• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/49

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

49 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

strain theory--what are criminal subcultures oriented towards?

theft

strain theor--what are conflict subcultures oriented towards?

fighting

strain theory--what are retreatist subcultures oriented towards?

drugs

Agnew New General Strain Theory (GST)

refer to events or conditions that are disliked by an individual that leads to deviance--objective or subjective


1. lose something good


2. receive something bad


3. fail to get something we want

objective GST

events or conditions which are disliked by most people or at least by most people in a group

strains can lead to crime and deviance when:

1. are seen as high in magnitude


2. seen as unjust


3. are accomplished by low self control


4. create some pressure or incentive to engage in criminal coping

specific strains that are most likely to cause crime

1. parental rejection


2. child abuse


3. negative secondary school experiences


4. chronic unemployment


5. criminal victimization


6. discriminating gender and race/ethnicity

social learning theories

assume people are blank slates and "learn to be criminal/deviant

motivation for social learning theories

rooted in social relationships

macro social learning theories

1. social disorganization theory


2. subcultural theory

micro social learning theories

1. differential association


2.social learning theory

differential Association Theory

states that once norms favoring crime/deviance exist, learning begins--process

4 assumptions of the differential association theory

1. learning occurs in small, intimate groups


2. learning includes techniques of committing deviant acts as well as attitudes about deviant behavior (attitudes shift as we grow)


3. persons become deviant bc of an excess of norms favorable to deviant behavior--the more norms we consider good the more likely to be deviant


4. varies in terms of frequency, duration, and priority

Akers Social Learning Theory

overcomes sutherlands simlicity--people learn definitions favorable or unfavorable to crime through interactions with others.crime is learned through 4 processes

4 proccess of learning in Akers social learning theory

1. differential association--we seek those who are deviant


2. define as positive or negative


3. imitate those people


4. differential reinforcement--when positive reward system more likely to do again (operant conditioning)


5. individuals engage in crime because of the dif enforcement (+ or -)

engaging in deviance vs being a deviant

identity


1. behavior is exposed


2. abstract status comes to bear on personal experience (one experiences discrimination or some other form of neg reax for first time as a result of their condition or behavior)

7 stages of deviant identity career

1. people are caught and publically exposed as deviant


2. people alter their attitudes toward the deviant "retrospective interpretation"


3. development of what Goffman called "spoiled identity"--deviant becomes master status


4. exclusion by "normals" of conventional society


5. inclusion in deviant groups (fine with them if they dont consider you as deviant


6. differential treatment


7. internalize deviant label

labeling theory

our behavior and identity are strongly influenced by our interaction with S/O--character based on social world. examines the consequences of being labeled deviant

looking glass self

we are based on social world and how people react to us


1. gestures to us


2. imagine how we appear to them


3. judge how others evaluate us


4. from these judgments we develop a self concept

consequences of a label

1. may produce self fulfilling prophecy


2. label may change in how we perceive ourselves


3. may change the way individuals, groups, or social institutions interact w us--stigmatized, loss of social bonds, changes in associations, strain from unemployment


4. changes increases likelihood of further deviant behavior

primary deviance (LT)

behavior we engage in or what others believe. individuals may drift in and out of it, relatively insignificant

secondary deviance (LT)

changes self conception--interaction


think you committed a deviant act even though you didn't, people see you as deviant.pivotal, central, and engulfing activity to which a person has become committed

auxilary traits

social preconceptions that people associate with certain statuses

preventing and responding to the deviant label

1. the repentant deviant--"i'm sorry"


2. sick deviant


3. enemy deviant--"i don't carei'll do it again"


4. cynical deviant

accounts

people at risk of label deviant usually maintain self image and we use tactics to normalize their behavior

vocab of motive

used in convo to present legit explanations for their actions

Sykes and Marza techniques of neutralization

allow us to violate general belief systems and raionalize our behavior either prospectively or retrospectively


1. denial of responsibility


2. denial of injury


3. denial of victim


4. condemnation of the condemers


5. appeal to higher loyalties

denial of injury

"no harm no foul"

denial of victim

"this person is in the wrong"

condemnation of the condemners

"i did it for a good reason, he deserved it"

appeal to higher loyalties

"i stole but for a good reason"

subjective strains

events or conditions that are disliked by the particular person or person being examined

strain theory

how the structural conditions of society shape or influence whether crime occurs within society. motivational and macro theory

merton: how is anomie in American society linked to criminal and deviant behavior?

1. anomie results from a faulty relationship between goals and legit means of access to them


2. goals: what is the american dream


3. means: do we all have the same legit means

merton version strain theory

focused on why some groups were more likely to engage in crime and deviance


motivated to commit crim when prevented from achieving success

reasons some groups more likely to commit crime and deviance based on strain theory

1. belief that everyone is encourage to pursue success--middle class existance--but some lack legit channels]


2. poor parenting


3. disadvantaged schools and neighborhoods


4. discrimination in the job market

how does strain lead to crime and behaviors

1. achieving goals through illegitimate means


2. reject goals of monetary success and middle class status--substitute them with goals one can achieve


3. hostility towards society--may lead them to emphasizing goals conducive to crime


4. reject cultural norms and engage in crime or other deviant behavior

ohlins criticisms of strain theory

1. only focused on lower income individuals--self report studies show equal rates of delinquency in middle income family


2. never identified barriers to achievement beyond social class


3. never identified strain beyond monetary success


4. why some strained individuals turn to delinquency while others do not

assumptions for social learning theories

1. people are not predisposed to committing deviant or criminal acts


2. everything we are is the accumulation of our experiences and associations

Akers social learning theory differential reinforcement

1. the balance of anticipated or actual rewards and punishments that follow behavior depends on the past


2. individuals engage in crime because of differential reinforcement--positive or negative

subculture theory

a group of people who share a distinctive set of cultural beliefs and behaviors--same elements of social learning

social disorganization theory

macro level theory. explain why some areas have higher rates of crime and deivance than other neighborhood. asks how the social structure of neighborhoods affect crime and deviance and how community disorganization cause criminal and/or deviant behavior

rejected compositional effect in social disorganization theory

1. crime and deviance were not based on who the residents were


2. as immigrants moved in and out of neighborhoods, crime rates remained relatively stable over time

suggested contextual effect for social disorganization theory

1. crime and deviance were products of the characteristics of the neighborhood


2. certain neighborhood characteristics lead to social disorganization--contributed to more crime and deviance

social disorganization theory--juvenile delinquency in urban areas

1. higher crime rates in certain parts of chicago


2. rates were stable over time


3. however, immigration and migration changed the demographic composition of these neighborhoods


4. perhaps "traits of neighborhoods" can help to explain crime and delinquency

macro social forces for social disorganization theory

1. loss of jobs


2. exodus of middle class and upper class


3. breakdown of basic social institutions


4. redlining and public housing


5. lack of available marriage partners

social and cultural isolation for social disorganization theory

1. lack of contract with mainstream society


2. lack of conventional role models


3. system of values and norms develops--counter to accepted culture of society


4. form of cultural adaptation

how to develop a deviant identity

1. behavior is exposed


2. abstract status comes to bear on personal experience

symbolic interactionism

people act toward things based on the meaning of those things have for them, and these meanings are derived from social interaction and modified through interpretation