Recklessness, And Negligence: The Four Levels

Decent Essays
According to the Latin dictionary the word “mens rea” means or translates to “guilty mind.” You cannot be truly guilty unless you are aware of the dangerous act you are committing. There are different degrees to mens rae that break up the levels that can be involved. The four levels are known as intent, knowledge, recklessness, and negligence
The first degree of a criminal case is intent. This is the fully aware and conscious desire and want to break the law or commit a dangerous act. If you have been targeting to rob a house or targeting to murder someone you would be committed with intent to kill or criminal intent. There are two different categories of intent. There is what is known as general intent and then there is specific intent.
General intent requires that the offender had the intent or the mind set to commit an illegal act. For example if you have a condition that causes you to randomly faint and you are
…show more content…
You have to be in a specific state of mind in order to commit a crime. For example if you had intent to break and enter and you proceed with that act, you ad specific intent to commit that specific crime even though you were aware of the outcomes. Intent is a state of mind and because of that it can be hard to prove but it still is possible.
Reckless is an intent that an offender takes knowing that it will cause them harm, it is along the lines of negligence but a higher level of it. Depending on the state it may vary but there are usually guidelines that can prove recklessness. For example drinking and driving in all states is considered reckless conduct. Driving at high speeds in an area where there are other pedestrians can put yourself and others in endangerment. In most cases recklessness can act in legal consequences, such as lawsuits with personal injury, or compensation for lost medical

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Anthony Douglas Elonis, Petitioner, v. United States., No. 13-983 (2014) Factual History: Anthony Douglas Elonis actively uses Facebook, a social networking Web site. After seven years of marriage, Elonis’s wife left him and took their two young children with her. Elonis changed his user name on Facebook to a fake name. He posted a threating photo of one of his co-workers and himself on Halloween. After his co-worker’s found out about the photo, Elonis posted a status threating to kill multiple friends and co-workers.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Of Negligence

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages

    After Officer Onge explained what to do in case of emergency, his first call came in. Dispatch had received a call from a gentleman by the name of Mr. Jenkins. The situation was that Mr. Jenkins was riding near the construction on Canton Connecter when a piece of rock fell out of a dump truck and damaged the windshield of his vehicle. Mr. Jenkins needed an officer to come so that he could file this accident with his insurance company. After some miscommunication, and trying for find this gentleman for over 15 minutes, we finally found him and his jeep on the side of an exit.…

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Us Vs Cartlidge Case

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    First, in a crime of attempt there are two major factors that must be present: criminal intent, and a criminal act. The intent must be done purposefully. Meaning that if a man died because his brother shot him, the brother would have had to purposefully pick up the gun and had the intent to shoot him. For a criminal act to occur, the defendant must have gone beyond preparation and moved toward the perpetration of the crime. It is important to remember that If perpetration has not occurred there is no criminal act.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 a) There are significant charges that could be laid against Alfred, Emily, and Buzfuz. The charges of failure to preserve their child’s life are laid against Alfred and Emily because the parents showed disregard for the safety of their son Job. Alfred and Emily have a duty imposed by the law as parents to provide the necessaries of life to their son under “s. 215(1)” to ensure that their young son Job receives his daily insulin injections in order to benefit his health. This implies that the failure to implement the duty disregards the health of their son to whom the duty is owed, and causes Job to be in a state of unconsciousness. The charges of manslaughter by criminal negligence [s. 222(5)(b)] will also be laid against Alfred and Emily due to their reckless disregard against their son Job.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Deliberate indifference is define when a professional knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an inmate’s health or safety. Even though it is difficult to identify what does and does not constitute deliberate indifference, courts have recognized several factual scenarios where deliberate indifference exists. For example, in Helling v. McKinney, officials expose an inmate to ETS and serious future health risk support by scientific evidence constitute as deliberate…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Humans, being the complex creatures that they are, are fully capable of making cognizant, rational, intentional decisions. However, in some instances, a person is unable to form or control his or her own thoughts because he or she suffers from a mental illness. Moreover, in today’s pop culture, persons with mental illnesses are portrayed as villainous.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Frequently, statutes don’t clearly state whether the offenses they describe require specific or general intent. Rather, courts determine a crime’s intent element by following the general rule that terms like “knowingly” and “voluntarily” denote general intent (as in "knowingly and voluntarily use force against another"). Terms that describe something more than knowledge and voluntariness, like purpose, tend to indicate specific intent (as in "knowingly and voluntarily use force against someone with the intent to disable him or…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Legal defense of “Not Criminally Responsible” as result of psychological disorders Psychology is used in the legal system in many ways, whether it is to assess the competency to stand trial, competency of eyewitness testimony, or asses the dangerousness of the psychopathy (Costano & Costanzo, 2013). In recent years a vast number of defences has used the argument that their clients are incompetent to stand trial or are not criminally responsible due to insanity or other psychological issues whether it be schizophrenia or PTSD, all in attempts for either lighter sentences or complete exoneration. A growing concern among the public has been the reliability and the validity of the psychological tests used in these cases – are the accused really…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Criminal intent deals with a defendant’s state of mind when committing a crime. Criminal act refers to the specific acts performed by a defendant in carrying out a crime. Criminal intent is often referred to as the mens rea, which is the Latin term for ‘‘guilty mind.’’ For most crimes, the prosecution must prove ‘‘beyond a reasonable doubt’’ that the defendant intended to commit the crime for which the defendant has been charged. In practical terms, a person’s ‘‘intent’’ relates to that person’s state of mind while performing an accompanying…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Negligence is conduct by an individual that drops below a reasonable standard of care and causes harm to another person. An individual has a duty to act reasonably when interacting with others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others, that individual is…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Careless driving is an offence related to general poor driving and includes a variety of behaviours, such as tailgating, failing to look properly and sudden braking. It is defined in law (section 3ZA of the Road Traffic Act 1988) as driving that "falls below what is expected of a competent and careful driver" and "driving without reasonable consideration for other persons only if those persons are inconvenienced by his driving". The offences for careless driving include driving "without due care and attention" and "without reasonable consideration for other persons" (section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988). Examples of heavy penalties should be imposd to careless drivers are drivers who drive carelessly shall punished with a fine, demerit points given to careless drivers and court shall order…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper gives a short introduction of tort law and mainly focus on the standard of care, how the courts determining what is the ‘reasonable person’ and whether there are some exceptions to the courts. The law of tort is the law of civil liability for wrongfully injury which provides remedies to individuals harmed by the wrongful conduct of others in order to protect an individual’s private rights. There are two major categories of torts: intentional tort and negligent tort. The general principle of negligence is concerned with compensating people who have injured or damaged and thus a defendant will be negligent if he or she falling below the standard of the ordinary reasonable man in the same situation. A person will be liable for their…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction My argument is that the law of intention is clear, simple, and still fit for purpose. Intention is one of the categories falling under the mens rea of murder. The law uses intention as one of the main methods of classifying offences, such as deciding between murder or manslaughter. The presence or absence of intention is what the law is interested in, not the motive behind the actions in question.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays