ECHR And Mandatory Sentencing Essay

Improved Essays
The ECHR and Mandatory Sentencing
The European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty established for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (reference goes here) The European Court of Human Rights established this by drawing upon inspiration from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ECHR ratified this treaty and continually ensures all 47 articles contained in the doctrine are adhered to by all member states. (reference goes here) If we look at the fundamental nature of the principles as stated in the ECHR, they can be said to represent ideal states of affairs regarding the relations between individual citizens and the state in subject jurisdictions. As such, these principles are derived from moral
…show more content…
The ECHR believe this mechanism will prevent prolonged and unnecessary imprisonment. The ECHR believe proportionality is of paramount importance within the framework of sentencing, in other words, as previously stated, while a life sentence may not seem unfavourable it must be proportionate to the crime committed.(Reference goes here)In recent years the ECHR have been presented with an increasing number of cases regarding fairness of mandatory life sentences and subsequently following a series of judgements in Strasbourg which include ‘Weeks v. United Kingdom(1988)’, ‘Wynne v. United Kingdom (1995)’and’ Stafford v. United Kingdom (2002)’, the Parole Board of any state must now determine the lawfulness of the continued detention of an offender following the punishment element of his prison sentence.(Reference goes here) The case of Vinter and others v. the UK 2012 also illustrates how term of life imprisonment without possibility of review is a breach of prisoners’ rights through inhuman and degrading treatment thus violating article 3 of the European Convention.(REFERENCE GOES …show more content…
By definition, mandatory sentencing provisions impose various strict limits on the ability of courts to consider aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing. Both factors ordinarily considered at sentencing are not explored when sentencing an offender convicted of murder and no discrepancies are made in terms of the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances of the individual. There is great variation in the seriousness of crime, thus the factors which mitigate should have bearing on the MLS. For example, the perpetrator may have a mental disorder or disability which lowers the degree of their culpability. The case of Commonwealth v. Demond Chatman illustrates how mitigating factors are not deliberated at the sentencing process. In 2001 in Boston Demond Chatman shot his mother and in 2002 was convicted of the murder. Chatman filed a motion for a new trial claiming that he was not competent to stand trial, the motion was denied after a non-evidentiary hearing. During the trial period Chatman was analysed by various medical professionals, who all came to the conclusion he was not of sound mind. Dr Robert H. Joss, a forensic psychologist, at the time stated that the defendant suffers from "a long standing mental disease that is best described as a schizoaffective disorder with prominent paranoid delusions. This disease is a substantial disorder of thought, diand perception which grossly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On May 20, 1998, Kipland Kinkel went on a shooting rampage at Thurstone High School. After the shooting spree Kipland was arrested and convicted of four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, with a total sentence time of 111 years and eight months. Four years into the 111-year sentence, the attorneys of Kipland Kinkel appealed the initial sentencing. In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” Judge Haselton offers information on the original trial, the grounds of the appeal and the state’s decision to uphold the sentence. Judge Haselton utilizes the rhetorical tools of ethos, pathos and logos to support the court’s decision to deny the appeal.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Bright takes a clear stance when discussing capital punishment. He associates the death penalty with the many other practices which have long been abandoned. These practices include whipping, branding, cutting off appendages, maiming, and other primitive forms of punishment. It is clear that Stephen Bright believes the United States should abandon the death penalty. In fact, his essay is written in a way which assumes that the United States will inevitable abandon capital punishment.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that by making some changes to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines would in the long run make our justice system better able to serve the people. I know many of you, like I believe there should be no change to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines, but have you or I for that matter really thought through what that means for people like Lee Wollard or Trina Garnett? Lee Wollard didn’t hurt the young man, he protected his daughter and family, yet is spending twenty years behind bars because he fired a warning shot into his home. Trina Garnett was an abused teenager with a mental illness that needed medical care not sent to prison.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As many of you already know the United States has the highest percentage of its population behind bars compared to any other country. This may be related to the fact that a majority of petty crimes require mandatory sentencing. Politicians such as District Attorney Dan Conley believe that mandatory sentencing is an efficient way to protect the population from corrupt individuals as well as decreasing crime rates. However, housing all of these individuals is not cheap, the funding for this endeavor is taken directly from the taxes all of us have to pay. While I agree that petty crime offenders should compensate in some way for their crimes, further destroying their lives is not the answer.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Atkins v. Virginia involved an 18-year old named Daryl Atkins. After a day of drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana with a friend, the two walked to a convenience store where they abducted an airman from Langley Air Force Base (Paust, 1998). The two men forced themselves into his pickup truck and drove him to an ATM teller where he was forced to withdraw money at gunpoint (Paust, 1998). Atkins and his accomplish then drove the airman to a remote area and shot him eight times. Atkins pleaded guilty to abduction and robbery of the young airman but pleaded not guilty to the murder (Paust, 1998).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On October 24 1993 a twelve year old Tracy Latimer suffering from a severe form of cerebral palsy was killed by her father out of compassion. The father, Robert Latimer was then sentenced to the full twenty-five years in prison because mandatory minimum sentencing was barring any reduction to the punishment. Regardless of the circumstances, mandatory minimums set standards in sentencing that will prohibit any punishment lower than the specified level. Despite Robert’s sympathetic intentions he received a severe penalty for his actions. It was worried that if Robert managed to receive a lesser punishment other criminals would argue the validity of their sentence as well ( 'Compassionate homicide ': The law and Robert Latimer, 2010).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Texas Deterrence Effect

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Snell displays a table that shows the possible capital offenses that can cause a person to be charged with capital punishment. A majority of the states punish first degree murder, capital murder, and aggravated murder with state execution (Snell, 2010). The United States Department of Health and Human Services defines homicide as a death caused by “an injury purposely inflicted by other persons” (Bailey, 1990). Hjalmarsson investigates whether or not felony homicides versus non- felony homicides have a better deterrence effect (2012). The study shows that the probability of a variation in the murder rate is dependent on the timing of the execution.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are thousands of nonviolent drug offenders serving a lengthy mandatory prison sentencing within federal prisons. Years ago, during the “war on drugs”, this was President Richard Nixon quick fix to the dramatic growth on drug use and dealing. Decades later, maybe sooner, it has come to light that this mandatory sentencing mostly affected African American Men. For example, powder cocaine versus crack cocaine, were said to be two different drugs and crack cocaine dealers would serve a mandatory sentencing if in possession of such. Crack cocaine was an easy drug to acquire in urban neighbourhoods while powder cocaine was seen as a much prestige drug used among a more rich community.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    oluntary Manslaughter: Voluntary manslaughter is the conviction given if a defendant who would otherwise have been found guilty of murder, successfully pleads one of two specific defences. These two defences are provocation, and diminished responsibility, and are both laid out in the Homicide Act 1957. The defence of provocation was a common law defence before the Homicide Act was created and brought into power. It is currently detailed in section three of this act, and is a two-part test.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are over two million inmates in our nation’s prison system and sentencing has always been a reflection of the current sentiments of society. Before the introduction of determinate sentencing in the early eighties, the States followed an indeterminate sentencing model. It was the pressure from society to have the “punishment fit the crime” that caused our justice system to make changes in their sentencing guidelines. With these changes came mandatory minimums, when most prisoners were serving only a portion of their sentences, and the introduction to the determinate model. We will compare these two models of sentencing and the effects it has on our justice system as a whole.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham were the founders of the classical theory phenomenon (Piliavin, 1986). The concept was based on several principles, which entailed three main ideologies; free will, where actions are based on one’s own rationality (Burke 2014), more so punishment should apply to the crime as opposed to the criminal, as the theorists believed that a certainty in punishment would deter both the public and criminal (Akers 1999). The perspective adopted throughout will focus on the theories inability to justify the actions of violent homicide offenders, such as Jeffrey Dahmer, and how the high recidivism rates fail to support specific deterrence, even when making the punishment fit the crime. Free will assumes that all individuals…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. The issue we will be identifying today is the death penalty. We describe this as an execution, which is punishment by death. We will be addressing the cruelty and human rights.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘We cannot succeed when half of us are held back’ How true is this quote by Malala Yousafzai and how does this relate to Human Rights violations? It’s hard to define what human rights are; there is just too much to consider. Generally, human rights are simply referred to as the rights a human has. Of course, there are heaps of rights worldwide aimed towards certain groups of people; however, human rights are the only set of rights that are applied to everyone, universally.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays