• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Definition of a state

An entity that is able to claim monopoly on the legitimate use, threat or authorisation of violence in a territory

Key figures in realism

Thucydidies- self interest and power, wrote on the peloponesuan war


Machiavelli- better to be feared than loved, prince must look like a lion and act like a fox


Thomas Hobbes- all men are restless and desire power

Realism

- The dominant theory of international relations


- Analogous to a state of war where states are concerned for their own security and survival

Tenets

- International system of states is anarchical


- State centric theory


- Primary aim of states is to survive, need power to do this


- Each state is responsible to ensure own wellbeing


- ‘Balance of power’, states under threat by a hegemonic power will form an alliance

Forms of realism

- Classical realism: ancient greece to 20th century


- Structural realism (neorealism): post 1979


- Neoclassical realism: 1998

Three ‘S’s of realism

Statism


Survival


Self help

Statism

- States compete for power and security


- Nature of competition is 0 sum


- Power is a relational concept

Survival

- Nations survival is first and ultimate responsibility


- States strive for survival

Self help

- Stares must rely on selves to be secure


- Security dilema: self help attempts of states for security tend to lead to rising insecurity for other states as each sees the other as threatening


- One states quest for security generates insecurity in other states

Criticisms

- Doesn’t address US defeat in Vietnam or USSR defeat in Afghanistan


- Doesn’t explain end of cold war


- Power concerns just states


- How does it address regional integration and humanitarian intervention


- How does realism explain other forms of power