The program of enhanced interrogation was approved under the Bush administration in 2002 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. During the time of these series of attacks on the United States, the country was sent into a frenzy about the security of the country as as well as trying to find out why this had happened. When the CIA proposed the idea of enhanced interrogation, the idea was presented in such a way that it was shown that enhanced interrogation was not harmful in the long run and could provide information that was “unique”, “otherwise unavailable” and “largely responsible for preventing a subsequent attack within the United States” as stated MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN A. RIZZO SENIOR DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE. The CIA had misled the White House in what some of the techniques they were using behind closed doors. Even though the CIA included waterboarding as one of the techniques in the US Army Field Manual on Interrogation. The effectiveness of this technique has shown little positive responses in getting new and relevant
The program of enhanced interrogation was approved under the Bush administration in 2002 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. During the time of these series of attacks on the United States, the country was sent into a frenzy about the security of the country as as well as trying to find out why this had happened. When the CIA proposed the idea of enhanced interrogation, the idea was presented in such a way that it was shown that enhanced interrogation was not harmful in the long run and could provide information that was “unique”, “otherwise unavailable” and “largely responsible for preventing a subsequent attack within the United States” as stated MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN A. RIZZO SENIOR DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE. The CIA had misled the White House in what some of the techniques they were using behind closed doors. Even though the CIA included waterboarding as one of the techniques in the US Army Field Manual on Interrogation. The effectiveness of this technique has shown little positive responses in getting new and relevant