However minimum wage, “perhaps the most studied subject in economics today” according to Krugman has data that disagrees with these combatants. This data is an example of logos that Krugman uses in the article. This data comes from natural experiments, observations. These natural experiments are based off comparing the states that have raise minimum wage and those who do not raise the wage. The results show little if any negative effect on employment in minimum wage jobs. “This means that the argument they propose is invalid” according to the article, the evidence that oppose it is the very people that have minimum wage jobs. Krugman says in the article that humans are complex, and that complexity seems to be that modest increases in wages for the least- paid doesn’t necessarily reduce the number of jobs. In other words people don’t want to fire the workers that do the less desirable jobs over a few extra dollars an hour. I agree with Mr. Krugman, the argument that has opposed this proposal is invalid it has no grounds while we have research from decades of
However minimum wage, “perhaps the most studied subject in economics today” according to Krugman has data that disagrees with these combatants. This data is an example of logos that Krugman uses in the article. This data comes from natural experiments, observations. These natural experiments are based off comparing the states that have raise minimum wage and those who do not raise the wage. The results show little if any negative effect on employment in minimum wage jobs. “This means that the argument they propose is invalid” according to the article, the evidence that oppose it is the very people that have minimum wage jobs. Krugman says in the article that humans are complex, and that complexity seems to be that modest increases in wages for the least- paid doesn’t necessarily reduce the number of jobs. In other words people don’t want to fire the workers that do the less desirable jobs over a few extra dollars an hour. I agree with Mr. Krugman, the argument that has opposed this proposal is invalid it has no grounds while we have research from decades of