Analysis Of Nick Bostrom's Trilemma Analysis In The Controlation Argument

Improved Essays
Nick Bostrom in his trilemma analysis in the ‘simulation Argument’ provides a presentation on a likely possibility that we could be existing under computer simulation. Though he asserts that we might be living in a computer simulation, he does not directly argue so. He rather provides three propositions that seem highly unlikely and points out that one of them is almost definitely true. The first one states that the human species is most likely going to be extinct before the ‘post-human’ stage. In the second proposition, Bostrom argues that any posthuman civilization is highly unlikely to run a reasonable number of historical revolutionary simulations. He concludes with the third proposition by claiming that it's almost certain that we are …show more content…
In page 3, line 6, he provides his first assumption of substrate independence. In this claim, he argues that if we can model the mind with sufficient detail, similarly we can create artificial ones that can think in the same way we do. He further argues that if we could simulate the whole world with enough detail and feed the entire world with artificial minds we had created in sensory form inputs, then the artificial brains cannot determine whether they are in a simulation unless their creators provide them with the explicit knowledge to do so. Hence this helps in clarifying his claim that indeed there is the possibility of existing in a simulation without realizing …show more content…
However, there may be some sense in his argument regarding the same. We cannot ignore the fact that we are living in an era where technological advancements have taken a notch higher. The technological innovations have by far surprised everyone, and there seems that this is not about to stop. The man has developed ways in which they can cheat death through uploading their brain. Such trends as brain mapping have even been advanced in countries like the united states, ‘the Brain Initiative that the Obama administration funded. There are so many advancements in the creation of robots that can even socialize. So, we basically cannot overlook Bostrom idea by terming it bizarre. Therefore, there are some theoretical and technological implications which support Bostrom's idea that indeed we may be living in a simulation. Bostrom further asserts that we shouldn’t alter the way we live our lives due to this argument by believing that either of the three provisions is more probable like the other

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Churchlands then attempt to justify their own theory regarding how artificial intelligence might be possible. They assert that presently existing computers are not capable of cognitive ability as a result of the serial manner in which they process…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mynul Khan, the author of “Robots Won’t Just Take Jobs, They’ll Create Them”, wrote that technology is being used more, but there must be human labor to operate and maintain it because there is the chance that technology can malfunction (2016). When we use more technology we will need more people to help maintain it, which will create more jobs. This relates back to Pinker’s statement that technology will keep people smart because people will have to learn how to operate these machines, which will open a new area of what people can learn and increase their…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The speed driven world we live in has collapsed distance and time to the point where the average person a century ago wouldn’t recognize, believe, or begin to understand something simple and natural for people now, for example the world wide web. To the average person even only fifty years ago, the internet could be considered to fall under their umbrella of The Singularity because it’s an idea they couldn’t comprehend. Following the same logic, ideas that are currently unknowable have the potential to become a part of the human paradigm. Ideas in The Current Singularity can escape and become a reality. It would be foolish to assume that what we don’t know now dictates what we can never know.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steve Jobs: A True Hero

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thus, in a modern world filled with obstacles and challenges, Jobs found a way to leap over as many as he could. He improved society not by giving them a revolutionary computer device and system, but he gave them a role model. Jobs not only became a great American hero, he became an innovator that changed…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the little century of living, scientists have managed to create someone worth wild, computers. These devices have been equipped to receive and interpret data to complete the mission. On a global scale of higher development, this has caused heated debates about which is higher in intelligence between computers and humans. Scientist have only scratched the surface when it comes to this heated debate of superiority but soon we find out. The tension between artificial intelligence and the human mind has cause scientist all over the globe to critically think of who’s more dominant.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Better Than Human Essay

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Which tends to foreshadow the imperfections of humans and how robots are perfected to do things better. Quadrant B describes jobs that humans can not do but robots can. It explains how humans have trouble making one screw, but machinery can perfect that one screw and make thousands more. Quadrant C explains the new jobs created by automation including the jobs that we did not know we wanted done. It illustrates how intellect and advanced technology is these days and how it can progress the human race towards the future discovering new cures for diseases, as well as further advancing exploration in uncharted territories.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy has arose by the scientist on just how smart to make these robots; Oh Jun-ho of KAIST proposes the idea of proportioning a balance of the robot's intelligence and strength. Due to the inevitable age of this new technology, society need to accept the technology, but enforce the demand for practical and balanced…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then asks a question concerning the end of all this. I disagree with Carr in that Google is up to no good and his thought about artificial intelligence. Google has helped create the world that now we live in and I believe that their plans for the future will only help. By opening new ways for humans to access new information, we will only expand our knowledge about technology. I personally believe that artificial intelligence will take over, probably not in my lifetime but it will happen.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So wouldn’t that allow them to become sentient and create their own purpose?” or “If we get too interdependent on technology, wouldn’t that leave us open to hack/terrorist attacks?” Well, question three, you’re right on point. But first, let’s clarify the first two ideas. A one Miguel Nicolelis is highly skeptical of a time where robots would take over. Even though the possibilities with artificial intelligent technology may seem limitless, there’s one major roadblock that stands in its way. Human consciousness.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The connection of the previous arguments against the use of nuclear weapons to the requirements of both jus ad bellum and jus in bello is that nuclear weapons do not accomplish with the main purpose of Just War Tradition, which is preventing and saving innocent lives. The long-term dangers of radioactive fallout and environmental contamination potentially affect innocent people, allies, enemies, or even one’s own population. Hence, since the side effects of nuclear weapons can’t be measure or controlled, can’t be ever justifiable. The psychologist Eric Fromm supports part of this view by claiming that logic of the way that wars back in the day used to be, are not the same, nor hold for the same standards for modern nuclear wars. The pacifist position argues that the use of nuclear weapons will always be morally wrong because: “1) their use will result in widespread noncombatant deaths and 2) the destructive effects of such weapons will necessarily be out of proportion to any political or military objectives achieved” (p.208).…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays