Unfortunately, immigration …show more content…
An experiment conducted by Erwing, Walter et al say that, “1.6 percent of immigrants males age 18-39 are in jail, contrasted with 3.3 percent of the native-born. This disparity in jailing rates has existed for at least 20 years, as shown by data from the 1980, 1990, and 2000 decennial censuses. In each of those years, the jailing rates of the native-born were anywhere in the range of two to five times higher than that of immigrants. In 2010 the census data shows that jailing rates among the young, less educated Mexican, Salvadoran, and Guatemalan men who make up the main part of the unapproved population are much lower than the jailing rate among native-born young men without a high-school diploma” (Erwing, Walter et al. pg.1). Supporting Erwing et al, in their research Stowell et al, found that past studies on immigrant populations were limited, specifically, there was minimal research done throughout the United States. Therefore, the research that cast immigrants as facilitators of crime was definitively invalid (Stowell, et al. pg.895). Butcher and Piehl also did the same research as Erwing, et al, in their studies they look at the jailing rates for men aged 18-40 in the 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses. In every year, immigrants are less likely to be put in jail than natives with the gap broadening every decade. By 2000, immigrants have jailing rates that are one-fifth those of the native born …show more content…
Therefore, high levels of immigrant populations are actually correlated with decreases in crime levels as opposed to increases, and this fact remained true even when accounting for other variables such as neighborhood dynamics, ethnic cultures, and socioeconomic status of residents of the communities and neighborhoods in question (MacDonald, et al. pg.195-196). In accordance with MacDonald, et al, there was another research made by Wadsworth Tim how found that cities with more noteworthy development in immigrant or new immigrant populations somewhere around 1990 and 2000 had a tendency to have more extreme decreases in homicide and robbery rates (Wadsworth). Wadsworth looked at specific patterns of homicide and robbery when analyzing criminal activity and only in cities where the population was over 50,000. Data regarding population demographics was also used to determine the rates of immigration in these cities and how many immigrants were projected to live in urban areas during the periods of interest (Wadsworth pg.543). He also supports MacDonald, about the crime and immigrant’s levels saying that immigrants are actually associated with reduced crime levels. Wadsworth notes that there was an actual decrease in crime over the