Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
13 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Act and Section and Amended act and section |
Introduced in The homicide act 1957 S2
Amended by The coroners and Justice act 2009 s52 |
|
D must suffer from an abnormality of mental functioning which |
Arose from a recognised mental condition
Substantially impaired the defendants ability to done or more things set out in s52 (1A)
Provides an explanation of the D actions or omissions |
|
Byrne test |
Was the D's mental functioning so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable person would term it abnormal |
|
What is a recognised medical condition |
Includes psychological and physical conditions. D has to provide medical evidence (Campbell) |
|
What are recognised medical conditions |
Psychopathy (Byrne) BPS (Ahluwalia) Paranoia (Martin) PTSD, Schizophrenia or bipolar (Gray) ADS (wood) Brain injury (Luc Thiet Thuan) Diabetes Epilepsy (Campbell) Chronic depression (seers) |
|
Lloyd |
Substantial impairment doesn't mean total impairment or trivial or minimal |
|
Golds |
Substantial impairment is for the jury to decide |
|
Coroners and justice act 2009 s52 (1A) includes |
To understand nature of the D's conduct
Form a rational judgement
Exercise self control |
|
How do you work out if the substantial impairment provides an explanation |
Must show a link between the abnormality of mental functioning and killing
Doesn't have to be the only factor that caused the D to kill but must be significant |
|
Dowds |
Intox alone isn't enough to establish it |
|
Dietschmann |
If intox makes mental condition worse then it must be ignored |
|
Wood |
Jury decides if ADS cause abnormality of mental functioning |
|
Stewart |
Jury looks at D is able to resist drinking and if they could control how much they drank |