Blaise Pascal's Wager Research Paper

Decent Essays
Blaise Pascal’s wager about is an interest thought experiment because it essentially puts science and faith at two distinct entities that have defining roles. The whole notion of the wager is to prove the supremacy of God and that life is being played at his discretion with the notion that someday we may or may not meet him. When the existence of God is questioned, individuals try to use science and scientific reasoning to prove that belief. The nature of God is to be above the notion of scientific proof and thus cannot be proven by which has been created by man. You cannot prove God by using science and thus science can only explain the physical world, while faith is what explains God by connecting with him in our daily lives. Secondly, life

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Pascal’s Wager, he believes that we should live our lives like God exists because we have nothing to lose from it. If we believe in him and he does exist, we get to go to heaven, and if he does exist and we lived our lives like he doesn’t exist, we go to hell. Pascal thinks we have nothing to lose from believing in God but I think that is one of the things that he is wrong about. If we pretend to believe in God just in case he is real so we can go to heaven, wouldn’t God be able to tell if we were lying about it our whole lives?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author contradicts himself. At the same time he argues that the strength of religion was from observed phenomena and when scientific discoveries uncover the mystery, the faith in religion has declined. As a physicist, he has put forward his opinion but the strength of science is only to that physical explanation and human with limited knowledge are trying to make people believe on it. The author completely forgets that Newton’s belief on religion has made it possible to postulate the laws of motion. Why does the author talk about the philosophical things when he is a physicist who has other mysteries to unveil to support science rather than reject religion?…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did this post make you feel? I feel genuinely apologetic for the author because the way she wrote the article makes it seem as though she lives her life in constant fear of a possibility that she may be raped. Did this post resonate with you for any reason? Why?…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I first outline Pascal’s wager to the existence of God and then evaluate his argument. Pascal argues that one ought to wager “that God is” because “[i]f you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing,” and that given this, one can bring oneself to believe in God. I argue that one cannot truly bring themselves to believe in God. Pascal’s argument is set up in three parts. The first part accepts that God is infinitely incomprehensible.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, is you believe in god and god does not exist, the time spent on believing is wasted but the result isn't terrible. Third, says that you don't believe in god but god actually does exist, Pascal says then you would suffer from an eternal punishment. Last, proposes that you don't believe in god and god does not exist, then you would not gain or lose any benefits from this outcome. Pascal's assumptions to his argument may seem extreme since there are only four outcomes, but I find them somewhat fair. The equation of his argument can be taken and applied to almost anything and still cover the four basic outcomes.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sometimes, belief is considered beneficial regardless of whether it holds truth or not. For example, if one enters a sports competition as a low underdog, a strong belief in team unity and ability can propel the potentially losing team to victory. This idea that meaningful beliefs overshadow those that are true is called pragmatism. Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician, physician, and religious philosopher (Biography.com Editors), took a pragmatic approach to the widely discussed topic of God’s existence. In his piece Faith Without Reasoning, Pascal gives us a scenario penned “Pascal’s Wager,” which insists that from a gambler’s standpoint, we should always side with accepting God’s existence.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the philosophical short story, “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson, she examines the immorality of the human kind. Analogous to “The Lottery,” “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” by Ursula Le Guin demonstrates the perversion of innocence in both stories. Jackson and Le Guin both craft a society of conformity, scapegoatism, and controversy. The ideals in both short stories conflict with societal norms.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Introduction Over the last few thousand years or so, the question of whether God exists or not has been under serious examination. There are only two answers to this question: either you do believe in God’s existence or you don’t. Even if all the evidence in the entire universe leans towards the latter, some people still assume that a supernatural being exists. Blaise Pascal was one of these individuals, and he also believes that regardless of whether it’s probable or not, it’s in your best interest to believe in the existence of God. This idea is called Pascal’s Wager, and it states that although the odds may be against it, the payoff for believing in God is much more fulfilling than not believing.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathaniel Richardson PHIL 3121 Pascal Essay Pascal argues that you should believe in God because if you live a virtuous life and God is real you will have an infinite life in heaven. But if you believe in God and he is not real the only thing you will lose is the pleasures of sin. He believes sin is innate in us as we are born into sin and that is what we ultimately would rather do than live virtuously. On the other if you don’t believe and he is real you will have an infinite life but just in hell.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal's Wager

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pascal argues that we cannot use reason to establish God's existence; he either exists, or he does not, but it is prudent to believe in his existence than to not believe. More specifically, Pascal's wager suggests, if God does not exist, there is nothing to lose by belief, and nothing to gain by disbelief. On the contrary, if God does exist, belief offers infinite reward to heaven, whereas disbelief leads to infinite punishment in hell. Therefore, believing in God is the only rational choice. I disagree with Pascal's theory.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We live in a society that follows the traits that are often old enough for the current situation and we have the kind of nature by which we try to follow what the majority of the population does. Sometime it is the pressure from the mass which lets us to oppose our own judgement of a certain case that we have different perception about. It may not matter what society we live in, as we humans always tend to have similar way of thinking in all aspects of life. In “The Lottery” by Chris Abani, he describes his incapability to refrain from the decision made by the crowd and not by the way he judged the situation.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Boyle was a very well known philosopher of the seventeenth century. Coming from a wealthy background, Boyle was able to travel to many countries and gain knowledge about how the world works. He was curious and liked to perform experiments that would lead to discoveries about how God was present in nature. Being a devoted follower of Christ and active in his faith, he was very insistent that God was present in every situation and that the credit should always be given to Him. One of Boyle's most persuasive arguments was related to how he viewed the relationship between God and nature.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    231 If Darwin thinks that species are weeded out through the process of natural selection, this would appear to negate what Paley believes, which is an intelligent Creator. Darwin preserves the ideologies put forth by Paley, in which a successor will not possess qualities, which are harmful to its creator or “possessor” as Darwin calls it. The possibility for Darwin’s theory to preserve any of Paley’s argument, involves seeing natural selection as part of a perfect design, with a creator who understands the designs, wherein some species are weaker than others, but not with the intention to do harm to other species.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will analyze John Harris’ argument structure in his 1975 article “The Survival Lottery,” then raise an objection to one of his arguments, then I will state what I believe Harris’ response to my arguments would be. After an analysis of Harris’ arguments, I disagree with Harris’ assertion that all lives are equal based on arguments involving society, virtue, and social effect. I believe that Harris would counter with arguments of utilitarianism, legality, and application of the veil of ignorance. Harris concludes through his arguments, a lottery to select those that would be killed for the purpose of organ harvest is not just morally permissible, it is a moral obligation.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays