Navy Manpower Policies 1000.16K Ch-1 Section 7, 8

Front 1

DCNO (MPTE) (CNO (N1)



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 1

has the overall responsibility to plan, program, manage and execute military manpower authorizations.

Front 2

Military Authorizations



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 2

Military manpower requirements are resourced through the application of programmed end strength
in TFMMS.

Front 3

Non-military Authorizations.



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 3

overnment civilian and contractor requirements become authorized when the cognizant
budget submitting authority obligates available funds against the positions.

Front 4

Authorization Level of Detail



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 4

Manpower authorizations will have at least the same level of detail as the requirement.

Front 5

Authorization to Requirement Alignment



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 5

The authorization will equal the requirement in quality (rating, designator, paygrade, etc.) unless constrained by resources, CNO (N1) policy, or legal limitations (e.g., title 10 constraints on E8, E9, LCDR, CDR, CAPT and flag billets).

Front 6

Planning Horizon.



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 6

Navy manpower authorizations are aligned
to the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP) time horizon. funded positions are programmed to support personnel management in the execution year, budget year, and the 6 program years beyond (total of 8 years)

Front 7

Military manpower authorizations



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 7

generate demand signals to access, train, distribute and retain military personnel either directly or indirectly. Maintaining an accurate, reliable, and executable manpower base is paramount to the success of these fundamental functions of the MPTE enabler.

Front 8

Whose responsibility is it to accurately maintain their authorizations in TFMMS/TFARS, including manpower balancing (quan/qual) and timely submission of change requests?
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 8

Manpower BSOs, Enterprises and Enablers

Front 9

Whose responsibility is it to enforce manpower management rules designed to maintain an executable billet base, in compliance with fiscal controls and legal constraints?
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 9

CNO

Front 10

Whose responsibility is it assess the personnel executability of the aggregate billet base and provide recommended courses of action to correct when billet profiles are deemed unelectable?
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 10

community managers

Front 11

How is military manpower programmed and budgeted in the PPBES process?


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 11

using programmed end strength. Programmed end strength represents the resource sponsor's funding decision with regards to military manpower but provides significantly less detail than manpower requirements and authorizations.

Front 12

Two forms of manpower imbalance



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 12

Excess Billets Authorized (BA
Unqualitized End Strength

Front 13

Unqualitized End Strength



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 13

when an LOA contains more end strength than authorizations. causes an incomplete demand signal to the MPTE systems potentially resulting in inventory shortfalls and gapped billets.

Front 14

Excess Billets Authorized (BA)



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 14

Level of Aggregation (LOA) contains more authorizations than programmed end strength. sends an invalid demand signal to the MPTE systems resulting in inefficiencies. normally occurs when the resource sponsor has removed funding.

Front 15

Levels of Aggregation



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 15

Manpower balancing is done at the six levels of aggregation (LOA) used in programming. For a LOA to be in balance, the number of authorizations and the amount of programmed end strength in the LOA must be equal. LOA consists of six elements.

Front 16

levels of aggregation:
Unit Identification Code (UIC) (Location in TFARS


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 16

UIC is a five digit alpha/numeric that is issued from DFAS and identifies the activity. In TFARS the field will be known as Location.

Front 17

levels of aggregation:
Activity Group/Sub-Activity Group (AG/SAG)


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 17

Defines different types of functions of an activity, and the similar types of tasks within those functions, for budget justification and accounting purposes.

Front 18

levels of aggregation:
Program Element (PE)


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 18

the primary data element used in programming. It defines and allocates resources (personnel, equipment and facilities) to a specific Navy warfare and/or supportive program.

Front 19

levels of aggregation:
Resource Sponsor (RS)


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 19

Identifies the resource sponsor having functional cognizance over the program and associated funding.

Front 20

levels of aggregation:
Manpower Type (MT)


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 20

Defines Total Force manpower category (e.g., officer, enlisted, civil service and contractors, etc.) used to authorize the manpower requirement.

Front 21

levels of aggregation:
Manpower Resource Code (MRC)


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 21

Identifies the type of appropriation and/or category used to resource manpower (e.g., active duty, active duty student, FTS, drilling reservist, reserve recruiter, personnel exchange program etc.).

Front 22

Programmed end strength



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 22

the resource used to fund military manpower authorizations. It is provided at the LOA and embodies MPN or RPN dollars allocated to fulfilling the activity's warfighting capabilities or MFT. No end strength is required to generate a manpower requirement.

Front 23

Who has the responsibility to plan and make programming recommendations for civilian manpower authorizations?

NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 23

DCNO (MPTE) (CNO (Nl)

Front 24

What is Out-of-Cycle Programming



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 24

The reallocation of programmed end strength outside of the PPBES process, also referred to as reprogramming.

Front 25

End Strength Compensation Source



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 25

All Navy controlled end strength is allocated to the Enterprises and Enablers in the PPBES process. Therefore, all compensation for end strength Out-of-Cycle programming must come from the Enterprises and Enablers.

Front 26

Compensation for emergent end strength requests that originate from within an Enterprise/Enabler will come from within the Enterprise/Enabler.

NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 26

Compensation for tasking to an Enterprise/Enabler from the Fleet Readiness Enterprise (Warfighting Enterprises only), Echelon 1 or higher authority shall come from within the tasked Enterprise (or enabler) unless CNO (NI) or higher authority specifically directs the compensation come from another source.

Front 27

Changes to the personnel inventory take much longer to effect than changes to authorizations so changes to military manpower authorizations should be limited and made as soon in advance as possible.
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 27

Changes in the occupational classification or defining characteristics of a manpower authorization are approved through Billet Change Requests (BCR)

Front 28

TFMMS Decision Matrix



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 28

is used to ensure all executability issues are addressed. It provides required chops and routing instructions for billet change requests.

Front 29

Changes in paygrade constitute a change in the resources required and will not normally be allowed without grade compensation outside of the POM/PR process.
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 29

The paygrade of authorizations involving designator or rating conversions shall normally remain the same unless a lower paygrade is required.

Front 30

Authorization Effective Dates



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 30

The effective begin and end dates of authorizations will be 01 OCT of the fiscal year

Front 31

Military-to-civilian conversions



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 31

The effective end date of the military authorization will be 01 APR of the fiscal year and the civilian start date will also be 01 APR if the conversion was programmed using the standard half year costing convention.

Front 32

Additional Duty (ADDU) manpower authorizations



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 32

are assigned to satisfy the need for expertise not available from within activities' assets, when valid workload does not support a full-time manpower requirement, or to accommodate limited staff function

Front 33

Establishment, change, or disestablishment of an ADDU manpower authorization requires an agreement prior to submission of TFMMS/TFARS change request.

NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 33

an agreement prior to submission of TFMMS/TFARS change request.

Front 34

End Strength Assignment



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 34

The required end strength for both ADDU to and ADDU from manpower authorizations is counted only against the primary (or supporting) activity. The ADDU from activity's authorized requirement does not require end strength compensation

Front 35

The following apply to all ADDU manpower authorizations:


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 35

ADDU manpower requirements must be authorized and linked to and from primary activity's authorized requirement.

Front 36

The following apply to all ADDU manpower authorizations:


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 36

The ADDU relationship of the commanding officer, officer in charge, or other similar types of manpower requirements for tenant or detachment activities providing support services to host activities is at the discretion of the 8S0.

Front 37

The following apply to all ADDU manpower authorizations:


NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 37

The ADDU from manpower authorization reflects all manpower requirement and authorization information of the primary activity's manpower authorization, including the Requirements Indicator (RI) codes.

Front 38

Personnel Exchange Program



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 38

provides for a one- for-one exchange between USN military personnel and personnel from other military services, including foreign services, per reference (ii).

Front 39

Who manages Navy Flag Officer matters?



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 39

CNO NOOF

Front 40

What provides strict limits on the number of US Navy Flag Officers. New Flag officer authorizations generally require one-for-one compensation resulting in the decrement of an existing Flag manpower authorization.
NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 40

Title 10

Front 41

What is The Officer Subspecialty System?



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 41

an integrated manpower and personnel classification and control system that establishes criteria and procedures for identifying officer requirements for advanced education, functional training, and significant experience in various fields and disciplines.

Front 42

The Subspecialty System is used to?



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 42

identify those requirements which require a Subspecialty Code (SSC) including a specific degree program (four digit code) and the specific level (suffix last digit) required to perform the task and mission of the validated position.

Front 43

Enlisted CNO Priority Manning



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 43

priority manning is dictated mission accomplishment and that which is essential to the national interest and these activities must be properly manned, even when shortages exist. Priority manning may be on a continuous basis or may exist only for a period of time.

Front 44

Who may authorize and direct priority 1 and 2 manning. MCAF and MCAB may authorize and direct Priority 3 manning for their activities only?

NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 44

the CNP

Front 45

Priority 1:



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 45

Ships and activities whose mission success is deemed vital to the highest national interest and which require some degree of priority manning for an INDEFINITE PERIOD of time

Front 46

Priority 2:



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 46

Ships and activities whose mission success is deemed essential to the national interest and which have specific need for increased manning for a SPECIFIED PERIOD of time in order to carry out their mission

Front 47

Priority 3:



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 47

Ships and activities which have a SPECIFIC NEED for increased manning above the normal manning level for specific mission accomplishment

Front 48

Unauthorized Priority Manning



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 48

No activity will be priority manned except as authorized by CNP for Priority 1 and 2 manning, or by the respective MCA for Priority 3 manning.

Front 49

Excess Manning



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 49

Manning a ship or activity in excess of manpower authorizations is not authorized unless Navy-wide excesses exist in the applicable distribution community
(rating/NEC) as determined by fair share methodology in the Navy Manning Plan

Front 50

Primary Manning Codes



NAVY MANPOWER POLICIES 1000.16K SECTION 7, 8

Back 50

used to record approved enlisted priority manning.The first digit identifies the category of billets assigned priority manning (all billets in an activity, a selected rating, or a closed loop/transitory NEC). The second digit indicates the level (percent) of priority manning for the approved category