Agrippa 's Trilemm A Philosophical Dilemma Essay

751 Words Sep 3rd, 2015 4 Pages
To believe or not to believe- that is the central question that arises when addressing the philosophical problem of “Agrippa’s Trilemma”. Agrippa’s Trilemma is a philosophical dilemma that occurs when developing premises for an argument. The Trilemma specifically exposes arguments that are based on premises that can be easily negated. This is a critical aspect to consider in philosophy because; if there is good enough reason to believe the premises of an argument, then it comes to say that the conclusion of an argument is justifiable as well. Conversely, if an argument lacks substantial evidence to support the premises of an argument, then the conclusion of the argument shall be deemed not believable. Specific cases of the Trilemma include basing a conclusion off of an unjustified premise, using an argument with a circular structure, or using an infinite series of arguments. To bypass the difficulties presented by the Trilemma, three possible solutions can be implemented when making an argument: assuring the premises, guarding the premises, or discounting the premises. A solution to the first problem associated with Agrippa’s Trilemma, the problem of unjustified premises, is by creating an argument in which the premises for the argument are assured. To provide an example of an argument in which the premise is assured, imagine a professor that says, “Everyone knows that diamonds are carbon structures.” In saying this, the professor has significantly reduced the chances of…

Related Documents