Comparing Plato And Aristotle's Code Of Medical Ethics

Improved Essays
It is impossible to determine what the future holds for anyone. Whatever decisions are made at the beginning of a life, for example, can have consequences for the future. Doctors are often placed in positions where they need to make decisions that could change the lives of people negatively or positively. The moral and ethical issues of a doctors decision become extremely difficult when it comes to negative consequences. As the video Does Doctor Know Best suggest, the difficulty lies in the conscience. If the rules and regulations cannot be applied, the doctor has to rely on their conscience. But there is the conflict between the doctor’s paternalism and the patient’s autonomy. The discussion then would reflect on the actions that the doctor would take when it comes to making decisions.
One of the issues with patient/doctor relationships is that the patient has autonomy over the decisions the
…show more content…
The doctors that are given the choices can only reflect on their own conscience to make the right decisions. As said already, therefore, each need to have virtues, ethics, and morals to be ingrained their beings. Even though Plato and Aristotle are very similar in thinking, Aristotle would be a better choice. This is simply in terms of the fact that Plato changed much of his thought structure over the years of his life (Frede 2003, n.p). Aristotle also built his philosophy on God, and on the disputes he had with Plato’s writings. For moral, and ethical decisions, it would be more helpful than to use the writings of Aristotle, as his work has been consistent as opposed to that of Plato. This does not mean that one should not adhere to the words of Plato as well as he was indeed the teacher of Aristotle. For the purpose here, though, it is a better option to choose the Aristotle

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Such decisions regarding patients with severe and deteriorating illness should be processed with respect to the patient’s condition becoming worse with time. Having an ethics board or a medical community to alleviate the pressure of a single doctor making a decision for a patient who is not able to act autonomously would allow for a treatment plan to be determined earlier. In Mary’s case, the court ruling prevented the doctor’s from acting to save her…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jehovah’s Witness: Scenario 1 It is a doctor’s duty to use their medical experience and knowledge to provide their patients with the most effective medical treatments. However, mentally capable adult patients are ultimately able to accept or refuse medical treatment. Patients are protected by the concept of autonomy, which indicates “individuals are able to make their own decisions and have them respected by others” (Weiss & Lonnquist, 2015). Patients of sound mind are also protected by their right to provide informed consent to medical care before a doctor can legally treat them.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical inquiry, from Plato’s view, seems to have a very vital and practical purpose in the health and stability of the polis. And of course for Aristotle, it is the use of reason that provides us the surest way to the good life; for if we can live moderately, and discover the virtues in life we must pursue to achieve the good life. Reason here enables us to free ourselves from vice and conform our desires to a rational plan or set of…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, a medical provider’s actions should benefit the patient in keeping them alive and healthy, meaning the actions of the physicians should cause no unnecessary harm to the patient. However, “physicians may feel that without full authority to make decisions, he or she should not assume responsibility for outcomes.” Without the authority from their own point of view, physicians cannot make decisions. If they had to ask the patient what kind of treatment he or she wants then it is hard for doctors to determine what cure is right for the patient. The doctors also said that life is valuable for them to save his life, but they still should have listened to Dax.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Doctor’s responsibilities are to help the patient to get them well and make them healthy and sound. But Some of the procedure which can be denied by the doctor because of its negative effect on patient. A doctor may refuse a patient’s request provided the refusal leaves the patient no worse off than the patient would have been had the patient never met that doctor in the first place. Even though sometimes, Doctors have more objections to filling patient request for certain procedures or objections may be on the medication that patients are having. When a doctor tries to figure out what is best for the patient, they must find out in both way how it is going to affect the patient or not but more consciousness is issue when someone comes to the…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    End Of Life

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages

    175). If we think about it, it is not really a dilemma because the doctor is biased. He uses his own experiences into thinking that everyone is the same. If he tells the patient first, he could practice autonomy by accepting the patient’s way of care in the family. He can be cultural competent at the same time by considering how the patient’s family practice in medicine, especially in the end-of-life…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a variety of different aspects which can play a role within a certain nation or cultures take on patient autonomy. Informing a patient of their true cancer diagnosis is a fairly recent practice. However currently it is legally required in the United States for physician- patient communication to be characterized by a accent on patient autonomy. However Japan holds a very distinct religious and cultural past. The aim of this study is to compare the outlook toward ethical decision making and autonomy issues among academic and community physicians and patients of medical center outpatient clinics in Japan and the United States.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a monopoly society such as America, individuals rely on the decisions made by experts. In a medical environment, physicians are expected to care and heal for their patients. Medical paternalism is practiced when individuals let doctors decide the fate of a person to do a physician’s complex knowledge. Although physicians and patients share the goal of improving the patient’s health, and that the ideology that the physician knows what is best, does not mean that medical paternalism is ethically correct. The readings of Goldman and Groopman demonstrate that the limitation of a patient’s liberty to choose may not lead to the most efficient outcome.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As regards autonomy, the patient's desire to waive the bend it must match care and then, even if the doctor believes the patient does not take the decision maintains his or her own values (Agich,…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between a physician and their patient is one that should be composed of understanding and trust, as the intent of both parties is a shared value alleviating pain and overall content. However, there is uncertainty in the medical community when determining who “knows best” – the patient or the doctor. Is the patient entitled to the knowledge their doctor has concerning their case, or should the doctor be conservative in their explanations in an attempt to spare the patient’s psychological turmoil. This debate is exemplified in the article “Beneficence Today, or Autonomy (Maybe) Tomorrow” as the course of treatment for the patient, Monica, is reliant upon the doctors’ decision to either withhold information about the severity…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the principle of respect for autonomy, patients have the right to seek, accept, and ultimately refuse care. The physician that performs the procedure against the patient’s will and without informed consent is also a key player. Respecting the patient's autonomy means that the physician cannot impose treatments. At a public policy level, medical professionals have an opportunity to be a voice of reason by pointing out when legislative and regulatory measures intended to be safeguards, interfere…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The refusal of observations by John could potentially place his health at risk by preventing early detection of deterioration, this left the MDT with a moral dilemma. When discussing ethical dilemmas it was important in John’s case to involve all members of the MDT. Rich and Butts (2014) suggest that ethical decisions should involve all healthcare professionals in a patients care intervention. Similarly Finlay (2008) encourages the involvement of the patient in discussing ethical problems along with the healthcare professionals (in Ellis, 2015).…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophical problem surrounding medical paternalism is that it is considered morally unacceptable for a physician to veto one’s autonomy and act paternalistically by intentionally lying, providing false information, or withholding information. By acting in this way, the physician is limiting the patients’ ability to make a completely autonomous decision for themselves. This allows for the question “is medical paternalism ever justified”? In this paper, I will argue in support of Zembaty’s thesis that medical paternalism may be justified if acting non-paternalistically would potentially destroy the patient’s autonomy. For the purpose of this paper, medical paternalism will refer to a physician interfering with a patient’s autonomy with…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Actions that are right or wrong is all a matter of a difference of opinion amongst individuals. What they learn from their family, where they grew up, what institutions they attend, their religious views, and their reflection of themselves and the world around them, all influence their morals and ethical beliefs. New ideas are constantly emerging causing us to consistently review and reconsider our beliefs. One idea that emerged and caused ethical consideration is the goal of keeping ill persons alive. This first came in the nineteenth century and has since given rise to moral questions on the care for patients.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite what many might think, a patient 's right to refuse medical treatment has a very important meaning in the lives of many. People who have medical complications must learn to work with doctors and or surgeons in hospitals. With having the right to refuse medical treatment patients feel as if they have more power over their own health and future. Even though surgeons are qualified in making medical treatment decisions, patients should have the right to refuse medical treatment options. Patients should have the right to consider all medical options based on risk factors, success and effectiveness, and their living-will.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays