Difference Between Civil Ligation And Criminal Litigation

Superior Essays
The two major differences between a civil ligation and a criminal litigation are the way the first approach is taken to begin the procedure of litigation and the processes leading up to and to the moment of a trial. They both generally follow the same guidelines but there are many key differences that will play out. In a criminal litigation, an arrest of a suspect is made where law-enforcement sees probable cause and then the complaint is filed by the prosecuting attorney if there is found to be sufficient evidence against the suspect. After the arrest is made, the defendant is brought before the judge, usually within 24-hours of the arrest, in order to make their initial appearance. The time allowed between the arrest and the initial …show more content…
This document states the facts of the plaintiff’s action against the defendant and sets forth the damages, judgment, or other relief sought. Once the defendant receives the complaint or of summons, they will begin to serve their initial pleadings. These initial pleadings include the Answer, Counterclaim, Cross Claim, Motion to Quash Service of Summons, and the Motion to Strike. After the filing and service of the last pleading allowed by court rules, the parties begin the discovery period and in most cases, this occurs after a reply or motion to dismiss has been filed. Discovery comes in two forms: oral and written. Oral discovery consists of depositions, and written discovery includes interrogatories, request for admission, requests for the production of documents, and the request for mental or physical examination. Once all of this is done, a summary judgment may be appropriate if facts in the case are clear and the only question is how the law should be applied to those facts. This will allow the case to have no need to go to trial if the motion is granted. If this is denied, the case will proceed to trial. The trial of a civil case follows along the same guidelines of that of a criminal case with the only difference because that the case-in-chief does not exist in a civil proceeding. Once the opening statements are made, the introduction of evidence begins and closing statements are made. Once this is done, the judge gives the instructions to the jury and the deliberation is made. Once they are finished, the verdict is entered and the judgment is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system is made of rules that are in place to not only protect the victim and the convicted, but also the prosecution and the defense attorneys. The system is governed by these guidelines from the time a police officer suspects a crime all the way to the day the offender is released from prison. The steps for an individual to be convicted of a crime must start with the arrest, and fallow the process in order to the pre-trial, trial, and appeals. There are different guidelines that apply to state and federal cases. To effectively understand the criminal justice process a person must start at the bottom and follow the progression of the charge.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scarpelli Case Summary

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Due process requires a determination during the pre-revocation hearing. This is also named as Gagnon 1 hearing. Unlike in the criminal trials where the prosecution ought to establish all aspects of the offense charged beyond the reasonable doubt, at the revocation hearing the Commonwealth only has to prove a probation violation through the preponderance of evidence (Latessa & Smith, 2015). In Gagnon 11 hearing, the burden of proof is lowered to the preponderance of evidence meaning that more likely than not a person did not violate the probation terms. 3.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They will then determine if there is enough evidence to go to trial. The final step in this process is the arraignment. Here the defendant pleads guilty or not guilty. If the accused pleads guilty then no trial is held. However, if he or she pleads not guilty then they go to trial to prove their case.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The deponent is under oath to answer the questions truthfully. The statements taken at the deposition can be used at trial. Preparing for trial The defense and plaintiff can negotiate a settlement at any time during the legal proceedings. If the litigants cannot agree on a settlement, then the parties will prepare for a trial. Based on the preponderance of the evidence the court will decide if the case is worthy of a trial.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Preliminary hearings are conducted after an individual has been arraigned in the court. It is a process where the judge determines whether there is enough evidence for the case to be presented. Using a legal standard known as probable cause, the judge determines whether the government has provided substantial evidence that can reasonably convince a jury of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in question (Montemayor, 2014). A suspect is entitled to a preliminary hearing to ensure that he or she is protected from irrational arrest and detention. Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts include defense lawyers, prosecution, judges and juries. The job of the courts is to make sure the offenders are being given fair and upright lawsuits. Those who look for information,meaning the judges, listen to the case that is taking place and control the members to make sure that they are following all rules,laws, during the lawsuits. Particular cases have only a judge present while being tried, when others have a body of people that includes twelve citizens who made firm that the culpability or guiltlessness of a defendant proved by information that was brought while in trail. Sometimes judges make suggestions on how a sentence should be.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    121), however, parts of a trial can be closed if there should be an undercover informant. One has the right to have an impartial jury, unbiased with a jury trial. The Sixth Amendment assures a specific location or venue as to where the crime was committed, the trial must take place within that location. A suspect has the right to know why they are being held. The defendant has the right to be present during the trial to confront the opposing witness.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both originate from a dispute between two parties, they both have pretrial procedures, they both have discovery processes, and they are both brought before a judge and jury. The major differences between them is the requirement for more stringent efforts to prove a violation occurred in criminal cases, the discovery requirements, and the burden of proof required to establish guilt. The reason for this, is if found guilty of a criminal matter certain rights are taken away from the guilty party. For example, their freedom when incarcerated, right to vote, right to possess firearm, and the social stigmas associated with being a convicted…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sixth amendment guarantees the right to waive assistance of counsel and conduct one's own defense. In order to do so the judge over the case must first; make sure the defendant is competent to stand trial, advised of their rights, and warned of the dangers that come in to play upon self-representation. If the defendant has already hired a lawyer to handle his or her case then there is no need to waive their right to counsel. Unless therefore, the defendant wished to represent himself. Once it is known by police that the defendant has wished to hire a lawyer then the defendant is no longer subject to answer any further questions by police.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays