Similarities Between Napoleon Bonaparte And Frederick The Great

Superior Essays
William T. Sherman a historical icon that can be ranked in the same category as Napoleon Bonaparte and Frederick the Great is a great is an absolute accomplishment. A military genius and mastermind that would deliver the final death blow to the South and the Confederacy. Burke Davis shows the memory of Sherman with these momentous accolades. Sherman indeed entitled to these honors, not only a master of strategy but also a master of human manipulation, and understanding. Sherman from the beginning of the war knew this was not going to be some fast and easy victory for anyone, yet knew that his war must be waged all out no holds bar in order to achieve success. Burke Davis clearly affirms the fact that Sherman was well oriented with war and …show more content…
For miles around the country was light as day… the flames shooting up for hundreds of feet into the air” With the nearby army band playing, he would tell his brother “It was like fiddling over the burning of Rome.” Regardless of the fact that Sherman felt for the Southern civilians of Atlanta he felt that he must do whatever it took to make war as terrible as possible. Rivers and Davis’s books both agree on this fact. Rivers will cite Sherman in saying “We cannot change the hearts of those people of the South, but we can make war so terrible that would they will realize the fact that, still they are mortal and should exhaust all peaceful remedies before they fly to war.” As well as Davis citing Sherman in response to Atlanta Mayor James Calhoun in his protest to Sherman’s evacuation of Atlanta’s civilians, “you cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty and you cannot refine …show more content…
Both would point out very specific aspects that Sherman would organize to ensure it would in fact be the “death blow”. Davis mentions a telegraph sent from Sherman to U S Grant. “Until we can repopulate Georgia, it is useless to occupy it, but the utter destruction if its roads, houses and people will cripple their military resources… I can make the march and make Georgia howl!” Rivers would agree with Davis with different emphasis but still with great importance. The last chance the Confederacy would have to “win” the war would be the election of a new President in 1984. Which look like a possibility with how unsuccessful Union campaigns had been and how successful Confederate fighting was. “Sherman also knew how much the stakes had been raised since his ability to capture Atlanta, and none more so than for the Lincoln’s re-election.” With the election of a new president shined the light of hope for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the Battle of Gettysburg, according to “The Killer Angels”, the southern generals made far too many mistakes that cost them the victory. In this battle, both sides made frequent mistakes, yet the South’s faults were far more fatal. These faults were the cause of the south’s loss of the battle, and the consequences that followed. The first disastrous mistake made by the South, was their faith in Jeb Stuart.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On November 15,1864,Major General William T.Sherman of the Union Army,started the March to The Sea to capture the port of Savannah. The march started in the captured city of Atlanta,Georgia. When he and his soldiers marched, there was no extra supplies,everyone considered it revolutionary in the annals of war. During the march,Sherman destroyed many union targets, such as transportation networks. Sherman therefore planned an operation that has been compared to the modern principles of burned ground warfare, or total war.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Giavanna Hunt Mrs. Schools APUSH 18 December 2017 Antietam Book Review Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam by James McPherson September 17, 1862 is remembered as the bloodiest day in American history. On this fateful day during the American Civil War, Union and Confederate soldiers clashed in Sharpsburg, Maryland along the Antietam Creek. In total, approximately 23,000 American lives were lost on this gory day, including 12,400 Union soldiers and 10,300 Confederate soldiers. Although the Union claimed this battle as their victory, the Americans on both sides suffered great losses that changed the course of the Civil War and altered American history. In choosing to read this book, I knew that I would gain a greater understanding of the military strategies and actions performed by both the Rebels and the Yankees.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Donald’s thesis for his essay is that the South did not lose the war because of a lack of economic resources or poor leadership, but because the people wanted to keep their civil liberties during the war. Donald’s explanation of how the Southern soldiers were unwilling to have their civil liberties cut short by the government is a key reason why his reason is the strongest. If soldiers did not approve of actions of their officers, they would not do what they were told. This is the base of poor leadership.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr. Shaara takes the time to explore Longstreet’s personality and his skills as a military tactician. Shaara says that Longstreet finds it ridiculous that Confederate officers would rather die in battle than be considered to lack bravery. Longstreet knows anyone can die in battle and that it is more important to find the best way to achieve victory and execute on that plan. This is quite a contrast with the excitement General Pickett and his officers express to Longstreet when told of their mission to attack the Union center over a mile of open ground – clearly a suicidal…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    General Sherman moved into the South. He then led his Army of Tennessee and led them on a march to Atlanta, then through Georgia, and then up the East Coast. General Sherman brought the South down by ordering large-scale destruction. The importance of General Sherman's March to the Sea was to first destroy the South’s agreement and ability to continue the war, capture a sea port, and finally to act like allies with General Grant. The reason to act like him and Grant were allies is so he could trap one of the strong Confederate Armies.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The South undoubtedly needed as much support as they could because they were against a region where industrialism and railroads were booming. Moreover, Davis’ intelligence is heightened even further because infiltrating the fort pulled the southern states together, which leaves the North to figure out how to…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the height of the Civil War between the Northern Union and Confederate States of America, Union General William Tecumseh Sherman implemented a strategy of total war. The concept of total war called for expanding military targets to include civilian economic resources. General Sherman executed his strategy of total war in his infamous “march to the sea” in 1864. Total war had a devastating effect on the people of the South during the Civil war because it demolished their homes and livelihood. Total war mainly affected women, children, and men unable to serve in the military.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reading and Writing Assignment #3 Abraham Lincoln is arguably one of the United States’ greatest presidents. “Abraham Lincoln was the only president in American history whose entire administration as bounded by war” (xv). When he was elected into office tensions were already high and the southern states had already moved forward with the secession and called themselves the confederacy. Over the course of his term he saw ups and downs while dealing with Americas civil war. He became commander in chief since he was inaugurated and used that power as a military strategy.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General William T. Sherman’s March to the Sea really encompassed nearly the whole State of Georgia. Just as Jackson sought to wage war in an indirect fashion against the political will of the Union to maintain the war by near constant threats to the capitol and by typing up troops, Sherman sought to undermine the civilian population of the south in order to shirk Confederate forces in the Eastern Theater that confronted Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant in front of Richmond and Petersburg. The method by which he sought to shrink those forces was two-fold. First by threatening the women and children as well as livelihood of those on the home front, Confederate soldiers could be induced to desert the Confederate armies to get back home and…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a macedonian ruler that conquered all of Greece, Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, Egypt and part of persia in all of 15 years. He was the son of Philip of Macedonia. Adolf Hitlerwas the ruler of the Natzis during World War II. He had invaded and conquered Poland, Germany, Hungary, parts of Russia, France and more territories over the span of 11 years. Both men had come from totally different time periods and have totally different personalities, although the two men have three things in common.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln attempted to convey the notion that the war was for God’s will and that his “judgments are true and righteous altogether,” another biblical reference to Psalms 19:9. Just as the jeremiad offers redemption after identifying the crisis of God’s people, Lincoln offers both sides of the war the hope to “bind up the nation’s wounds” in order to “cherish a just and lasting peace.” Lincoln was conscious of the fact that the Southern states would not be quick to rejoin the Union after their defeat and the North would likely continue to condemn the South. Yet, by employing biblical references, he conveyed the message that any attempt, from either side, to hinder the reunification of the nation, was not a violation of the president’s wishes, but of God’s almighty will.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Perspectives

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Civil War was a pivotal moment in the United States’s history being a high point in a sectional discord that’s affects have continued to be evident in several issues in today’s society. As most wars, there’s at least two decidedly divided and biased sides to the story. With two perspectives coming from one country America had to decide how they wanted to remember this war. Being such a complex dispute with two very distinct viewpoints, each side had their personal view on the reasons for the war, the events throughout the war, and the effectiveness of reconstruction. Through extensive measures by multiple people, each side go their story out and shaped how others viewed the war decades after the fact, no matter how contrasting these memories…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grant and his men dug trenches and tunnels around the town for weeks and finally set off explosive barrels of black powder under the towns defenses. “Finally, on July 3, the town’s Confederate commander, Lt. Gen. John Pemberton, sent word he was ready to surrender his outnumbered garrison and the town in which the citizens had been reduced to eating dogs and cats—reportedly, even rats—because of the siege.” (3) Once Vicksburg surrendered it truly showed people that Grant was a man that could get things done. Grant used his superior leadership skills and military smarts to eventually overtake a fortified city. “In this remarkable letter, President Abraham Lincoln congratulates General Grant for an important victory -- the capture of Vicksburg, Mississippi, on July 4, 1863. Lincoln differed with Grant about how to handle the campaign, but when Grant pursued his own strategy successfully, Lincoln frankly admitted that Grant was right.”…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays