I believe the narrator interrupted her narration to correct the judge’s jaded, coldly professional misunderstanding of her mother who once stood before him, for she is not just another defendant, but her mother, and a victim of domestic abuse that should not be ignored. The narrator describes this abuse as her mother endured it for weeks, healing and waiting for a response from the routine submissions to the judge (1-8). When the mother was in front of the judge in this particular scene remembered by the daughter, the mother wore a “homemade forties hairdo” (6-7). Her mother’s hairdo and makeup indicate that she was not only suffering physically but also financially, as her hair was homemade and not done by a salon worker. In addition to evidence of physical abuse and poverty, the narrator also implies that her mother was sexually abused. This sexual abuse can be inferred from the daughter describing that her mother’s “holy of holies [was] healing” (8). From my knowledge of Christianity, I know that the Holy of Holies refers to the place where God dwelt in the Old Testament. This place was known to be a sanctuary for God with an inner room separated with curtains where He would directly dwell. Because God was said to dwell in this place, the sanctuary was seen as sacred and highly respected, so sacred in fact that only the high priest was allowed to enter it on a Jewish holiday called Yom Kippur (but only after he was known to be clean, spiritually and literally). If anyone else entered the sanctuary, it was said that this person violated the law and dishonored God. In the same way, the mother’s “holy of holies” referred to her reproductive system, for it is vital for life and therefore is demanding of respect. To violate or abuse a person sexually would desecrate their reproductive system, undervaluing its purpose and acting contrary to law. Not to mention, a woman’s reproductive system is literally inside their bodies, so just as God
I believe the narrator interrupted her narration to correct the judge’s jaded, coldly professional misunderstanding of her mother who once stood before him, for she is not just another defendant, but her mother, and a victim of domestic abuse that should not be ignored. The narrator describes this abuse as her mother endured it for weeks, healing and waiting for a response from the routine submissions to the judge (1-8). When the mother was in front of the judge in this particular scene remembered by the daughter, the mother wore a “homemade forties hairdo” (6-7). Her mother’s hairdo and makeup indicate that she was not only suffering physically but also financially, as her hair was homemade and not done by a salon worker. In addition to evidence of physical abuse and poverty, the narrator also implies that her mother was sexually abused. This sexual abuse can be inferred from the daughter describing that her mother’s “holy of holies [was] healing” (8). From my knowledge of Christianity, I know that the Holy of Holies refers to the place where God dwelt in the Old Testament. This place was known to be a sanctuary for God with an inner room separated with curtains where He would directly dwell. Because God was said to dwell in this place, the sanctuary was seen as sacred and highly respected, so sacred in fact that only the high priest was allowed to enter it on a Jewish holiday called Yom Kippur (but only after he was known to be clean, spiritually and literally). If anyone else entered the sanctuary, it was said that this person violated the law and dishonored God. In the same way, the mother’s “holy of holies” referred to her reproductive system, for it is vital for life and therefore is demanding of respect. To violate or abuse a person sexually would desecrate their reproductive system, undervaluing its purpose and acting contrary to law. Not to mention, a woman’s reproductive system is literally inside their bodies, so just as God