Adolf Hitler And Putin Essay

Improved Essays
¬ Hitler’s European policy in the 1930's and Putin’s Eastern European Polices Since 2011
INTRODUCTION
Similarities and differences exist between what Adolf Hitler sought in central Europe in the 1930s to what Vladimir Putin is seeking in the former Soviet Union, more so Ukraine through the establishment of eastern European policies since 2011. Both the situations are characterized by an elected leader who turns into a dictator through successfully stroking powerful ethno-nationalism ideological policy to remain popular and relevant while reviving the economy from a crisis after a great national defeat and directing attention to co-nationals who have been severely left out of the borders as a consequence of a previous war (Cadier and Margot
…show more content…
For their implementation to be successful, it all depends on gas and oil exports. A reduction in price or a partial boycott is likely to bring a heavy blow to the economy of Russia, an incident that is likely to see the regime loses the support it currently enjoys. On the contrary, Hitler’s policies were essentially based on his political ideology and brutal force which implies that it was less dependent on and less vulnerable to international factors (McKenna 320). Unlike Hitler, who did not enjoy vast funding from oil and gas exports, Putin has an advantage of maintaining the status quo in that he can do whatever pleases him with his neighbors and no one is likely to scrutinize him. He has this leverage because from a global perspective, oil and gas play a crucial role in projecting power and if he decides to increase the price of these goods, then there is a possibility of an international as well as economic crisis. This is the “soft weapon” with which Hitler’s did not have to advance and execute his policies effectively.
CONCLUSION
The policies advanced by Hitler and Putin have similarities and differences. They both employed militia with strong dictatorial high-handedness through embracing espionage, diplomacy, threats, military power and intimidation. However, the differences underlie the fact that while Putin finds is easier in advancing his policies, Hitler had a difficult

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both Gandhi and Hitler were influential people. Although Gandhi was from India and Hitler was from Germany, they both had a sense of nationalism. Nationalism differed between Gandhi’s India and Hitler’s Germany. This is represented in a few different ways, Including Gandhi’s peace, Hitler’s violence, and their influence of future generations. They had long lasting effects for not only their nation, but the world.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cold War was the geopolitical, ideological, and financial battle between two world superpowers, the USA and the USSR that began in 1947 toward the end of the Second World War and endured until the collapse of the Soviet Union on December 26, 1991. The Soviets reacted to the Marshall Plan with the Zhdanov Doctrine, uncovered in October of 1947. The Zhdanov Doctrine guaranteed that the United States was looking for worldwide mastery through American dominion, and in addition the breakdown of vote based system. Then again, as indicated by this Doctrine, the Soviet Union was resolved to disposing of colonialism and the remaining hints of totalitarianism, while fortifying popular government. The Soviet Union and the United States, two countries that had never been foes on any field, and which had battled next to each other amid WWII, were presently undeclared adversaries in a war that could never tear out in the open, however which would keep going for over fifty years.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes: “[i]t is well known that Russia’s leaders are determined to prevent Ukraine from becoming a NATO member. But that does not mean that resisting NATO’s expansion was what motivated Putin” (Treisman 3). Although Treisman acknowledges that in a systematic analysis Putin would have acted in order to maintain the balance of power and keep Ukraine in check, he argues that Putin’s actions were truly dictated by his individual interpretation of Ukraine’s potential NATO status. Here Treisman draws on Bova’s operational code, referring to a leader’s “beliefs about the nature of politics. . . and his notions of correct strategy and tactics” (Bova 77) to explain Putin’s actions. .…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once in a while, there rise outstanding leaders who manage to change the economic status of their followers as well as the world history because of the policies they enact or decisions they make. One such person was the former President of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev who was born on 2nd March 1931 to peasant parents in the Stavropol territory in southwestern Russia (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica). In spite of his poor background, he steadily rose through the ranks of the then ruling party, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), and managed to implement sweeping reforms to the Union’s political systems. As a result, he stands as one of the leaders to have made a positive impact in the world. In particular,…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new Soviet leader, Leonid Brezhnev, did not reinstate the terror of the Stalin years; however, he sought to strengthen the role of the party bureaucracy and the KGB and encouraged the further clampdown on reform in the satellite states. In 1968, disaffection with this step backward led to the emergence of a reform movement in Czechoslovakia. The main goal of this “Prague Spring” was to bring about a more humanistic socialism within certain limits, such as keeping the nation within the Soviet Bloc. With this, he suppressed the revolution. The “Brezhnev Doctrine” that year proclaimed the Soviet right to intervene in the name of “proletarian internationalism” in any Communist country to protect “socialism” against “internal or external forces”…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    H. Gann. Housden, being an intentionalist, believed Hitler was a strong dictator. He quotes Hitler’s own personal qualities, as well as the efficiency of his regime - not only in terms of implementation of his ideas, but also in removing those opposed to him. Mommsen, on the other hand, was a functionalist. He held the general view that Hitler wasn’t actively involved within state politics, was vastly disorganised, and frequently reacted to outside pressures.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, Vladimir Putin, president of the world’s largest country, holds power. People blame Putin’s government for “the growth of ultra-nationalism in Russia” (Davydoff para 1). Many believe that Russia is moving towards a democratic government, while others believe Russia is moving farther away from a democracy and closer to a dictatorship.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Putin The Terrible Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Putin the Terrible Power is one of the main goal for all of mankind. Whether in a game, war, or life, a thirst for power has and forever will drive humans. Developing throughout the 17th century and after, foreign leaders have taken advantage of the world in an attempt to gain power, and influence. The film “Icarus” by Bryan Fogel, evidences how Vladimir Putin and Russia interfered with their athletes, allowing and encouraging athletes to use performance enhancing drugs. This comes in an attempt to win and further gain political power for the state.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini were like each other in many ways. Both were devoted Fascists, and both became dictators of their countries at similar times using similar strategies. This was not surprising, as Hitler had seen the success of Mussolini’s rise to power and was inspired to do the same in Germany. The two shared a common, clever strategy in taking power in a completely legal fashion. Their arrival in their governments and the laws they made that allowed them to run legal dictatorships were a major factor in their rise to power.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Putin And Gessen Analysis

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On September 19th Masha Gessen an esteemed Russian-American journalist gave a lecture on the many similarities between Presidents Donald trump and Vladimir Putin. Gessen started off by pointing out several obvious similarities between the two men since she has personally experienced the effects of both leaders. To demonstrate their similarities Gessen list the fact that these two powerful rulers both lie without remorse or fear of the consequences, take advantage of the media, and are incurious men who only have interest, not priorities. It is surprising to see how alike these two rulers are and is shocking that this controversy didn’t play a role in the election until it was too late. As Gessen pointed out these similarities she also went…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 2009, President Obama visited Moscow and made a huge impression on Russian people using his speech. During that visit, President Obama attempted to develop a new foreign policy approach and tried to change the rooted views that Russian people have held for the West. The speech given by President Obama was successful in some sense because many Russian people were impressed by President Obama’s new foreign policy. As they said, “This is a leader who thinks in new categories. Compared to him, we are people of the last generation.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Tsar Summary

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Steven Lee Myers wrote a book titled The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Putin which tells the life of Vladimir Putin. The book gives details about Putin’s experience in the KGB and his movement toward President of Russia. The book starts on the day of November 17 in 1941 with Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin (Putin’s father) on a suicide mission to stop the German army from completely destroying the last Soviet fleet left to defend their nation. The setting was about thirty miles from Leningrad and Putin was to capture a German soldier to interrogate and gather some information from. Putin and some comrades were approaching a building filled with German soldiers and their orders were to infiltrate the building.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas Bismarck promoted a more peaceful doctrine for German unification, Hitler sought the destruction of entire races to meet his goals. In fact, while Bismarck continued on a unification process centuries in the making, the ideology of Hitler was new to the German people. “But so far as what actually happened is concerned-not what might have happened-the evidence seems to leave no doubt. . . [none] comparable with that of Adolf Hitler. . .”(Bullock 1).…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of these methods are standard ways any government takes and keeps power over a people. So what makes Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union different from other governments, if being totalitarian is not considered? The difference is their extreme relationships with nationalism. Nazi Germany embraced nationalism to an extreme extent, and the Soviets rejected nationalism in everyway. The reason the Soviets and the Nazis are compared are that from an American view, a supposedly ‘central’ view, they are not only at the edges of political theory, they are on the extremes of nationalist…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini were dictators in Europe after World War I until the end of World War II. Hitler and Mussolini have similar aspects and ideals, yet they both have their own key differences. Each dictator affected their respective countries through their leadership and heavy influence. Hitler’s and Mussolini’s rise to power can be compared and analyzed by showing their influences of power that affected their economical, political, social changes on society. Hitler and Mussolini came into power to establish single party states while Germany and Italy were under severe tension and depression.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays