Aristotle 's The Nicomachean Ethics Essay

761 Words 4 Pages
In the third book of his publication, “The Nicomachean Ethics”, the philosopher Aristotle elaborates on the arguments which he has presented concerning moral virtues, and invokes the concepts of voluntary and involuntary actions, choice, and responsibility to support his claims. The first segment within Book III of The Nicomachean Ethics concentrates on the conditions required for a person to either praise or blame another individual with regards to the actions that the other party has undertaken. On the aforesaid matter, Aristotle suggests that individuals should be praised when the hardships associated with their actions result in noteworthy successes; while on the reverse, also states that people should be blamed when their endeavours are futile with regards to achieving certain objectives. Furthermore, Aristotle also stresses the importance of contextualizing the actions undertaken by individuals when praise or blame are about to be imposed; this factor being because the circumstances influencing activities can alter the true incentive which caused the action itself. Central to Aristotle’s criteria regarding this matter is the role of logic in decision making, and the ability to make calculated choices to successfully overcome the obstacles which are presented to individuals, with wise actions being worthy of praise, and foolish actions being worthy of blame. In essence, Aristotle’s method regarding the conditions for which blame and praise can be appropriately applied…

Related Documents