Belenky propose that women have different ways of growing and knowing, generally characterized in different content then men. For women, their identity is linked to romantic relationships, connection with others that could develop their personality traits and intimacy, rather than not being a separate self-defined individual. They prefer cooperation by forming open communication, instead of competition. Women view moral decisions as being based on an ethic of caring. They do not view ethic of justice in the same manner or tradition. Additionally, two important factors for women is that their relationships are the core of their human being, identity along with intimacy are issues of great importance. Women 's development usually does not follow
…show more content…
They are both different genders that have different mindsets and even in their biology of structure. Each gender has unique values that are their foundations. Both have different expectations in society, thus making them having different personalities traits that are the key factors to their genders. Moreover, I strongly believe argument between men and women are based on empiricism along with observation. Empiricism identifies ways in which dominant concepts and practices of knowledge attribution, acquisition, and justification systematically are developed. While observation stems from sociology on how both men and female interact with each other. Additionally, how they interact with their own gender and how society shapes their behaviors or …show more content…
Belenky describe how both male and females have different roles in society. They have different expectations in life when it comes to their attitudes, how they express their emotions, body language, and different career goals or their own versions of success. Their overall environments affect them different ways in sociocultural “atmosphere”. Moreover, when it comes to sociological differences men and females act according to their genders behaviors, because it’s how society has shape them. This is far different from biological differences, because in the nature vs nurture argument, I believe nurture shapes human environments far more than sciences. Furthermore, one own experience can make males or females reinforce the environment they experience, when it comes to nurture vs nature
They are both different genders that have different mindsets and even in their biology of structure. Each gender has unique values that are their foundations. Both have different expectations in society, thus making them having different personalities traits that are the key factors to their genders. Moreover, I strongly believe argument between men and women are based on empiricism along with observation. Empiricism identifies ways in which dominant concepts and practices of knowledge attribution, acquisition, and justification systematically are developed. While observation stems from sociology on how both men and female interact with each other. Additionally, how they interact with their own gender and how society shapes their behaviors or …show more content…
Belenky describe how both male and females have different roles in society. They have different expectations in life when it comes to their attitudes, how they express their emotions, body language, and different career goals or their own versions of success. Their overall environments affect them different ways in sociocultural “atmosphere”. Moreover, when it comes to sociological differences men and females act according to their genders behaviors, because it’s how society has shape them. This is far different from biological differences, because in the nature vs nurture argument, I believe nurture shapes human environments far more than sciences. Furthermore, one own experience can make males or females reinforce the environment they experience, when it comes to nurture vs nature