Karl Marx's View Of Capitalism

Great Essays
In the early 19th century, the Industrial Revolution began in England to improve the living standards of people, which quickly spread to western Europe, North America, Russia and Japan. New machines, such as the steam engine and the cotton gin, and factories transformed the agricultural societies into industrial societies. With the development of new technologies, economic production increased as high-quality goods and services were produced quickly, cheaply and more efficiently. In addition to economic change, a great change in society changed as well. The new work environments, factories, moved work outside homes, sending fathers, mothers and children in different directions, affecting traditional domestic life. Industrialization inspired …show more content…
Smith specifically believed that if all individuals pursued in their self-interests, it would surely create an economic system that will benefit all. In addition, that anything can be achieved, depending on how much labor is put in, as the amount of labor is the cost of any product or service. Carnegie too believed in dedication and the power of the individual to create his own destiny through hard work in the enterprise market, especially with a sense of Darwinism, where only the fittest will survive, or in an economical sense, only those who can achieve fortune will receive greater fortune. However, his views on class inequality partially match with Marx’s views. Marx criticized capitalism during the Industrial Revolution because the social injustice that arose, continuing from the Middle Ages, where the bourgeoisie dominated the economy while the working class suffered tremendously. Believing that capitalism was a flawed system as it led to class conflicts, Marx believed in communism was the ideal system to benefit all individuals equally. By overthrowing the wealthy and seizing their private property, those who work hard in society will surely gain. Carnegie, however, was not a communist. Instead he believed in the idea of “administration of wealth,” that the wealthy individuals had a responsibility to distribute their wealth throughout their lifetime to the community such as donations and charities. Smith supported capitalism, Marx was against capitalism, whereas Carnegie took sides from both perspectives. In a sense, all three were great intellectuals whose ideas are implemented in our society today. Our modern day countries of the United States and England stuck with the system of capitalism because how well it worked out, as where countries like China took over communist ideas and became a communist country.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both in a sense describe how government should be run and the drastic impact it has on its people. Smith describes in his first paragraph that every person is out to make money or be as wealthy as possible, so people look for a job or ,if they start their own job, employers that will make him or her the wealthiest. However people are selfish and are only out to better themselves, the only reason society benefits from this is that employment betters the economy (Smith 660). “Smith also argued that capital for the production and distribution of wealth could work most effectively in the absence of government interference” (Welch). To elaborate, Smith truly believes that achieving wealth is main goal of all humans on earth.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the debate between Mises and Marx continued, other philosophers would also debate if capitalism and socialism was better, and how each system would affect the entire society. Marx was against capitalism because of the gap between the two social classes that the capitalist system formed. Marx saw this struggle first hand during the Industrial Revolution and decided to write in his “Communist Manifesto”. He saw how the working poor became more of a commodity as the bourgeoisie obtained more and more power. Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The cause of Industrial Revolution are the new technology, new machines, and inventions. Machines took over the work of humans and animals, which made products much faster than handcrafting them. Spinning Jenny and the power loom increased the making of cloth. New farming improvements made it faster to grow crops and made a larger amount for the economy. These inventions all increased the population of the society and produced more products which led to Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cholera

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Marx’s books and Marx himself were truly important to the industrial revolution. Being the “father of communism”, Marx believed that everyone within society was equal, and the social gap between the rich and poor should be non existent. He wanted the role of any given individual to be that of equality, and thought capitalism was a system set up to benefit the rich and hinder the poor. Furthermore, Marx and his book “Das Kapital” provided an alternative viewpoint within the industrial revolution that was both unpopular and refreshing simultaneously. Marx and his work has a great impact on the Industrial Revolution because he provided an alternative viewpoint.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, due to complete communism, Marxism believes “Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another” (388). Although this perceptions’ intent is to improve human life with equality, it ultimately complicates the economy and life in his era. The demolishment of political power raises countless unresolved issues in society. Nowhere in Condorcet’s program does he remotely intend to create complications, but only to maximize human potential. Another major difference between these two men that define which theory is more likely to be successful is Condorcet’s realization that we cannot completely do away with inequality.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism was known as a conflict theory because of the society struggles between the rich and the poor. He believed there to be a way to construct an equal society, and getting the best out of everyone. The opposite of of the system Marx was aiming for was capitalism. Capitalism is the society we live in today, where corporations are owned by the owners. Therefore, capitalism treats people unequally.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Private property according to Marx was the right to enjoy one's own possessions without the regard of others in a society; private property was also a man's self-interest (Marx, Karl (1994-03-15). Marx: Selected Writings (Hackett Classics) The Jewish Question, pg 16). Marx wanted to abolish private property because this meant different class systems and alienation of the working class people. Private property exploited the citizens because wealthy people can afford to buy land forcing the working class to work all day for the lowest possible income just enough to survive. Marx wrote that private property is greed, a division of labor, and land ownership in a capitalist society that created competition among men and alienates working class people because the laborer works hard to dehumanize him as the landowner gains everything and the laborer gains nothing (Marx, Karl (1994-03-15).…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like liberal democracy, Marx believed that individual rights were harmful to the proletariat because they favored the landowning bourgeoisie over the proletariat. When individuals can’t be separated from society and class structure, it gives those with a higher place in the structure more opportunities to improve their rights and the right to fight for their liberties. Equal rights, to Marx and Marxists were never equal, because people, in capitalism weren’t treated equally or given equal protection.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    My general analysis of the bourgeoisie is about the capitalists’ selfishness and their destruction of social welfare. The bourgeois exempts himself from the disaster of suffering people, so the bourgeois does not have to take responsibility of it. Most of the old national industries have been destroyed and are still being destroyed. Today, this class still protects itself due to the continuation of capitalism; it is unfinished, and will never be finished. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It pits the wealthy against the lower class of society. This conflict is not the product of greed, or the lack of compassion for the poor, but it is the product of capitalism in Marx 's view. Marx contends that a capitalist society can only lead to social inequality by reason of, it is designed to promote individualism . The proletariat sells their labor to the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist, for money, but the capitalist owns the machines, the building, the product, and everything else associated with making the product. The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays