• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/45

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

45 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Rule 4
Summons
Rule 4(c)
Service of Summons
Rule 4(d)
Waiving Service
Rule 4(e)
Serving an Individual Within a Judicial District of the US
Rule 4(k)
Territorial Limits of Effective Service
Rule 4(m)
Time Limit for Service - 120 days after filing the complaint
Rule 8
Pleading Rules
Rule 8(a)
Claim for Relief
Rule 8(b)
Defenses; Admissions and Denials
Rule 8(c)
Affirmative Defenses
Rule 9
Pleading Special Matters (e.g., Fraud)
Rule 9(b)
Pleading Fraud or Mistake - Must plead circumstances with "particularity"
Rule 11
Signing Pleadings and other Stuff - Lawyer has to sign everything and that verifies that it's all in good faith and such
Rule 12
Defenses and Objections; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Rule 12(a)
Time to serve a responsive pleading - generally 21 days after being served, but if service is waived under Rule 4(d) within 60 days after request for waiver was sent (90 days if D outside US)
Rule 12(b)
Motions you can file before responding to a complaint:
1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
2) lack of personal jurisdiction
3) improper venue
4) insufficient process
5) insufficient service of process
6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
7) failure to join a party under Rule 19
Rule 12(c)
Motion for judgment on the pleadings
Rule 12(f)
Motion to strike
Rule 12(g)
Joining motions - you can join any Rule 12 motions together, but in general you can't make a second Rule 12 motion when you've already made one, so join all the ones you want to make into the same motion. (Rule 12(h)(2) and (3) are exceptions)
Rule 12(h)
Waiving and preserving certain defenses - Rule 12(b)(2)-(5) defenses are waived by either omitting it from a motion as described in Rule 12(g) or by failing to make a Rule 12 motion at all or include it in a responsive pleading or in an amendment allowed by Rule 15(a)(1) as a matter of course.

Other defenses ((b)(1), (6), and (7)) can be raised in any pleading, by a motion under 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings, or at trial.
Rule 13
Counterclaims and Crossclaims
Rule 13(a)
Compulsory counterclaims - pleading must state any counterclaim that the pleader has against an opposing party if the claim:
(A) arises out of the transaction/occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim; and
(B) does not require adding another party over whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction.

Exceptions are if when the action was commenced, the claim was the subject of another pending action; or if opposing party is suing by attachment and pleader doesn't assert any counterclaim under this rule.
Rule 13(b)
Permissive counterclaims - if it ain't compulsory, you can plead it if you want. [Subject, of course, to whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claim--this does not purport to be a grant of jurisdiction]
Rule 13(g)
Crossclaims - A pleading can assert a crossclaim against a coparty if the claim arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim.
Rule 14
Third-party practice (Impleaders)
Rule 14(a)(1)
When a D may bring in a third party: Timing - D may serve summons and complaint on a nonparty who is or may be liable to it for all or part of the claim against it. This can be done as a matter of course within 14 days after serving its original answer; after that, it must obtain the court's leave by motion.
Rule 14(a)(2)
TPD's claims and defenses:
a TPD must assert any Rule 12 defense against TPP's claim;
must assert any counterclaim against TPP;
may assert any defenses against the P's claim;
and may assert against P any claim arising out of the transaction/occurrence that is the subject matter of the P's claim against the TPP.
Rule 14(a)(5)
TPD can do a Rule 14 chain move against a new TPD who may be liable to original TPD (now a TPP) for all or part of any claim against it... and so it continues, worlds without end
Rule 15
Amending Pleadings
Rules 15(a)
Amendments before trial:
(1) Amendments to pleadings can be done as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it, or if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.

(2) Other amendments - can be made with written consent of opposing party or by court's leave; court should freely give leave when justice so requires

(3) Time to Respond - Unless court orders otherwise, within the time left to respond to the original pleading or within 14 days of service of amended pleading, whichever is later.
Rule 15(b)
Amendments during and after trial - if you object to evidence not relevant to the pleadings, the court will allow the other party to amend the pleadings when doing so will aid in presenting the merits and it wouldn't prejudice your action/defense.

If you don't object, though, it will be treated as if the issue was included in the pleadings (the issue is "tried by consent") and the other party can freely amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence and raise an unpleaded issue. You lose.
Rule 15(c)
Relation back of amendments - happens when:
1) the law providing applicable statute of limitations allows it to relate back; or
2) the amendment asserts a claim or defense that arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out in the original pleading; or
3) the amendment changes the party against whom a claim is asserted, the previous criterion is met, and if, within the period provided by Rule 4(m) for serving the summons and complaint, the party to be brought in both
i) received such notice of the action that it will not be prejudiced in defending on the merits; and
ii) knew or should have known that the action would have been brought against it, but for a mistake concerning the proper party's identity.
Rule 18
Joinder of claims - A party asserting a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim may join as many claims as it has against an opposing party [again, as long as there is subject matter jurisdiction over each one]
Rule 19
Required Joinder of Parties
Rule 19(a)
Persons Required to be Joined if Feasible (necessary parties): You're necessary if you are subject to service of process and your joinder will not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction. Then you must be joined if:
A) in your absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among the existing parties; or
B) you claim an interest relating to the subject of the action and are so situated that disposing of the action in your absence may: i) as a practical matter impair or impede your ability to protect that interest; or ii) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring multiple or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.
Rule 19(b)
When Joinder of Required Party is not Feasible: Court has to weigh factors to determine if the action should proceed or be dismissed. These factors include:
1) extent to which a judgment rendered in the person's absence might prejudice that person or the existing parties;
2) extent to which any prejudice could be lessened or avoided by a) protective provisions in the judgment, b) shaping the relief, or c) other measures;
3) whether a judgment rendered in the person's absence would be adequate, and
4) whether the plaintiff would have an adequate remedy if the action were dismissed for nonjoinder.
Rule 20
Permissive Joinder of Parties - pretty liberal
Rule 23
Class Actions
Rule 23(a)
Class Action prerequisites:

1) Numerosity - too many members of the class, joinder impracticable

2) Commonality - there are questions of law or fact common to the class

3) Typicality - claims or defenses of representative parties are typical of those of the class; and

4) representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class
Rule 23(b)
Types of Class Actions:
1) Prosecuting actions separately would create a risk of inconsistent adjudications creating incompatible conduct for opposing party (protecting defendant), or of impairing/impeding other class members to protect their interest (limited fund?)

2) party opposing class has acted on grounds that apply generally to the whole class so that final injunctive/declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole

3) Any other kind of reason class action is best option. Weigh factors.
Rule 24
Intervention - Let a party jump into a lawsuit. A necessary party has to be allowed in, others may be allowed in if they have a relevant claim.
Rule 26
Disclosure/Discovery
Rule 35
Physical and Mental Examinations
Rule 36
Requests for Admission
Rule 37
Failure to make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions