Now Or Never Bill Mckiibben Analysis

880 Words 4 Pages
In “Now or Never”, Bill McKibben uses an academic, yet casual, style while addressing the world on the topic of global warming. McKibben starts his essay by urging that what we do in preventing global warming will determine what kind of planet we leave behind for future centuries. The essay develops further by stating that global warming is scientifically sound. McKibben provides scientific research, showing that temperatures around the planet are on the rise. The essay takes a turn, however, when McKibben argues that global warming isn’t an environmental crisis but a moral one. He points out that a few degrees in temperature change does not cause an enormous problem for people’s daily lives since we can simply turn on the AC, making us blind to the outcome for future generations. Further, McKibben mocks our use of items, specifically SUVs. The essay states that even if ten percent of people changed their habit, not a single dent in global warming would be made, but instead, global warming would turn into a political issue. McKibben concludes his work with a powerful statement: global warming must become “a personal issue first”.
In “Now
…show more content…
For instance, many people partake in daily activities that contribute to global warming such as driving cars, utilizing coal powered energies, and the rapidly depleting forests that would otherwise increase oxygen levels. Furthermore, Mckibben’s assertion that global warming is a moral crisis is applicable to one’s decisions in preventing such a predicament.
For example, many people are compelled to purchase more fuel efficient vehicles, opt to recycle, and live in more efficient homes after exposure to informative works like McKibben's “Now or Never.” Therefore, the moral aspect of global warming still has the capability to inspire others thus allowing McKibben’s essay to remain relevant and controversial in modern

Related Documents