Miranda Rights After Conviction In The United States

Superior Essays
In the United States a person is arrested when a police officer believes an offense has taken place or is about to take place. In order for the police officer to make an arrest he or she must meet certain criteria they have to adhere to. Probable cause or reasonable suspicion is the legal standard which authorizes a police officer the right to make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search or obtain a warrant. When a person is arrested he or she must be read their Miranda rights. The Miranda rights emphasize that the person being arrested has the right to remain silent and that what they say can be used against them in court. They also have the right to a criminal defense lawyer during questioning. If they can’t afford a lawyer, one will be provided. The next step after arrest is the booking process which is conducted at the jail. Personal information is gathered during this process which includes fingerprints, photographs, personal items and eventually the person is placed into a holding cell. At this point in the arrest, the officer and the prosecutor will prepare the complaint before the first appearance with a judge. People that are arrested have the right to bail …show more content…
In Holmes case, the death penalty was pushed by the prosecutor but was unsuccessful. Holmes was also convicted of attempted murder which usually has a range of five to fifteen years in prison but it can be longer if a firearm was used or if serious injury was inflicted. Shooting people at a movie theater is definitely going to raise the severity of the punishment. Possessing explosives is a crime itself if it is not authorized, and in Holmes case he set the explosives in his house with the intention of hurting police officers. In effect, his penalty for possessing the explosives was more severe. The case was heard in Arapahoe county

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Police have probable cause to arrest passengers in a vehicle where an illegal substance are found, as the presence of drugs allows reasonable officers to conclude that probable causes exist that a crime has been committed in their presence. Due to the small and contained area of a vehicle it is reasonable to assume that all occupants have knowledge or possession of the illegal…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An arrest warrant is only issued with there is substantial evidence that the person to be arrested…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even if they do not have probable cause they can still question them and if after questioning them probable cause develops they can arrest them. The police can also…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    .When it comes to getting arrested the police can do it two ways, they can do it with a warrant or without one. However both must have probable cause. The fourth amendment is what protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The two important thing with this amendment is the requirements of probable cause to get a warrant and it how it prohibits unreasonable search and seizures.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments of the Constitution. It was created to exclude governmental power to citizen rights. The Bill of Rights, is a protection for an individual’s liberty. Built for a person’s freedom of speech, religion, and press. It arranges rules for due process of law and reserves all power not substituted to the Federal Government, to the people or the states, but imagine if the government stops granting you those rights, striping them away from you.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodney King Trial

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The police have been given the mandate to punish any wrongdoing done in their presence and to arrest any wrongdoer believed to have committed an offense in their sight, with or without a warrant of arrest.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution created a set of amendments to the Bill of Rights and these rights are meant for the citizens of the United States and the government cannot be able to take away these rights. In most cases, the rights of the people can be infringed due to the government officials such as the police officers they are meant to protect public safety. But towards the people who are being accused should not have their freedom infringed this is known as Miranda Rights. Miranda Rights are a set of laws placed after the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona where the accused was not offered a lawyer and Mr. Miranda was prosecuted and he was not informed of his 5th and 6th amendment. Miranda Rights are warnings given announced to the accused before an interrogation…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fourth amendment states that people have the right to be free from unreasonable seizures and searches. Therefore, probable cause must be issued for a police officer to demand a search warrant. Reasonable suspicion…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First off, before the trial even takes place the arrest must be legal. For the arrest to be legal there must not be an unreasonable search and seizure. There must have been a legally obtained search warrant or probable cause of arrest. Once arrested, the officer must state the Miranda rights (The right to counsel and remain silent). Furthermore, once put in front of the court the Grand Jury must weigh evidence to determine the amount of bail making sure it is not excessive.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dirty Harry: Film Analysis

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This means that a suspect has rights, and when a police officer violates these rights, the police officer in question has broken the law and as a result the suspect gets released from jail, as enacted in the movie Dirty Harry. Additionally, legislative principles link with liberal ideas about due process, whereby punishment can only be imposed in cases where the defendant’s liability has been proved beyond reasonable doubt (Cross 2010: 50). This therefore means that, law enforcers can only stop, search and arrest on the foundation of rational suspicion. In addition, the law enforcement officer must provide a search warrant before searching a suspect’s property (Dirty Harry, 1971). Detective Callahan’s failure to do this in the movie Dirty Harry, resulted in the evidence being inadmissible in the court of law, and in turn the suspect was released from police custody.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in the other hand, there is quite amount of people who went to jail, because of they think that they know their Miranda rights,, and as a result, they are barely listening to what the police officer say in the outset of the interrogation, because they often wrongly believe their silence can be used against them in…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays