that death penalty should be removed due to the possibility of an innocent suspect. To counter, Koch explains that states, “Human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to guarantee protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again”. He goes on by adding that administering the death penalty is the only guaranteed solution. While killing these people does assure they will not commit murder again, the idea that an innocent citizen could be wrongly accused and receive the death penalty is an abhorrent thought. Once a citizen is executed, if more information is discovered…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hypocritical Taking of Lives It seemed like a normal February night for Wanda Lopez, a single mother, working behind the register of the Shamrock gas station convenience store. That is, until she noticed a man loitering outside the door in the parking lot of where she worked. She called the police to report the drunk who had just come from the bar next door and was told to call back if he came inside. A few minutes later, the man walked into the store holding a knife.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been a topic of contention since it was introduced among humankind. The two sides of this issue are either for or against it. There are many solid points between the two disagreeing parties that need to be explored to make an informed decision on which side you would choose to support. Two essays I will draw from in this writing are written by Edward Koch, who is for, and David Bruck, who is against it. Both parties have made excellent points in their writings and will be great avenues to explore while making your decision.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should the U.S have the Death Penalty? Do you believe in the Death Penalty? In this essay you might be persuaded to the opposite side of your belief or stuck in the middle. I got my facts and details from Death penalty in the United States: why we still have it by Kevin Rizzo, December 20, 2014.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Detrimental Effects of the Death Penalty in America After several decades of debate, the death penalty continues to rise as a contentious issue in the United States of America. The morality and inefficient process of execution has come into question, with many opposing a punishment that half the world no longer uses. A slow and tedious process that welcomes botched executions, the legality of the death penalty has raised reasonable concern. Although the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty as constitutional, capital punishment still has various disadvantages that many Americans are unaware of.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upon celebrating the 20 anniversary of being released, today, Sabrina Butler works as the assistant director of membership and training at the Witness to Innocence program. Together with her husband and three children, Sabrina now lives a normal life back in Columbus, Mississippi. When she reflects on the hardship that she has experienced, Sabrina stands firmly behind the idea that death penalty should be abolished entirely: “even if every reform was adopted, innocent people would still get convicted and sent to death row,” she said. She believes that “as long as human beings are in charge, they will make mistakes.” Butler contends that if death penalty cannot assure that all inmates on death row are utterly guilty, the criminal justice system should not risk the chance to execute innocent people.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays