Purpose Of Egypt To Attack Israel By Anwar Sadat

Good Essays
Analysis
In writer analysis The first actor behind this war is Egypt president Anwar Sadat. To anwering Essay Question of what is the purpose of Egypt to attacking Israel is because Anwar Saddat want to taking back their National Pride and Sinai Territory after defeated by Israel in Six Days War 1967. Egypt economic was not stable after Six Days War 1967 also Egypt lost almost half their military power and Anwar Saddat Wants to taking back Sinai region because is very important for Egypt. During the period there is a small conflict with Egypt and Israel on Sinai territory after Israel controling Sinai and they call “Atrisi War”. In Atrisi war Egypt was attacked by Israel from Sinai region but Egypt attacking them too. This is very dangerous
…show more content…
So Egypt leader wants to taking back their national pride. This is one of the purpose why Anwar Sadat wants to revenge to Israel under his leadership. To attack Israel once again Anwar Saddat create their grand strategy. Saddat wants to gather power from Arab Nation like Syria also Saudi Arabia to support him on the battle with Israel. Syria is one of Egypt allies under the leadership of Al-Assad they are becoming a serious threat for Israel also with Yordania. But after Six Days War there is a difference understanding about military force towards Arab Countries also Egypt and Syria. Because USA and Israel didn't think about their military capability to create a modern warfare against Israel. But after Six Days War Egypt also Syiria had a military cooperation with Soviet Union. Soviet Union send their weapon also military equipment for their allies and support them for this war. Because they want to protect their allies from USA and suppot Anwar Saddat grand strategy. (Oktorino, …show more content…
Anwar Saddat was the main actor of this war because some economic problem and national prides in his country he think that it will be a good strategy if they attacking Israel. This war is about reclaiming Sinai territory and inviting Syrian to taking back Golan Mountain from Israel. After this war Israel and Egypt negotiated and recover their diplomacy relations And their made Camp David agreement. So many Arab Country didn't like Egypt because they call Egypt a traitor under Anwar Saddat regime (Staff H. , 2009). But we can see there is no big war between Arab Nation and Israel in the future. This war is a historical for the both side because they can almost defeat Israel for the first time. But there is no winner in this War, the both sides has a big loss and also Egypt can reach their interest to taking back Sinai

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Six Day War

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This announcement has its groundwork centred on the truth that the one foremost exchange the Six Day conflict made on the vicinity was once in reshaping of middle East politics via the acquisition of the Sinai Peninsula, the West bank, and the Golan Heights via the Israelis. The founding of the Zionist state of Israel in lands considered with the aid of Muslims, Christians, and Israelis alike as holy land, created tremendous anxiety in the area. The Six Day conflict escalated this conflict and shifted the focus from the existence of the Jewish state to the occupied territories and the Palestinian refugees. The outcome of this used to be a political shift via each the Arabs and the Israelis that left little room for compromise. For the Israeli, the Six day struggle created an interior debate in Israel over the desire to maintain the land as a part of Eretz Israel and the talents safety and peace returning the land might create.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ISIS Case Study

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, it is not enough to defeat ISIS, U.S must cooperate with other actors. Pick up and choose is a new question of Obama administration for a chessman to attack ISIS. Although ISIS is Sunnis terrorist group (Stern & Berger, 2015) and Shiite conflicts with Sunnis, Iran and Hezbollah are a dilemma. Iran has a large of Shiite Muslim and Hezbollah also fight with ISIS (Hilleary, 2015). However, they may bring a challenge for U.S. Firstly, Iran was backed by Russia and China, thus, it is not active in case of cooperating with U.S. Secondly, to gain the cooperation with Iran, U.S must loose economic sanctions and the nuclear program of Iran.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This fighting has destabilised that area of the region and has other countries to start picking sides in this expanding conflict. The problem is there are many different groups all trying to get their voice and NATO support to fight for their individual causes. The United States position in regards to ISIS is to eliminate their threat to the area and to promote a free and democratic Iraq and Syria. But, the Russian and Iranian governments have supported the Al Assad government in as much as attacking the rebels and militias that the United States has been supporting. This has caused an increase in near misses between the two…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Syria is led by president Assad but Hezbollah and Iraqi shia militants have power. The economy is in ruins and fear of ISIS has weaken Assad 's support.” (Black). Syria is being fought over by three political groups and the most stable is losing support. The constant fighting is weaken the economy. “Saudi Arabia government is like a monarch they supported sunni rebels in syria and Iraq.” (Black).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tunisia Arab Spring

    • 1599 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For the United States the idea of a potential Egyptian revolution was alarming because of Egypt’s crucial stability for the region. Therefore, the uncertainty of the potential threats form successor regimes was very concerning giving that President Hosni Mubarak has been an ally of the United States for many years. The United States aimed to maintain their special relationship in which they commonly opposed the Muslim Brotherhood and supported the undemocratic regime as long as it kept the Muslim Brothers at bay. Every year, more than a billion of dollar was given to Egypt for aid mostly military. However, as soon as the government’s public support for the Egyptian president was removed, Mubarak resigned and consequently ended his 30…

    • 1599 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    174). Israel gained new territory in the 1967 war and ever since the occupied land has been used as either a bargaining chip in peace negotiations, or as justification for more violence. The Yom Kippur War was also significant as it was used as justification for massive increase in OPEC oil prices which had ramifications around the world (Gelvin 2007, p. 181). The invasion of Lebanon reflects the manner in which neighbouring countries become dragged into the conflict. Palestinian guerillas were fighting to reclaim their lands from Jordan, but were expelled by King Hussein in order to regain favour with Israel.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Considering the proposal, Israel agreed about the Sinai Peninsula while expressing different views about the West Bank and the Gaza. Following the disagreement, Sadat grew frustrated and expressed dissatisfaction as well as showing the want to cut all talks with Israel. Sensing a major conflict, Carter “decided to invite both Begin and Sadat to Camp David”, (Carter 45). This is significant because Carter wanted to prove the world that America was able to resolve conflicts through diplomacy rather than war. As he states, “My next act was almost one of desperation”, (Carter 45) Carter saw no other option than bringing the two faces; charismatic Sadat and conservative Begin to the same table.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Arab-Israel war should have been a war without any costs, and thus many people believed that Arab states would have won. At the end of the war, the state of Israel had been victorious and the Arab League was defeated. The are many reasons to why four Arab states were unable to win the war, but the most notable reason is that they were no equipped for battle. These Arab states are not only new independent states, but were also states that had never gone to war making them such a weak opponent. In 1949, Israel after winning the war, signed several armistice agreements with its neighboring Arab states to halt the conflict between them.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ISIS Conflicts

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We are at war, does he not notice that there are terrorist we are fighting? If ISIS continues to rule over parts of the Middle East prices on certain goods in America will rise, such as gas, a major import from the Middle East. We need to finish the job, Utah State Representative spoke on the issue of ISIS with fox news and stated “They want death and destruction to the United States of America.” Is this what we are waiting for? The United States Military should have attacked them in January. The mission is to stop ISIS which is now spreading to Syria where we need to now enter to have an efficient…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    FDR could use this to his advantage, and by increasing national security, he could also prepare for the possibility of war in the future. Because Americans were still isolationists, they believed that having a strong navy could protect them from war. Leaders such as Charles Lindbergh, who was a part of the America First group (a group against going to war), said that those who thought that war was inevitable were showing true defeatism (Document H). He also claimed that building a strong military and navy would protect them from even having to go to war. That being said, most Americans thought that pouring money into their protection made a lot of sense, but for different reasons than FDR.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays