A Rhetorical Analysis Of The 9/11 Attack On The Twin Towers

The incident that occurred on September 11, 2001 has proposed many theories and ideas to what exactly happened. The video we watched introduced many different theories of the people who studied the event in depth and of some people who actually endured and experienced the event first hand. The ethos in the video are the theories and credibility given to them produced by the Italian directors or the people who studied the attack and what they think actually caused certain things that occurred during the attack. The logos in the video are the facts or reasoning in reference to what actually happened and what can be proven instead of assumed or thought to have happened. The pathos given in the video are those feelings and emotions the directors and producers want or strive you to feel during or after watching the video and while seeing their theories as to why it happened it happened or why it did not happen. …show more content…
The video was produced by Italian directors Franco Farcassi and Francesco Trento. The issue of this video is the investigation of the attack on the twin towers in New York City on September 11, 2001. They seem to not completely buy what they were told happened during the attack so they decided to investigate and propose several different situations that may have happened. The video includes several theories and arguments as to how and why the attack took place. It also talks about who may have done it. The video basically tells us that everything that we believed about this attack is a tremendous lie. The video makes you question what is actually true and what is now. The audience they seem to be trying to reach in this video are Americans or anyone who may be invested or have wondered about the events of the attack on the twin towers. Ultimately, the directors of the video are indicating that the attack on the twin towers was fake or a complete