• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/115

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

115 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Social Cognition
The way people interpret, analyze, and remember things about the social wrld
2 Ways to process information
1. Serially - one at a time
2. Parallel - multiple
Dual Process Model of Social Cognition
Perceive --> Automatic Reaction then you can either go to your final reaction or go to a conscious reaction 1st and then to Final
Explicit Cognition
You deliberatly think that way. It is a conscious assesment
Implicit Cognition
You think something automatically (you arent aware you are doing it)
Motivated-Tactician Model
You are not going to consciously think about something unless you have a personal motivation to do so. They are based on your personal goals, beliefs, and motivations and needs
Thought Supression
Prevent certain thoughts from entering your mind
Category
mental grouping of objects based on a common theme
Social categorization
forming categories of people based on certain common traits
Prototype
The person in a category that most represents it
Schema
using own experiences with casual relationships to explain the theory of the social world
Script
schema to describe a well known situation to use as a guide for behavior and problem solving
Priming
A recent exposure to an event increases your ability to remember other instances of that
Heuristics
shortcuts to reduce complex judgements to just simple rules of thumb
Representative Heuristic
Judging a category based on the most representative of the category (most typical one)
Avaliability Heuristic
judge the freq of an event in terms of the # of examples present
Primary/Anchoring/Adjustment Heuristic
Using the first impression as the most important one
Confirmation Bias
You find only information that supports your beliefs and ignore everything that refutes it
Hindsight Bias
tendency that once an event occurs you overestimate the ability to have forseen that event

Study: when things affect us negitively they do not have hindsight bias. Factory workers getting laid off
Counterfactual Thinking
Evaluate an event based on an imagined alternative
Controlled Unbelieving
automatically belive what you see, but have to consciously process it to be able to reject it
False Conscious Effect
overestimate how common something is based on your own positive opinions
False Uniqeness Effect
underestimate how common something is because of your negative thoughts towards it
Self Fulfilling Prophecy
someones expectations about a person leads to their fulfillment of those expectations
Just-World belief
system where the world is perceived to be fair
Learned Helplessness
passive resignation due to repeated exposure to negative events that are percieved as unavoidable
Belief
an estimation of the probability that something is true
Attitude
positive or negative evaluation of an object
Implicit Attitude
Automatic attitude or when someone isnt even aware they posess the attitude
Explicit Attitude
consciously held attitude
Dual Attitudes
having both an explicit and implicit attitude at the same time that conflict.
Values
enduring beliefs about important life goals based on a previous situation
Mere Exposure Effect
tend to warm up to things the more we are around them
Classical Conditioning
learn by association (neutral stimulus)
Subliminal Conditioning
classical consitioning that occurs in absence of the stimuli involved
Operant Conditioning
behavior is strengthened when reinforced and weakened with punishment
Self Perception Theory
infer our internal states and attitudes based on observing our behavior
Functional Approach
people change their attitudes based on different psychological needs. to change an attitude you must know why you had it in the first place.
Utilitarian Attitude
helps to acheive rewards and gain approval from others (behaviorist)
Knowledge Attitude
helps a person structure the world so that it makes sense (cognitive)
Ego Defence Attitude
protect yourself from acknowledging basic self truths (psychoanalytic)
Value-Expression Attitude
express important aspects of self concept (Humanistic)
(4) Factors in determining Attitude-Behavioral relationships
1. Level of attitude-behavioral specificity
2. Time Factors
3. Private v. Public Self Awareness
4. attitude strength
attitude accessibility
Theory of Planned Behavior
peoples concious decisions about things are related to their attitudes towardss the behavior in general, norms of society, and your perceived behavioral control
Behavior Intentions are Shaped By: (3)
1. Attitudes
2. Subject Norms
3. Percieved Behavioral Control
Cognitive Consistancy
tendency to seek consistency in your thoughts
Cognitive Dissonance
feeling uncomfortable when you do something against your norms
Self-Affirmation Theory
coping with being bad at something by remembering all the things you are good at even if they are unrelated
Reference Group
a group that sets the standards that you judge yourself by
Persuasion
change someone's attitudes through a certain message
Elaboration liklihood model
persuasive messages can change an attitude by:
1. differing in the amount of cognitive effort
2. differing the elaboration it requires
Central Route Processing
high elaboration of message content by focusing on the central topic of the message
Peripheral Route Processing
low elaboration of message content because do not focus on the central topic of the message
Sleeper Effect
delayed effectivness of a message from a noncredible source
Protection-Motivation Theory
fear induces self protective response and motivate to whether the threat can be avoided
Need For Cognition
individual preference to engage in effortful cognitive activities
Subliminal Perception
processing of information that is just below the ability to be consciously aware
Prejudice
attutude towards members of a specific group that imply they are inferior in social status
Discrimination
negative action towards members in a specific group
Explicit Prejudice
on purpose
Implicit Prejudice
unconsciously
Stigma
a personal attribute that causes a person to be inferior in the eyes of others
Heterosexism
applaudes heterosexuality and stigmatizes nonheterosexuals
Courtesy Stigma
when associate with stigmatized people you risk facing negative evaluations from others
2 social factors that determine a groups form of prejudice
1. Target group has a comptetitive relationship with the mainstream or the Target has a cooperative relationship with the main stream
2. target is of low or high social status with the mainstream society
Contemptuous Prejudice
low social status target group has a competitive relationship with the mainstream
Envious Prejudice
high social status group has a competitive relationship with the mainstream
Paternalistic Prejudice
low status group has a cooperative relationship with mainstream society
3 Different types of stigma
1. Tribal Identities
2. Blemishes of individual character
3. abominations of the body
Outgroup Homogenity Effect
Perception that you are more similar to your outgroup than your ingroup
Stereotypes
beliefs of people based on the category they are in rather than on an individual basis
Illusory Correlation
belief that 2 variables are associated when in fact there is little or no association at all
Sterotype threat
disturbing awareness of a sterotyped group that their actions and characteristics fit the stereotype and then they will confirm it as a self classification
2 Functions of sterotyped thinking
1. Fast and Efficient
2. Often Wrong
Ingroup bias
more favorable to people in your ingroup than in your outgroup
Social Identity theory
people try to enhance their self esteem by identifying with social groups that they percieve as being better than other social groups
Realistic Group Conflict Theory
intergroup conflict happens because of limited resources
Ethnocentrism
increased loyalty to ones group while increasing hostility to outgroups
Superordinate Goal
mutually shared goal that can be acheived only with intergroup cooperation
Social Dominiance Theory
social groups are in a hierarchy of power. Dominant group holds the majority of the resources
Authoritarian Personality
person that is submissive to authority, adhears to conventional values, and holds prejudice towards outgroups
Old Fashioned Racism
Blatent negative stereotypes, racial inequality, and superiority in ones own race
Aversive Racism
egalitarian social values and negative emotions towards a group that make it so they avoid interacting with them in general
Sexism
subordinating a person based on their gender
Ambivalent Sexism
directed against women based on both positive and negative attitudes rather than uniform dislike
Sexual harassment
unwelcome physical or verbal sexual actions
Contact Hypothesis
under certain circumstances direct contact between different groups can decrease prejudice
Intergroup anxiety
anxiety when interacting with an outrgroup member
4 conditions to reduce prejudice with the Contact hypothesis
1. equal status interaction
2. intergroup cooperation
3. sustained close contact
4. social norms favoring equality
Jigsaw Classroom
cooperative group learning technique that is designed to reduce prejudice and raise self esteem
Anchoring Effect
remember years that have specific events in them
Early Impressions
can sometimes not be overriden by later impressions
False Consensus Effect in judging others
if you do or would do something you are more likely to believe that others will too rather than if you wouldnt or didnt do something
Salience Bias effects in judgment
if you are more afraid of something you will think of it more often even if it is a very rare event. (ex: kidnapping and snakebites)
Human Advantage
humans cognitively and automatically process
automatic = quick and easy
cognitive = slower but more info can be processed
4 Components of Automatic Reactions
1. efficient
2. Unintentional
3. Uncontrollable
4. w/o awareness
Recency Principle
what you have been thinking about lately will enhance your perception of something
Chronic Principle
the way we view ourselves translates to the way we view others. athletes view people based on their athletic ability
Hostile Attribution Bias
when people are laughing in a room you automatically think they are laughing about you
Controlled unbelieving
automatically believe what you see until you process it to be able to reject the experience
Counterfactual thinking
evaluate an event based on an imagined alternative
sweet taste of bronze sour taste of silver
ABC's Of Attitude
Affect - emotional reactions and feelings toward the attitude object
Behavior - past behavior towards an object influences future behavior
Cognition - thoughts and beliefs about the attitude object
univalent attitude
all positive attitude or all negative, no inbetween
intra-attitudinal ambivalence
affect contadicts behavior contradicts cognition
ex: flash of positive when you see a snickers but imagine wife saying its bad for you
Ambivalence Amplification
one intra-attitudinal ambivalence winning out over another. ex: Australian james bond, love him when he shows up to things hate him when he flakes
Functions of Attitudes
Knowedge - for breakfast you already know what you like you dont have to try every cereal every morning
Identity Function - need to identify with a certain group
(3) Sources of Attitudes
1. Mere Exposure
2. Classical Conditioning
3. Self Perception Theory
Why are attitudes important?
They predict behavior
attitude --> behavior consistancy
Deliberative Model
Reasoned Attitude --> Behavioral Intention --> Behavior
*Reasoned Attitude = Belief X Evaluation
Where does the deliberative model work?
Political Attitudes: voting behavior
Workplace Attitudes: Looking for a new job
College Attitudes: college decisions
Assumptions of the deliberative model
1. Humans are rational beings
2. people consider the implications of their actions before they act
Spontaneous Attitude Accessibility Model
attiude activation --> selective perception --> attitude-biased action

we look at the world through attitude glasses and see things in terms of them
Generalized Dual Process Model with Attitudes
perception of attitude object --> automatic attitude activation -> can either go to theory of planned behavior or just straight to behavior
Persuasion
An attempt to change an evaluaive orientation; could happen by changing the evaluative extremity or just the valence entirely
Central Route to change attitudes
"Hard way" - thoughtful analysis of arguments, leads to a special focus on argument quality