Study your flashcards anywhere!

Download the official Cram app for free >

  • Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

A key: Read text to speech.a key


Play button


Play button




Click to flip

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
CL Ignorance of the Law
D does not know that the particular act is crim.
Generally defense is not allowed, but in Ratzlaf Ct rev'd D's conviction of willfully structuring monetary transactions holding that his ignorance of the legal duty not to structure the transaction made his act "nonwillful" under the stat
CL Mistake of Law
D supsects his activity may be subject to crim. but concludes his actions are not crim. = irrelevant. Except in Cheeks (thought taxes didn't apply to him) stats using "willfully"
CL Specific intent crimes
any mistake of law, no matter how unreasonable, would be a valid defense to a specific intent crime
MPC Ignorance or mistake of law
2.02(9) expressly provides that neither K nor R or N as to whether conduct constitutes an offense or as to the existence, meaning, or application. Exception - if state has not been publ or made reasonably available or if D acted in rel. on an official statement of law that is later deemed invalid.
CL Mistake of Fact
Reasonable mistake of fact negate MR & D is acquitted.
Mistake of fact in specific intent = D acquitted.
CL mistake of legal fact
No amount of reasonableness will exculpate. (E.g., firearm, stolen, intoxicating liquor, peace officer)
MPC Mistake of fact
2.04(1) - ignorance or mistake as to a matter of fact is a defense if it negatives the MR req. to est. a material element of the offense.