Brad Bushman The Death Penalty Analysis

Good Essays
This Article is Brad J. Bushman’s opinion on why the Death Penalty should be “killed” off. Bushman believes the Death Penalty is “ deeply flawed” because of the process people go through for the Death Penalty. He states that the system is flawed mostly because it “models the behavior it seeks to prevent.” He disagrees with the fact that the government can kill people without punishment but people can not kill people without the same rights. He also states that it discriminates against poor people. If you are rich you can easily escape from the Death Penalty by hiring a “big-wig” lawyer but if you are poor and can not afford a lawyer then you get a state appointed one that does not fight as hard as the one making the big bucks. It also discriminates against African Americans. There are about 3,000 people on death row and 48% of them are African American. The odds of getting put on death row increase by 38% when you are African American. The death penalty does not help fight crime but causes more. The article states that states with the death penalty have “homicide rates 48%- 101% higher than the states that don’t.” He states that most people commit murder in an uncontrollable anger and that they do not think about the consequences, therefore it is not fair to …show more content…
When she went to trial all she wanted was the bomber to get the Death Penalty. She said, “And I also decided early on that the death penalty was the verdict that I wanted for him. I believe in my heart of hearts that he knew exactly what he was doing the moment before he did it, and possibly months before that. Among other horrific charges, he used a weapon of mass destruction to intentionally harm and kill people.” It would not be equitable to those 260 other people along with Adrienne to just get to see their murder/abuser walk away and happily be put in jail and taken care of for the rest of his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment is a very controversial topic in america right now because of moral reasons such as if they killed why should we kill them. Also why should we have a the right to take a life if the reason why we are killing is because the man took a life. The cost is another part of the controversy, because it costs more to kill the prisoner than it does to keep them in prison for life without parole. Prison is supposed to be punishment for the bad things people do so if prison is worse than outside life why do we have it. Finally people always wonder if capital punishment has something to do with racism because if it does than people want to get rid of it completely.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We are taught from an early age that two wrongs do not make a right. In that sense, when one condones capital punishment, which is murdering a being under lawful ruling for a heinous crime done, we are saying we have the right to take someone’s life. The question is, by achieving this, are we less guilty? Capital punishment has more flaws than the justice it has to offer; it should be abolished. Capital punishment should be abolished because there are too many innocent people sentenced to death, death penalty trials are much more expensive than life imprisonment, there are botched executions, unfairness against the economically disadvantaged, and racism is present in the trials.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty has been given to criminals who have done the most horrendous crimes in order to show a message that murderers will be punished to the full extent. However, this thinking is flawed and murder cannot be discouraged with more murder. Although the death penalty is supposed to deter crime, studies have revealed its opposite and unexpected effect. Several factors skew the justice system, in which minorities have a higher chance of receiving the death penalty. The death penalty is largely ineffective because it puts minorities at a disadvantage, fails to deter crime, and is expensive.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Opponents also say that the death penalty is used unfairly. That poor people are more likely to be put to death because they cannot afford the high-powered defense that a wealthy person can buy. O. J. Simpson for example, many believe that he did kill his ex-wife, but since he had so much money he easily was able to pay for a good lawyer to get him out of his crime. Another issue that those against the Death Penalty have to say is that, “juveniles ' brains are not yet fully developed and juveniles are less mature than adults, [and that] they should not be punished as adults.” (Juvenile Death Penalty). Age should not be a factor…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People fail to realize that they have become desensitized by the corruption of common day movies, games, and news. All of the corruption that we have seen plays a role on what we believe in today’s society, but it takes a courageous and faithful person to know that the death penalty is not correct and should be abolished. Agreeing with the death penalty puts civilians at the same mental level of those who commit murder, because they yearn for the unjust punishment to end someone’s life. After gathering research, roughly 120 out of 3,000 inmates that are currently facing death row might be innocent (Drehle). Many death row cases are based on eyewitness information, because the case lacks leads from other sources, which leaves the prosecutors to relay on the eyewitness, as described in the innocent execution of Carlos Luna (10 Convicts Presumed Innocent After Execution, 2010).…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, people who are up on the death penalty could be innocents that were falsely accused. Also, the death penalty cost the government a lot of money and is usually racially biased. The death penalty should be abolished because the government contributing unnecessary large amount of funding, it’s racially biased, and could be killing innocent and violates our rights. The government funds vast amount of money just to kill someone on death penalty. The amount of money required for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    No doubt that living is better than death; however living in a confinement for an extended period of time (several decades) is tiring and a punishment in itself. The death sentence does not make the criminal any better or make the criminal feel guilty about his/her wrong-doings. The criminal gets put to sleep and no type of punishment is served; the victim does not get the genuine justice. Why should the government kill people who themselves kill other people to show that killing is wrong. Death Penalty is unethical and it should be condemned, most religions, if not all, have some relationship to why a killing is wrong.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents. The death penalty is a bad thing for inmates family because it's a reminder of what the government did to their loved one. When put on death row there is a risk of executing an innocent person.When DNA exonerations several that murder case are often riddled with problems. The problems are mistaken eyewitnesses, bad lawyers, shoddy forensics, unbridledly, jailhouse snitches etc. Ray…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    N.p., 11 Nov. 2013.) This is saying it 's okay to do the same thing a murder did if I interpreted it right. This should mean that the person following up with the execution put on the Death Row but they can’t because he’s legally taking someone 's life. This plays a huge role because it just shows how bad the United States is with dealing with all of their problems.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The worse crime should get the highest punishment because if he killer didn’t get punished then our gov’t wouldn’t be serving its country of protecting its people. The worse the crime then no question about it that the assailant should get the worst possible consequence (Gold 2012). Capital punishment is the result for a human life being sacrificed. If a murderer didn’t receive the death penalty then it would fail the importance of our laws and social morality (Gold 2012). In our society today, citizens see murder as something disgusting and as an act that goes against everyone’s morality.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays