Aristotle's Golden Mean Analysis

Improved Essays
Analyzing and Applying Aristotle’s Golden Mean
Aristotle’s Golden Mean was summarized wonderfully by Christopher Brown, “Aristotle’s Golden Mean is the concept of the perfect medium between extremes” (Brown). According to Aristotle, moderation is a keystone of virtuous behavior. Moderation is relative to each person. Aristotle suggests that each person temper their own styles and extremes (Adler and Proctor II). For example, if a person was naturally easy to anger, then that person should strive to moderate their anger but not to eliminate it entirely. In addition to relative moderation, the temperance should be suitable for the circumstance (Adler and Proctor II). Meaning, there are times that reasonably call for anger or other emotions which fall within the excess category. The three categories of behavior are excess, mean, and deficit.
Acting moderately can change many relationships that one might have. For instance, my relationship with my significant other might not be as strong if I was more moderate in my expression of affection. In my
…show more content…
Generally, moderation or balance in emotional expression will not be of any detriment to the individual. Excess can be used to show significance, as demonstrated above. Moderation would remove the significance of personal relationships. The concept of moderating yourself uniquely and the ability to use an extreme, when it is necessary, allows for a diverse society. Excesses and deficits can have a profound impact on the world. For example, most major scientists, inventors, writers, and political figures of the past have been reported as being extremely excessive or majorly deficit in their expressions. Those individuals placed their focus away from socially accepted moderation and amazing things were produced as a result. Overall, Aristotle’s Golden Mean is a good concept but a difficult one to put into

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If you handle the conflict in an unhealthy manner it can cause cracks and hatreds in the relationship. Handling the conflict in a healthy approach it forms trust, reinforce bonds and it advances our understanding of one another. Unhealthy ways to handle a conflict can often cause several issues. It can cause a person to withdrawal, have quick-tempered or upsetting reactions and sometimes a fear of rejection. Handling the conflict in a healthy manner can cause a willingness to forgive someone, forget the whole situation and capability to find…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it is possible to reconcile them in some sense. In my opinion, Aristotle’s idea that happiness depends on the character but also that happiness is objective not subjective, is one of the complementary elements of Parfit’s theory of objective list. Parfit’s theory ignores the agent’s character and his or her will by claiming that objective goods can benefit people independently of their attitudes toward them. Since having the goods in the list without awareness does not provide the best life to that person, character should be counted as an important element of the best life. Also, in the list of goods there are some goods about the character and these goods are not contingent, they should be gained by the agent.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Usually, cultural and personal influences influence an individual’s perspective to the most appropriate or ethically correct course of action. Utilitarianism does not extinguish this completely as these factors would continue to influence individual views to what cause would create happiness. However, it offers the people the ability to view what is morally right from a combined assessment of what is ethically right or evil, instead of on a limited, personal level. It creates the link for an individual to identify what actions cause others happiness or pain and shows that situations are not limited to the affects on us, only. While he consideration of others is needed to decide which action is the most ethically right, it cannot be limited to that.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us. Some strengths of utilitarianism include the importance of happiness, consideration of the greater good, and relevance of intention. Meanwhile, Some disadvantages of utilitarianism are that it is not the only thing of value and the end doesn't justify the means. Mill and Kant have opposite views points, Kant thinks people can decide what is moral through reason alone and Mill thinks that through experience people can determine what is good or evil based on pleasure and…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the positive versus negative feelings state. Happiness may serve as an example of the first one, and anger as one for the second group. The theory posits that it is valence that causes changes in cognition and then results in various effects on JDM (Bachkirov 2015; Lerner & Keltner 2000). As it is a general approach towards affect, specific emotions and their specific effects on judgement and choice are not looked at. Rather, emotions of the same valence, like, for example, happiness and pride, are assumed to have similar effects (Lerner, Li, Valdesolo & Kassam 2015) and the question of whether two emotions of the same valence might effectuate different outcomes is mostly ignored (Lerner & Keltner…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Its focal points are in fairness and a making just decisions. Important to realize, utilitarianism even takes into account a person’s feelings or social constraints. Yet, if those conflicts interfere with the greatest amount of happiness then a utilitarian would basically tell you to get over it. An example of this would be if there…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our overall assessment of the possible outcomes of our actions can affect what we choose to do, or not do, even if it is unconsciously done. Once again, anger and fear tend to have differing influences on our decision-making. Anger diminishes a person’s perception of risk, while fear increases it. Angry people are also more likely to locate control within people, whereas fearful people are more likely to locate it in situations. In a rather strange pairing, when people feel either happy or angry they are more likely to expect positive outcomes, though in an impaired way with anger.…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It will not affect as much because it will have a good side effect that will benefit other. It all depends on whether more well-being is achieve. Act-utilitarianism is a theory of not killing, stealing, committing…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, it is possible to experience happiness in the wrong ways, and also at the wrong times. “But isn’t happiness good for us?”, is everyone’s favorite question to ask. Most will say that being upset or angry most of the time may have more cons than pros. Although the overflowing feeling of sadness and anger can eventually lead to mental illnesses such as depression, a balance of negative and positive emotions is necessary to fulfill the full potential of proper human development. Many people have the wrong idea of happiness;…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays