Analysis Of Murder State, By Brendan Lindsay

Improved Essays
In some schools across America, the mass murder of Native Americans in California during the nineteenth century is taught as an inevitable, necessary evil (Discussion). However, this notion is false. The mass murder of the Native Americans was systematic and calculated, carried out by white settlers through attacks on the lives, livelihoods, homes, and cultures of the natives. According to both Raphael Lemkin and the United Nations, these actions were genocidal. In the work, Murder State, by Brendan Lindsay, Lindsay, using the definitions created by Lemkin and the United Nations, effectively categorizes this mass extermination of the Native Americans in California as a genocide. Both Raphael Lemkin and the United Nations stated that a genocide involves “a conspiracy” or “intent” to annihilate a group of people based on “national, ethnical, racial, or religious” background (“Genocide”, UN). As white settlers emigrated to California, their inveterate fear of the Native Americans, their belief in the “savagery, depravity, and racial inferiority” of the Natives, and their desire for the Natives’ …show more content…
He does so using the definitions formed by Raphael Lemkin and the United Nations. The Native Americans were killed, raped, kidnapped, stolen from, and treated like animals (Lindsay 165, 210). All of this was done by Euro-American settlers to bring about their extermination (Lindsay 165). The Euro-Americans’ intent to kill, desire to extirpate anything or anyone associated with natives, and need to prevent Indians from working demonstrate the genocide Native peoples faced. Although this genocide was one of the most horrific events in American history, the Euro-Americans failed to completely exterminate the Native Americans. Now, Native peoples and cultures across the country are strong, present, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rwanda Genocide Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Genocide is defined by the deliberate intention to kill and severely harm groups of ethnic & religious groups. Characteristics of the genocide are brutal, cruel, deliberate, and cold-blooded. I don’t see why you want to, for example, erase an entire group of people (Christians) in the Great Persecution. Or why would you even think about massacring the people who live in your own nation and are your people (Tutsi) and even rape the women. Genocide explained for the Rwanda genocide is that the Hutus began slaughtering the Tutsis in the African country of Rwanda.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Indian Genocide

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The extermination of American Indians has always been a sensitive issue. The massive depopulation of the Indigenous peoples in the Americas after 1492 to the Removal Era (1830-1950’s) seems like a clear-cut case of the genocide. Some believe that the United States’ action towards Indians was deplorable but never genocidal in certain areas. Many believe that California Indians were the victims of genocide from the Anglo Americans and Spanish. Yet, the genocide of Indians east of the Mississippi River has always been a hotly debated situation.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criteria Of A Genocide

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genocide Task Portfolio Essay There has been multiple genocides in this world some are unapproved or denied but people still say they are genocide. What is a genocide? A genocide has a lot of criterias, the first one is (a) killing members of a group (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. In this genocide study, we will talk about the Myanmar people. The Myanmar were the victims in this genocide.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He takes a different spin on this time in history; calling out Europeans for torturing and killing the Native American people for gold and resources. Zinn also points out the beginnings of institutionalized racism in the Americas. He explains that the reason why he expresses this history in this way is because for a long time this genocide has been ignored, and people need to see it for what it is. Zinn states, “…the treatment of heroes (Columbus) and their victims (the Arawaks)…acceptance of conquest and murder in the name of progress…the past is told from the point of view of governments, conquerors…as if they…represent the nation as a whole…” (Zinn 9). Zinn feels that the Europeans who have conquered these lands praise the so-called “heroes” like Columbus and Las Casas in order to justify the genocide that they caused.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was not honor that came to mind when Magawisa told her story no it was horror. Frederick Turner in his “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,” writes about who really was the savages. He says, “the frontier had to meet its Indian question, its question of the disposition of the public domain” (Turner). The question of what do the Puritan do with the Native American’s. Through Magawisca’s story, it is clearly described that what they did is killing most if not all of them and then claim their land.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Covered in Article Seven, crimes against humanity covers some components of the genocide, such as causing serious bodily harm or killing members of a group through torture, sexual slavery, and food deprivation. The definition of crimes against humanity also includes the forced relocation of a group, coined as ethnic cleansing (Anderson 2014, pg. 7). However, unlike the definition of genocide, crimes against humanity fails to account for the efforts of the European Americans to exterminate the Native American population. Rather, it seems to suggest that the European Americans wanted the Natives to simply assimilate, rather than be destroyed.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The whites are against the Indians because of their beliefs. In the whites’ eyes, all Indians do is steal, scalp, kidnap, and murder. In comparison, in the Indians eyes, all the whites do is steal their land, kill their people, and cheat them of their belongings. This story displays both sides evenly; Richter explains and gives supportive evidence towards whites hating Indians, and vice versa. On pages 38 and 39, the Tuscarawas Indians tell a story of the white murdering and scalping innocent Indians who tried to adapt to their culture.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A famous historian by the name of, Jose Vasconcelos, once wrote on how Mexicans saw the whites as “monsters who defy the laws of nature”. White settlers had come to take control of this land that did not belong to them, and while trying to claim control of the land they raped and killed innocent women and children. Destroyed hundreds villages filled with innocent people. All these horrible crimes because of dream, a goal, which the United States had; known as Manifest Destiny. This theory or goal destroyed thousands of people’s lives.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Imperialism thread and comment acts of terrorism through the mass murder of the people. Native American was slaughtered and beheaded. The violence was depicted as a source of fear to control the attitudes of the Native American, The Spanish political goals were to take over the county and report back to the European Empire all of the riches that was present in the land. Cortez saw the territorial to be a great opportunity for potential capitalism and growth not only for Spain, but for himself. (Elliott p.3).…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his account, de Las Casas describes the cruel scenes he encountered in the land of Hispaniola. Once on the Indians’ turf, the Christians were said to have eaten the Indians’ food, beaten and attacked the Indians for no reason, and assaulted the Indian ruler’s wife . All of these unprovoked acts contributed to the loathing of the Christians by the Indians, thus resulting in the Indian people’s negative attitudes towards the Christian people. Naturally, these events would leave the Indians wanting to get rid of the foreigners; the Indian people then decided to kill in self-defense. The Spaniards, described as “enemies of the human race” , heard of this, and joined in the unjustified slaughter of the Indians; de Las Casas states that “the Spaniards made a rule among themselves that for every Christian slain by the Indians, they would slay a hundred Indians” .…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays