Essay about Analysis Of Michael S. Gazzaniga 's The Ethical Brain

985 Words Dec 8th, 2016 4 Pages
There is no simple answer to the social dilemmas that are facing our society in the present day. One could spend days arguing reasons to support or oppose issues such as the morality of abortion, the existence of free will, or the feasibility of universal ethics. In Michael S. Gazzaniga 's book, The Ethical Brain, these controversial topics are discussed using a brain-based philosophy of life, commonly known as neuroethics. Although there are several advantages to solving such predicaments using a scientific approach, it is equally important to consider the personal and social implications of an ethical decision. For this reason, I partially agree with the statement that human beings should use neuroethics to deal ethically with social issues of disease, normality, morality, lifestyle, and the philosophy of living. Ethical dilemmas cannot be approached in a linear manner; rather, the solutions arise from understanding the potential impact of a situation from all angles, and working to minimize the negative repercussions.
Philosophers have long debated whether or not free will exists. This topic is crucial when considering the decision to penalize a criminal for a felony. Scientifically speaking, there is a difference between the brains of individuals, causing some people to be more aggressive than others. As Gazzaniga states in his book, "Whether through neurochemical imbalances or lesions, brain function can become distorted, perhaps explaining certain violent or criminal…

Related Documents