Animal Welfare Act Essay

Improved Essays
Introduction
This paper explores the focus of animals owned as property. It discusses what harmful acts we do upon them such as being test subjects for the safety for humans, personal use, and consumption. An Organization named PETA was used to grow awareness and what people could do for animals and try to stop or benefit the animal in their temporary environment. The purpose of the Animal Welfare Act was to ensure animals some form of right since technically they do not have official rights because of not having characteristics as humans. I discuss an idea of animals being aware forming guilt to people and how society reacts for something was stopped because animals were not use in the formality for us.
Animal Property Aspects and Activists
…show more content…
There are creatures internationally involved in experimentation that leads to excruciating amount of pain. The lists of animals affected goes on and on but mice are deliberately the most common subjects to be tested because they are easy to maintain and genetically close to human behavioral characteristics. The problem is that animals are intentionally living property and activists are appose to the idea of any living creature being bought for some one else’s satisfaction, such as use for science, products that humans use for any type of matter, and educational purposes. PETA is one key stakeholder to grow awareness to people to save the creatures being harmed, for this instance, mice. PETA held “Investigations inside the laboratories” gathering information of what had happen to the mice during the experimentation process and led to similarities to cruelty by the injuries of testing: brain drilling, emotional distress, sickness, and amputation without any sort of medication for the relief of their pain. Activists are protesting to the companies’ acts or research labs in campuses for the stop of testing in animals and reaching for a new legislation. According to Ritter animals have always been property since it is written in the law but animal welfare acts are in favor, to have assurance that …show more content…
It is propose that way because of the symbolic meaning we put ourselves in with other species. We assume we are the alphas and the other animals as lower than us, regarding to the portrayal, we consume them because we are in control. The issues are exactly the same from the approach that activists oppose to why it stabilize us as a society. The movement is characterized as a social movement by the collective action it has gathered from the abolitionists and welfarism activists to change the treatment towards animals or none in captivity. People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into. Some protest in peaceful acts in a way to get the media to have a broad source for recruitment to fight for the cause getting the attention from those who cause the cruelty to animals. An idea that emerged that Smith talked about, was we faced the idea of “Anthropomorphism” that animals are aware what is happening and the animals are smart enough to know what is going on and contribute emotions of what they are going through (Smith pg.8). That cause guilt to workers or anyone who caused an animal physical pain causing organizations to stand up for animals incapable protecting themselves. People

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The argument rallies for the changes to dogfighting laws, provisions for companion animals, and protecting farm raised animals. It's believed that stouter penalizes be into place for people involved in dog fighting events. If people watching and gambling on the dogs would be more punished like the owner's such events might be alleviated. The author believes that provisions for companion animals should be made if the request is reasonable there should be laws against animal farms. Animals on these farms are hand feed, so, therefore, they are trusting of humans.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal welfare is how well the animals should be treated. Michael C. Appleby explains animal welfare as, “Ethical concern over the quality of life of animals” (19). If one believes in animal welfare then does one believe in animal rights also? Animals get mistreated in different settings whether circuses, zoos or factories. According to the “Animal Rights Debate” Rich…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals don’t deserve to be tested or harm in anyway because they didn’t do anything. Animals should have at least some rights so we can improve how animals are abused, tested, and disrespected by humans. Would you want your pet to be taken away for testing? Would you want to watch the brutality of it? If not, then why let another animal go through this.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Companies use animals as well, for the products they have come up with, scientists test on animals' eyelids and the animals get blind or poisoned by cosmetics. There are several companies who sell cruelty free make up and that type of makeup is not tested on animals it is tested on vitro tests or clinical studies on humans. Cruel beauty points out, " Every year cosmetics companies in the United States kills millions of animals while testing their products...among... Inhumane practices is the injection of caustic substances into the eyes...of living rabbits to test irritation. They break necks and backs..." (Cruel Beauty). While animals are getting tested from the scientists the animals are getting tortured and their skin gets irritated by the products that makes animals die from the despair they get put through.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cruelty On Animal Rights

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They point out that anticruelty laws exist to protect animals from harsh treatment. Acts such as the diving mules would not be allowed to continue if the public thought cruelty was involved. They argue that what activists view as entertainment actually results in public education about animals. As the public learns to appreciate animals, the animals’ interests will be better served. Perhaps the best example of this is today’s changing…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, scientists have created mice with a weaker immune system therefore making them more susceptible to harmful diseases. The harsh reality of animal testing is often not known by the public. This practice needs to be forbidden in every country across the world because what is happening is cruel and unnecessary. Animal experimentation began as early as 450 BCE when Alcmaeon of Croton performed a vivisection on a dog. These early tests were done mainly for…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even humans, on a biological level, are animals themselves. With that being stated, the main argument boils down ethics, with each and every person’s morals playing an important part. I, personally, am against animal abuse, so consequently I believe that this issue should be addressed more firmly by people, by the law, and by the world. I, as a pet owner think that animal cruelty is one of the most wicked things in the world. People with good intentions but ultimately neglect and abuse animals, I am more lenient to, because people who fall under this category generally cannot help the situation they are in, or just ignorant on the issue.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ten Trusts Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This has led humans to believe they are not part of the animal kingdom. Us humans are very cruel to animals. We use animals to test all these vaccines and keep them caged. Some animals are used just for our entertainment. We breed animals and use them to feed our vast population.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goodall also states that when coming to the realization that animals have the same right as we do to inhabit the earth, but there is a big communication barrier between us. This barrier might prevent humans to further understand what steps humans need to take in order to understand animal suffrage. Additionally, there are some exceptions for treatment of all living things. People will discuss that even the smallest insect should also receive the same treatment. I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics