Purpose Of Egypt To Attack Israel By Anwar Sadat

Improved Essays
Analysis
In writer analysis The first actor behind this war is Egypt president Anwar Sadat. To anwering Essay Question of what is the purpose of Egypt to attacking Israel is because Anwar Saddat want to taking back their National Pride and Sinai Territory after defeated by Israel in Six Days War 1967. Egypt economic was not stable after Six Days War 1967 also Egypt lost almost half their military power and Anwar Saddat Wants to taking back Sinai region because is very important for Egypt. During the period there is a small conflict with Egypt and Israel on Sinai territory after Israel controling Sinai and they call “Atrisi War”. In Atrisi war Egypt was attacked by Israel from Sinai region but Egypt attacking them too. This is very dangerous
…show more content…
So Egypt leader wants to taking back their national pride. This is one of the purpose why Anwar Sadat wants to revenge to Israel under his leadership. To attack Israel once again Anwar Saddat create their grand strategy. Saddat wants to gather power from Arab Nation like Syria also Saudi Arabia to support him on the battle with Israel. Syria is one of Egypt allies under the leadership of Al-Assad they are becoming a serious threat for Israel also with Yordania. But after Six Days War there is a difference understanding about military force towards Arab Countries also Egypt and Syria. Because USA and Israel didn't think about their military capability to create a modern warfare against Israel. But after Six Days War Egypt also Syiria had a military cooperation with Soviet Union. Soviet Union send their weapon also military equipment for their allies and support them for this war. Because they want to protect their allies from USA and suppot Anwar Saddat grand strategy. (Oktorino, …show more content…
Anwar Saddat was the main actor of this war because some economic problem and national prides in his country he think that it will be a good strategy if they attacking Israel. This war is about reclaiming Sinai territory and inviting Syrian to taking back Golan Mountain from Israel. After this war Israel and Egypt negotiated and recover their diplomacy relations And their made Camp David agreement. So many Arab Country didn't like Egypt because they call Egypt a traitor under Anwar Saddat regime (Staff H. , 2009). But we can see there is no big war between Arab Nation and Israel in the future. This war is a historical for the both side because they can almost defeat Israel for the first time. But there is no winner in this War, the both sides has a big loss and also Egypt can reach their interest to taking back Sinai

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Eisenhower insists in his letter, “The use of military force against Egypt under present circumstances might have consequences even more serious than causing the Arabs to support Nasser”, implying the fear of the possibility of the Egyptian alliance with the Soviet Union.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Israel Dbq

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With outbreak of war occuring left and right between the Americas and Europe, including WWI, WWII, and the Cold War, violence is spreading throughout the world. With WWI, there was the formation of new alliances and new style of military. With WWII, there were horrendous genocides and a growth in foreign aid. With the Cold War, there was new technological advancements such as the use of nuclear warfare and atomic bombs. However, after WWII, there was the separation in the Muslim world. Israelis and Palestinians decided to end this ongoing struggle with the Arab-Israeli War, which promoted more and more conflict in Israel. This outbreak of violence swept through Israeli and threatened other countries as the US, Great Britain, and Egypt. The reactions these countries varied from…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On November 20th 1977 with Anwar presented his compelling and inspiring speech which perfectly represented his diplomatic coup de theatre. Through the acknowledgement of past wrongdoings, Sadat challenged his hesitant and reluctant audience devices to envision a permanent peace throughout Arab and Jewish states through identifying the nations’ shared experience of conflict, pain and suffering brought upon by war. Additionally, his speech gave him universal recognition for bravery and sacrifice. Due to the estranged relationship between Egypt and Israel it was imperative for Sadat to establish his objective of peace between the nations immediately. Sadat appeals to a higher being within the first sentence of his speech to establish a common ground as religion is of upmost importance for both Arab and Israeli states. Although one of the key causes for the estranged relationship in the Middle East was religion, Sadat aimed to use religious belief to overcome those differences. It allowed him to emphasise the minimal margin of separation between Egypt and Israel which gained him credibility or ‘ethos’. Similar to Atwood, Sadat’s tone was demanding and urgent to reflect the context and purpose of his speech. “We must rise against forms of fanaticism, self-deception and obsolete theories of superiority”. Sadat’s evident employment of emotive language highlights his deep desire to achieve his vision of peace throughout the land as well as allowing him to address and acknowledge the shared experiences of “feud, spite and hatred”. Alas, this enables him to establish a stronger connection with his audience through pathos. Furthermore, his concise speech structure enables the audience to remain focused and fixated with Sadat’s’ message,…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Israel’s air superiority can be seen as the most important factor in terms of their own actions; however, the lack of Arab coordination follows close as without Arab disunity, it is arguable that the outcome of the war would have taken a different path. Lack of Arab coordination enabled Israel to deal separately with Egypt, Jordan and Syria, rather than having to fight a genuine three-frontal…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So Sadat conceived of a daring plan to attack Israel again, which, even if unsuccessful, might convince the Israelis that peace with Egypt was necessary.”(History.com 2010)…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genocide In Yemen Essay

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin, a rebellious group known as the Houthis have overthrown the Yemeni president, and are now taking territory As a result, the Saudi-led Arab states attempt to regain the territory by launching airstrikes. However,…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    resolution brokered by the U.S. and the Soviet Union called for an end to hostilities. As a result of United Nations Security Council “Resolution 340” most of the heavy fighting on the Egyptian front ended on October 26. Although the military campaign was successful, the outcome of the crisis created negative impact on Israel status in both its stand of economics and military powers. The international communities condemned the coalition military actions. The outcome of the crisis clearly demonstrated the limited ability of the combined military powers, which deemed incomparable to the then two super powers of United States and the Soviet Union. Most crucially, Israel military campaign in the Suez Crisis was a failed strategy by help of their ally forces. Clearly, Israel military campaign in the Suez Canal crisis did not achieved a strong political case in winning the battles at the Suez…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ancient Egyptian Warfare

