Collapse of the French Monarchy Essay

2836 Words 12 Pages
Why did the French Monarchy collapse in 1792?

In order to begin to answer this question it is necessary to first return to the Estates General of 1789. Although the body had not been convened since 1641, over 150 years prior, Louis XVI was not prepared to allow for any significant change in procedure; in November of 1788, the king had granted double representation for the Third Estate but also upheld voting by orders. Under such a system, the first and second estates had the happy fortune to be always in the majority, as most of the upper echelons of the Catholic Church were made up of nobles. As such, despite their overwhelming majority, both in the meeting halls of the Estates General and throughout the country, the commons had little
…show more content…
Three days later, the deputies of the Third Estate, having been locked out of the Estates-General meeting hall in Versailles, joined together in an empty tennis court. Here, they swore an oath expressing their commitment to creating a written constitution and restating their determination to remain indivisible. The King responded to this, addressing the deputies in a ‘royal session’ on June 23 during which he rejected the notion that the Third Estate could constitute a National Assembly and insisted that every deputy represented only the order by whom he had been elected. He did make one concession however; on matters which affected all three orders, particularly those concerning royal fiscal policy, all the representatives would be permitted to debate in common.

The King put forward several reforms relating to taxation and expressed his willingness to sanction the decision of the upper estates to forgo their financial privileges, as advocated by Calonne the previous year. The King concluded by reminding his opponents of his position; the law comes from him, and as such must meet his approval. This attitude made it seem as though these reforms were suggested reluctantly and not out of good will, thereby adding to their poor reception and bolstering the insistence of the National Assembly that they were tokenry and did not go nearly far enough. The

Related Documents