Autonomy In Thouh Dax's Case

Improved Essays
From Dax’s case, we know that he had been burnt seriously and he also received treatment from physicians. Even thouh Dax refuses to have the treatment to save him, physicians tried their best to save Dax’s life. Autonomy means that the patient decides what treatment they need or do not need to improve their life. Dax has the right to make decisions to die. He has the right to choose what he wants in life, even though the physicians were trying their best to save his life. On the other hand, the quality of life meant everything to him, which relates to autonomy, meaning that he could decide what treatment he should get. Additionally, one, who has autonomy rights needs to be competent, meaning they should understand the treatment options, …show more content…
The physician's job is to treat the patient. In addition, the physicians are the experts and should make the decisions for the patients because if there was a similar case as Dax’s, such as someone getting burned from fire or getting a car accident, the physicians would do something to keep the patient alive. They must do their job to help the patient. The doctors had to keep Dax alive because it was their job to benefit him by doing their work, but Dax also didn't agree to have the treatment. He decided he didn’t want to live his life, even before the treatment he was receiving. Also, a medical provider’s actions should benefit the patient in keeping them alive and healthy, meaning the actions of the physicians should cause no unnecessary harm to the patient. However, “physicians may feel that without full authority to make decisions, he or she should not assume responsibility for outcomes.” Without the authority from their own point of view, physicians cannot make decisions. If they had to ask the patient what kind of treatment he or she wants then it is hard for doctors to determine what cure is right for the patient. The doctors also said that life is valuable for them to save his life, but they still should have listened to Dax. Not only the doctors were correct from their point of view, but also Dax’s requests for dying should have been heard. He also should have equal rights to make …show more content…
Because this relates to beneficence is that the doctors made sure that she needs to be forced fed. The physicians had to do their job and make the patient healthy to live longer. Even the court had denied to listen to Elizabeth request to starve to death, so they had told the physicians to force-feed her. However, it tortured her. Beneficence means that as a physician, the patient needs to be benefited, but it was not benefiting Elizabeth. It was more of torturing and harming

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Hippocratic Oath is one of the oldest binding documents in history. It was written by the physician Hippocrates and despite being written centuries ago, many doctors still take the oath and use it to guide them in the ethical practice of medicine. It states “First do no harm.” Throughout history, doctors has done as much as they can to treat and keep their patients as comfortable as humanly possible. But this line of reason begins to blur with the issue of physician assisted suicide.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cowart Case Summary

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    But I strongly believe that if the doctor would of given Cowart more pain medication, which was afterwards determined they could have given him more, then it is quite possible that Cowart would not have had this intense craving and desire to die nor will he have had a strong opinion on patient autonomy. But at the same time you can’t blame the doctors, although yes Cowart strongly believes in patient autonomy, but Cowart had been brought to the hospital through the…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt, each of these men agree that competent patients have this privilege; however, they do not agree on when the patient has the right to use this privilege. Cowart’s argument favors healthcare professionals allowing patients to use their free will at any given moment regardless of the positive or negative outcomes of his or her decision. I agree with Cowart’s argument pertaining to the rights of patients. Cowart discusses how patient autonomy…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to clearly understand the issue regarding opinions of a physician’s duty, one can refer to the case of French doctor Nicolas Bonnemaison. The doctor was “accused of killing” seven terminally ill patients and convicted of killing one. Despite facing a potential life in prison, his condemnation was adjourned as the judge ruled that his actions had good intentions- and therefore, he was not a murderer. Bonnemaison’s case is an excellent representation of how the differing beliefs work, or don’t work, together; he was clearly in favour of the practice of euthanasia due to his belief that it was showing the patients mercy, the high court were following the law by opposing the practice and viewing it as murder, and the prosecutors were in…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I remember one time, when I was in the hospital doing an internship, there was this patient that was on her deathbed. I remember her saying she did not want to live anymore. On that day the elderly patient, who was in the Intensive Care Unit breathing her last breath, was slowly allowed to die. This was about two years ago and I’ve never forgotten that moment. I was told that day that sometimes you have to let the patient pass.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine the following scenario: You have just been diagnosed with a severe illness. Your doctor tells you that without treatment, you will die soon. Then he tells you about a certain treatment that might delay the spread of the disease, giving you longer to live. The catch is that the treatment is expensive. You don’t want to die, so you contact your insurance provider to see if they will cover the cost of the treatment.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dax Cowart Case Study

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First and foremost, it is important to recognize that past decisions should not be justified with future knowledge. There are many hypothetical situations and what-if statements that can help with future decision-making, but the "all's well ends well" logic fails because a good future cannot be guaranteed. The biggest problem that Dax Cowart faced was the fact that his pain was not controlled and in his words "one hour was an eternity, with the pain I was going through". To focus on other hypothetical situations, such as "what if your pain was controlled?", what if you had better support?", or as Dr. Burt puts it "how realistic were your expectations?" detracts from the immediate issue of is it more humane to allow a patient in agony to die, or to persuade him or her to continue…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An individual’s principle of autonomy with regards to healthcare reiterates and serves as a reminder to us that every person has the aptitude and the right to make his or her own decisions based on their personal values, beliefs, background and standards. Autonomy is frequently defined in a number of ways, however, the common theme on these definitions refer to persons having the capacity to reason and make their own decisions (Elliott, 2001). In my opinion, the principle of autonomy does not automatically empower a person to do something that is harmful to oneself and just as important, to others. However, in cases of end-of-life care which we’ll consider as the harmful action, do we grant this individual his right of self-determination if…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All in all, it makes me remember to the situation of my friend’s grandmother who had cancer. After treatment a lot with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, she decided to give up. For her, it was excruciating, so she did not want to continue the treatment. Nonetheless, the doctor determined that her choice should not be accepted because he felt that if she continues to cure her disease, it will improve. As can be seen, the principle of autonomy often comes into conflict with the principle of beneficence.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is described as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease, or someone in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia is considered illegal in some countries, but in the United States Euthanasia is legal in most states. Euthanasia is often confused with Physician Aid in dying or PAD but the difference between the two comes down to who performs the act in Euthanasia a doctor administers the medicine, but in physician aid in dying is when a person gives themselves the medicine in order to die along with the help or supervision of a doctor. So should Euthanasia be legalized in all states?…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea that medicine can override the parent’s decision to refuse medicine to heal their child is justified through the principles of beneficence, justice, and paternalism. According to the principle of beneficence, it supports decisions that are made to relieve a patient form any harm. The medicine given will promote the health and well-being of the child and minimize his suffering and pain. Here, the duty of beneficence requires that the physician intervene on behalf of saving the patient's life in belief that the parents are not acting in their best interest for the child. Following the principle of beneficence, paternalism demands for decisions to be overridden when a patient’s autonomy has been compromised.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is the case because decision making leads to judgment from Christianity, society and law enforcement. Medical organizations want to ensure that decisions made will lead to good consequences, efficient individuals, and positive actions. The decision to withdraw treatment will result to angry patients, low hospital ratings, unhappy community, and a high percentage of deaths. The decision to continue treatment will lead to a happy community, longer life, motivated health care team, and higher hospital rating. Hence, the result of judgment will motivate health care personnel to make better decisions.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Beneficence is preventing harm and promoting good. This basically means that both you and the patient are benefitting due to not causing any harm to the patient and the nurse doing their job as well. Also in working with the patient you have to be well acquainted with their beliefs, cultures and values. Belief is trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They do so by informing, guiding, advising, and helping them make appropriate choices on how to deal with their illness (Gardiner). Typically, a patients’ upbringing, personal priorities, the community where they live, and/or their faith frequently influences them to make decisions against the professional judgement of the doctor. When a specific case arises in which the patient’s life may be at risk and he or she denies the treatment, the moral burden that it would put on the doctor would be tremendous…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays