Avery And Dassey's Trial

Better Essays
and he was seething with anger having to even provide this vindication to essentially clear two officer’s names.
The eighth principle is the right of the defendant to be brought before a court. This was proven throughout the documentary; Avery and Dassey’s rights to a public trial by jury were upheld. This is corresponded with our seventh amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is the right of the accused to a trial by jury, these are due process rights. Avery’s trial was very lengthy and both he and Dassey were present during their trials. There were not any unusual reactions to this aside from Avery and Dassey’s confusion to being arrested and tried in court. Avery’s family members such as his parents, acted with misperception in every
…show more content…
The prosecutors and law enforcement officials want to see a conviction, the defense attorneys and the defendant’s family want to see a not guilty verdict. The judge and the jury are supposed to be neutral figures that listen to the allegations and resistance to them, and then make a decision based on their own opinion of what they saw and heard. According to the Law Library - American Law and Legal Information, in an article titled “Criminal Trial - The Atmosphere Surrounding The Trial” it is stated that “It is obvious that even if a trial is technically correct in terms of evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, and other rulings during the trial itself, a trial can still be unfair because it takes place in an atmosphere that is prejudicial to the defendant.” This means we can have trials that are precise within the rules of our legal system, and yet they still can be prejudicial to the defendant which is a fundamental flaw in our …show more content…
I believe this can be argued both ways in terms of whether it was ignored or proven in the documentary, with the keyword being “proper” in Ashworth’s principle. Avery was able to use his settlement from his lawsuit against Manitowoc County for wrongful conviction to hire his attorneys, Strang and Buting. He was represented in court by two highly experienced lawyers that believed he was innocent, so in this case there was no error in justice because he had money for his own attorneys. Regarding Dassey, it is a little more difficult because there is conflicting information throughout the documentary. Dassey was questioned numerous times by the police without counsel present, and this led to him incriminating himself. It was even said that Dassey’s appointed counsel knew he was being questioned and chose not to be present. Dassey filed a motion for a new attorney but it was denied because the only reason provided was that Dassey felt his lawyer believed he was guilty. This was an injustice to Dassey, defendants should be able to be represented by an attorney they trust and are confident in. Often times, court appointed attorneys have an overwhelming caseload, making it difficult to have time to spend on each case. This really shows that money can sometimes be the key in an innocent verdict, obviously not with Avery’s case but if Dassey was able to receive counsel he trusted, he may have been able to receive a lesser

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Through this video it is apparent that the plea bargaining process is not being properly used in many cases. In one instance, the lawyer of one individual being charged was unprepared and offered little to no counsel for his client facing conviction. Plea bargaining is widely abused in the court systems. The cases outlined in the Frontline video were not positive representations of justice being served. It is important for cases to be resolved quickly as the court systems are overloaded with cases.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfortunately, all too often prosecutors fall under the spell of conviction-seeking no matter what. They become focused on conviction rates. They forgot that their judicial duties are to guard the rights of the accused and protect the…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A juror, in this day and age, is needed in order for defendants to receive a fair and competent trial. Not every Juror, however, qualifies to attend a trial and determine the faith of the defendant. In order for a person to qualify as a juror, they are required to sustain certain functions in the court of law. That being said, the main function that a Juror must follow is the idea of determining who is a reliable witness and which statement is the most credible (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). Once the testimony has been evaluated…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His speech at a criminal justice convention targeted high-profile politicians, judges, ranking military officials, and legislative members to raise awareness about capital punishment. ______________________________________________________________________________ Good afternoon respected guests, When I first became a lawyer, my first case was to defend an innocent man from conviction. After getting to know him a bit better, I felt that it was my obligation to prove his innocence because he deserved his freedom. Having spent a majority of my life trying to protect criminals from unfair justice, I’ve gained a place at one of the most prestigious law firms in the country. I’ve spent countless hours with criminals, understanding that each criminal is unique in his or her own way.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brenton Butler Case Study

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The setting he was presented in, the time he was allowed to view Mr. Butler, the distance he viewed him and the traumatic state he was in, all led to his wrongful identification of Brenton Butler. The prosecution had no case really and the majority of the case was spent defending Brenton Butler. The only thing they had was a faulty eyewitness identification because the victim claimed he did not see a logo and Brenton Butler had a big Nautica logo on his shirt that could hardly be missed. The victim was clearly in distress. When the identity of the real murderer was revealed, the obvious differences between the Brenton and Curtis were unimaginable.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another common stereotype my profession receives is that we "have licenses to steal from people" which is not true. These perceptions of lawyers and attorneys probably arose from the scams people encountered and the fees it takes to hire an attorney. Mrs. Ceccon also said, “that being told you are boring before a person gets to know you is the most frustrating". Yes, attorney 's read a lot of texts and much is not for leisure but to automatically mark them as boring because of their profession is not fair, in fact, many of them take up hobbies. Though these negative views played a small role in her transfer of careers it did not stop her from helping other achieve their desire to go into the law field.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The system does not do enough to help defense attorneys bring to light, in an organized fashion, favorable facts to their clients during the plea bargaining stage” (McConkie, 2015). Most plea bargaining’s are held off the court record and without the judges or defendants being present. Once the attorney and prosecutor come to an agreement the attorney will take the offer to their client for approval. If the client approves it goes before the judge to settle and finish the case at which time the defendant would be sentenced by the recommendations of the plea bargaining. The judges do not tend to go against these pleas because the judge does not have enough facts of the case before him to overrule on what sentencing should be.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The purpose of the trial is to request the judge or jury to decide the outcome of a legal matter. There are two major differences between civil and criminal trials. The first, a civil trials outcome can be handed down from a judge unilaterally, without the need for a jury. But in criminal trials, the judge cannot unilaterally enter judgment, entering judgment is exclusively given to the jury. The second, is the burden of proof required to assign guilt.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Typically jurors enter a trial setting believing that the defendant is guilty. It is the opposing legal counsel’s argument that sways their opinions. Overall, the prosecutor’s opening arguments; the jurors’ initial impression of the defendant(s) and the jurors’ personal values from an initial influence. The jurors use these stimuli to evaluate the case as the counselors present new statement and evidence, continually renewing this process through the trial. Once the juror had formed an opinion it is unlikely that they will change the verdict they…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics