Praxis Core Content Knowledge

Front 1

Based on the segregation of students according to race, it was tried at the sureme court who ordered that education must be on equal term for all children

Back 1

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

Front 2

Determined the tracking system for regular and special education students based on intelligence scores was discriminatorily unconstitutional for some populations of stedents and could not be used.

Back 2

Hobson v. Hansen 1967

Front 3

Determined that finacial problems cannot be a reason for the lack of appropriate programs to children with disabilities.

Back 3

Mills v. Board of Education 1972

Front 4

Ordered schools to provide extend school years services for students with disabilities who may regress over long periods with our attending formal school programs.

Back 4

Armstrong v. Kline 1979

Front 5

Established the right for all children with mental retardation to free public education .

Back 5

Pennsylvania association for Retarded Citizens v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Front 6

Ruled that IQ test could not be used as the primary or sole basis of placing students in special programs.

Back 6

Larry P v. Riles 1979

Front 7

Upheld that each child with a disability has the right to an individualized program and supportive services deemed appropiate and neccessary.

Back 7

Board of Ed of the Hudson School District v. Rowley 1982

Front 8

Ruled homebound instruction for a student with multiple health problems di not comply with the LRE and required the student beplaced in a class with non-disabled children and recieve the necsessy related medical services.

Back 8

Department of Ed v. Katherine D. 1984

Front 9

Forced the school to provide non- physician required medical sercies to allow a physically impared

Back 9

Irving Independent School Dist. v. Tatro

Front 10

Ruled tha tstufents eith dissabilities many not be excluded for nisbehavior that is disabilty related, but services could cease if the behavior was not related to the disability.

Back 10

Honig v. Doe 1988

Front 11

Upheld that all children with disabilities must be provided FAPE with outh exception.

Back 11

Timothy v. Rochester School Dist. 1989

Front 12

Determined that a student in a parchial school should be provided the assistance of a related service pertaining to the disabilty and that these findings did not violate the constitution of th e seperation of church and state.

Back 12

Zobrest v Catalina School Dist 1993

Front 13

Ruled to support a family preference to educate a child with mental retardation in the general educaiton classroom

Back 13

Oberti v. Board of Education 1993

Front 14

Affirmed that puplic schools are not obligated to provide special education serces if parent choose to place their child in a private school.

Back 14

Foley v Special School Dist of St. Louis County 1998

Front 15

Ruled that medical services necessary to a student with a disability to acess and benifit from special education must beprovided by th eschool as long as the service does not require a physician.

Back 15

Cedar Papidss v. Garret F 1999