Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
McGovern v AG |
Exclusively charitable
No politics purpose |
|
|
Pemsel |
Poverty, education, religion, and any other community benefit |
|
|
Re Coulthurst |
Poverty means ‘going short’ |
|
|
Re Hopkins’ Will Trust |
Education is beyond the state’s duty.
Research must have educational value to the researcher or create educational material or improve communicable knowledge |
|
|
Gilmour v Coats |
Praying is not public benefit as it cannot be proven in a court of law |
|
|
Thornton v Howe |
The courts will not fail a charitable trust for religion, just because they disagree with its beliefs |
|
|
AG v Charity Commission for England and Wales |
The public aspect is not stringent for as it could benefit a small class or the whole population |
|
|
Re Resch |
Private fee-paying hospital benefitted the public by reducing the need for beds |
|
|
Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission of England and Wales |
Independent schools could be beneficial by relieving pressure on public schools |
|
|
Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd |
It’s not charitable if there is a personal connection |
|
|
Dingle v Turner |
Personal connection should be based on degree |
|
|
Re Broadbent |
Check carefully if it has actually failed |
|
|
Kings v Bultitude |
Specific intention (e.g. specific church) cannot lead to cy-pres as not general charitable intention |
|
|
Re Faraker |
If amalgamated but continued purpose, funds could be given to the amalgamation |
|
|
Re Slevin |
Lack of general charitable intention is irrelevant it intestator dies before failure of trust |