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Ancient Egyptian times, the Egyptians fought between one another over who was in charge and whether the kingdoms would be united. Most of the time, kingdoms were at peace, but there were some times when the Ancient Egyptians would go to war. The areas were covered with dry deserts and sand so if someone tried to invade, it would be difficult. They were, however, invaded by the Nubians from the south, the Hyksos from the north, and later on, the Libyans from the west. The Egyptians had three different time periods where they fought in wars and later advanced their weapons and military strategies. Weapons were important to be able to fight during war.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egypt has an expansive, colorful, and intriguing history by any metric but this is especially true of its history of collective violence. Egypt has played an important role in history starting back in ancient times with a mighty empire and lasting all the way to the present day with a current propensity towards military authoritarian rule. As with any country, especially one that’s been around in one form or another for so long, there have been many periods of turmoil and violence along the way that make Egypt an unfortunately excellent case study of the phenomenon of collective violence. To keep a modern focus on Egypt’s run ins with collective violence it makes the most sense to start with Egypt’s unique experience under the Ottoman Empire and move forward from there. Looking at the significant events within this period, from assimilation into the Ottoman Empire, to British occupation, to military coups, and its experience of the Arab Spring, it is clear to see many of the…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Modern Day Egypt

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When we think of Egypt we think of the Great Pyramids . We think of the Sphinx, the Temple of Isis and Ramses II, hieroglyphics and mummies, but what we do not think of, is the modern day problems occurring in Egypt. Egypt’s past is rich with history and people dedicate their lifetimes to discovering the hidden secrets of this ancient civilization. Though knowing the past is very important, we need to look forward and try to prevent more problems from occurring in the future. Modern day Egypt is much different than it was a century ago. Today Egypt is dangerous with high risk of terrorist attacks and riots on the streets. The hardships and danger in Egypt is caused by several factors such as government instability, increase in terrorism and…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assad hiccups started to occur later in 1970’s, when he decided to interfere with the civil war in Lebanon. Israel worried about…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carter knew the severity to resolve the issue at any cost. This is significant because if the issue was not resolved United States would lose its closest ally in the Middle East and major trading partners. Carter was aware of the response of the OPEC countries ( consisting mostly of Arab nations), which announced an oil embargo that led to drastic upheaval in the economy, due to the American involvement in the 1973 Yom Kippur War (Stein 2). Such involvement almost led to a direct confrontation between two of the nuclear superpowers; the United States support for Israel and Soviet Union support for Arab coalition. In the winter of 1977, the then President of Egypt, Anwar al- Sadat, made a dramatic move by publicly considering a visit to Jerusalem to hopefully resolve the longing problem between the Arab world and the Israeli. Sadat would try to overcome the stalemate by engaging with the Israeli openly for a foreseeable Middle East solution. Sadat’s visit to Jerusalem steered immediate talks between Egypt and Israel, however, it failed to finalize a concrete solution. Following the events Carter and his administration reappeared on the forefront of the…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, in one of his speeches, Nasser stated that “The call for Arab Nationalism is not a new call....The call of Arab nationalism rang throughout the centuries and showed its strength whenever the Arab countries were independent or whenever they felt the threat of danger.” Nasser uses nostalgia of the past victories of the Arab world to rally Egyptian citizens around him. He says that the Arab world, under threat of danger from a foreign nation, looked to Pan-Arabism and formed a strong, united army. He describes how “Arab Nationalism is the Arab’s path to sovereignty and freedom.” Therefore, serving as a united front would strengthen the national and truly show Egypt’s independence. In addition, Pan-Arab ideology suggested that all of the Arab world’s problems were due to colonialism. Pan-Arabism also stated that Israel (“Zionist Entity”) was the spearhead of this Western colonialism (Isseroff). Furthermore, when he discovered that Britain and the United States had tried to recruit Iraq (an Arab State) into the Baghdad Pact, an infuriated Nasser launched a major propaganda event to prevent Arab States from ever aligning themselves with the West. As seen from past leaders such as Adolf Hitler, uniting the people against a common enemy is a powerful tool. Primarily, it instills a sense of ultra-nationalism within the people. Secondarily, uniting people over a common enemy generally leads the people to a common goal: abolishing said enemy. By selling Israel as a threat, Nasser managed to unite the Egyptians and other Arab states (such as Syria) together to eliminate Israel. Despite all of Nasser’s efforts, Egypt still had a major problem: it had few resources, thus it had a restricted potential. Egypt’s best hope to surpass these limitations is to be the political heart of the Arab world. So, this became Nasser’s main goal…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Historically, it has been shown that wars are cyclical and are usually motivated by the negative outcome of an earlier war and for the same reasons as the original war. This causes that the country that today is attacked, in some time becomes an aggressor country. The clearest example of this is in European history from 1850 to the present. Since then great wars have been unleashed which, fundamentally, are motivated by the same original conflict. This could be a possibility more than we can not be one hundred percent sure. Currently the Civil War in Syria is going for a sixth consecutive year and when this war is over, it may be that the Syrian government rises and becomes the aggressor or Start a war against those who caused so many deaths and…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Oil Embargo

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Sarah Horton’s paper on the 1973 Oil Crisis, a war, known as the “Suez-Sinai War,” broke out between newly founded Israel and an Arabian nation that…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays