The Civil Law and The Religious Law Essay

1060 Words 5 Pages
In the world the legal system are based on one of three basic systems. There is Western law which is divided into civil law and common law. Then there is Religious law. Each country has its own unique legal system that they include variations of civil, common and religious law. Some have a combination of all three.
Civil Law are based on concepts, categories, and rules derived from Roman law, with some influence of canon law, sometimes largely supplemented or modified by local custom or culture. The civil law tradition, though secularized over the centuries and placing more focus on individual freedom, promotes cooperation between human beings (PAUL M. HEBERT LAW CENTER). Whereas Common law are a body of rules that delineate private
…show more content…
God or Gods reveal these laws to the prophets or religion’s founder. Religion history and development are critical due to the evens of giving the law .As in Islam; Mohammad is the founder and prophet of
Islam, who was to unite a hostile and culturally disparate people. Mohammad had vision where he could hear and repeat the word of God, which his disciples recorded and this became the Koran. Religious law is divine, therefore it’s eternal and perfect and it prevents challenges. We measure sin by God’s laws which are unchanging. Us as Human beings are naturally sinful. God’s answers to our sins are punitive. Jesus’ death on the cross is obligatory as a sacrifice to provide the only substratum for malignant humans to elude deserved penalization.
A religious body or doctrine officially sanctioned by the state is known as a State Religion is. When a state has an official religion, while they are not secular, they are no viewed necessarily as a theocracy. Theocracy is a form of government in which a country is ruled by religious leaders (Webster dictionary). The civil leader is assumed to have a straight personal association with the civilization's religion in a pure theocracy. In both theocracies and some religious jurisdictions, thorough protestors may cause religious offense. The government does not lawfully adopt a particular religion when the opposing legal systems are secular states or may have a

Related Documents