France In The 19th Century

Great Essays
France in the nineteenth century hit on some of the darker parts of modernity on its journey to the France of today. There were many events and attitudes that a good portion of French men and women would like to forget. Many governmental officials, historians, and citizens of that time period repressed or consciously used policies and writings to perpetuate a myth that allowed for these same events and attitudes to fall by the wayside. In recent years, revisionist historians, or historians who look at the memories of past events and try to reconcile them with actual evidence, have debunked the myths of nineteenth-century France and allowed for the French to see themselves, a product of the misremembered horrors and craziness of the nineteenth …show more content…
This collective covering up of the bad helped by myth makers of all kinds hid France’s true nature from its inhabitants. The first thing that French people wanted to forget was that they lost the Second World War and were occupied by Nazi Germany. Marc Bloch, a historian who worked on the front during the retreat as an oil distributor and who eventually became a prominent member for the Resistance movement wrote in his book about the retreat, Strange Defeat, the reason for the defeat of France. He writes, “Whatever deep seated causes of the disaster may have been, the immediate occasion…was the utter incompetence of the High Command.” France did not want to face its incompetence, especially not the incompetence of its elite officer corps. The second event France made an effort to forget was the Vichy government’s collaboration during the occupation with the Germans. Everyone in the world knew that the Nazi party was full of raging anti-Semites, what many didn’t know was that there were many anti-Semitics in the French camp as well. France made a considerable effort after the war was over to make sure they seemed like the victimized party. Many “traditional representations [of France during the occupation] had literally obliterated the existence of a French antisemitism that was encouraged by official policies, with …show more content…
For French men and women, especially those who read history books, modernity means looking critically at their entire past and recognizing where myth, counter-myth, and the elusive truth collide and forming their own view of the history of their country and not just trusting what they read in elementary school. Learning about the dark side of modernity can be a painful road, one until now not many had traveled down, but for France to come to terms with its past is one of the only ways it can be better prepared for its

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    French Empire Dbq

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In my opinion, the more important area to control was inside the French Empire. He already controlled most of Europe, and if he didn't focus on what he already had, the people in the French Empire would angry that he was neglecting the people who stuck by his side. Also, if he had controlled more of Europe, he wouldn't be able to control his other countries. By 1812, the only parts of Europe not under his control were Britain, Portugal, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire. Besides the French Empire he controlled many small, independent countries including Spain, the Grand Duchy of Warsaw, and multiple German Kingdoms in Middle Europe.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    European history has obviously a lot of history that build up to modern day Europe. Many turning points in their history has a lot of significances to them, especially during 1789-1791 where the French Revolution occurred. Many events that happened during the French Revolution showed political and social effects. The political effects was the event of the Tennis Court Oath and the . The social effects that happened was the publication of The Declaration of the Rights of Women and the event of the Tennis Court Oath.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1870 and 1914, France underwent many changes in their government and in their economy. Economically, France was struggling after the Franco-German War of 1870 where they were forced to pay five billion francs. This jeopardized their economy all the way up to the 1880s, when France began to colonize in hope on economic growth. In 1890, France began to industrialize after many years of struggle. They invested in the Trans Siberian Railroad to strengthen their railroad control, of which was already successful.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    French and British Influence in American Events As young America struggled to find it’s identity as a true sovereign nation, the historically belligerent countries of France and Britain ruled great upon that particular internal struggle. Their inputs on the matter were held in high regards by the United States government and society despite being at times volatile and violent. Yet it was long before setting foot on the American continent that the climate of expansion had triggered a race for dominance and political vengeance between the two, and emanated throughout America's characteristic events, people, and future. It was between the years 1337 to 1453, the kingdoms of France and England, for many generations, fought to claim land in writings…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    France’s history is one of the most complicated and richest history in the world, but its beauty always mesmerizes the history lover. In the 8th century, after the death of Charlemagne came the division of the empire as the valid Treaty of Verdun was made . The three parts are now approximately France, Germany, and Italy. From 885 to 886, Charles the Fat took over Paris, however, he was incapable to show up at the battle with the Viking, proving that he was unable to protect the people, later he was overthrew because of the falling authority.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Helen Maria Williams, Charlotte Smith and the French Revolution Women of the 18th century were writing novels, lyric poetry and conduct books, but after the fall of the Bastille in 1789, political concerns appeared in their writing. They entered male dominating territory as historical writing was traditionally a male preserve (Walker, 2011, p. 145). In the 1790s a ‘Women’s War’ developed as women writers explored new genres in which they expressed their opinions on events in France, which their male contemporaries already were doing (ibid.). Helen Maria Williams and Charlotte Smith were two of the most important women writers of the period. They saw the French Revolution through women’s eyes and put their understanding of it in writing.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    History is full of abusive leaders, but the people they ruled were often accountable, to a certain extent, for allowing them to stay in power. This was especially true in post-Revolution France, where the citizens were willing to trade away certain freedoms for safety under the leadership of Napoleon Bonaparte. Similarly, many freedoms previously held by modern Americans are being restricted due to the threat of terrorism. This comparison bodes ill, especially when the danger of indifference to liberty is considered.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French Revolution had affected the whole of Europe in many ways. They had probably made other peasants in the other countries feel like they could also overthrow their government if they had a multitude of others to help them in their works. The revolution made others feel empowered, and think that if they joined forces they could wipe out monarchy as a whole. The revolution could’ve made the governments also fear for their own safety and protection.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this desire for sovereignty exposed the deep-rooted anti-Semitic views of many of the French people. Moreover, the passive compliance of non-Jews due to their lack of understanding allowed for greater persecution of the Jews. Non-Jews did not understand. It is the combination of these reasons that resulted in the betrayal of the Jews by their country for the Germans alone could not have committed the atrocities in France to the scale that they occurred. It was France's fault that so many Jews died and the backlash of these actions would be felt for years to…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 19th century, France had a wide variety of government types - four dictatorships, two constitutional monarchies, two empires, and three republics. The French government was very unreliable and ever-changing. Directly after the French Revolution, a two house legislative body formed. This expanded power to the bourgeois. However, later power was returned solely to kings.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    American Revolution occurred because the American colonists resented being taxed without representation in Parliament. They wanted the same rights as other British subjects. The French Revolution, on the other hand, occurred because the French subjects wanted sovereignty ‘supreme power or authority’. from the French monarchy due to the enlightenment ideals that were popular at the time.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Three observations that Arthur Young made about the life in France between the years 1787 and 1789 were that the poor people seem very poor as even the children are terribly ragged, the lack of bread is terrible as the price of it is above the peasant’s ability to pay, and that a woman joined him and complained about the hard times as the high taxes are crushing the peasants. 2. a. The conclusion that I can draw about the relationship between the percentage of the population in each estate and the percentage of land owned by each estate is that the larger the percentage of the population in each estate, the larger the percentage of land owned by that estate.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion the French were the most ethical group in colonizing the New World because they did not come to conquer or enslave native populations. They came to work collectively with the native inhabitants to create a lucrative trade network comprised of military forts, trading posts and agricultural villages. The French were respectful of the native inhabitants and that respect was reciprocated. They also developed a respect for the land and its inhabitants, which resonated with the natives.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    French Empires

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The British and French Empires spent the majority of the period between 1793 and 1815 at war with one another; imperial conflict in this period was not uncommon – the two powers had previously clashed during the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) and the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783, with direct French involvement from 1778). [CITE THESE DATES????????] Though by 1815 the Napoleonic Empire had fallen and been replaced by the restored Bourbon Monarchy, which adopted the British ideological system of constitutional monarchy, ideology was not the root of their conflict. However, the two Empires during this period (and continuing into the later nineteenth century IF I TALK ABOUT THAT) operated with varying ideologies (MAYBE? SOME SIMILARITIES)…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through this subject, Hunt underlines how the overwhelming and vehement pornographic pamphlets about Antoinette were ways in which gender stereotypes were revealed and pushed during this time period. Indeed, Hunt explores the nature of these pamphlets by using a different method of interpreting history: through analyzing the French Revolution in terms of cultural history— “high and popular culture—and gender history— “power relations”—and how they provide a different analysis of the French Revolution. Through these pamphlets, Hunt illustrates the perspective from which the representation of Antoinette and thus women in general is offered: Frenchmen supported the need for a “separation of women from the public sphere”; in this, the pamphlets serve as a physical reminder of how women and politics shouldn’t mix (Hunt, 213). Likewise, this notion evokes a sense of fear among Frenchmen of what would happen if women and politics do mix: the pamphlets served “as political propaganda” in order to further represent “the ‘problem of the feminine’” in regard to politics (Lecture 10/19). This perspective, moreover, ties to Hunt’s bigger argument: the perspective from which the pamphlets were created elucidates on this “pro-male culture among the revolutionaries, in a sense making the situation of women the same or worse than before the Revolution” (Lecture 10/19).…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays