Register to read the introduction…
Organizations posses a lot of information, including strategic plans, trade secrets, cost information, legal documents, and process improvements. Of course, preserving the confidentiality the organization’s intellectual property is the basic objective of information security. Protecting the privacy of their customers’ information is also equally important. That means a company and its management team is also responsible in protecting confidentiality and in implementing privacy controls. If they fail in these roles as well as the roles enumerated above, they should be held accountable for the failure or for the successful attack made on their AIS.
Therefore, as the above analysis shows, a company and its management team should be held liable for losses sustained in a successful attack made on their …show more content…
Therefore, the federal government should have deciding and enforcing remedies and punishment in such cases. There are also some other privacy related regulations. These regulations were passed by Congress in order to protect privacy violations and in response to accounting information system attacks.
In addition to the CAN-SPAM Act discussed above, a number of federal regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and the Financial Service Modernization Act impose specific requirements on organizations to protect the privacy of their customers’ personal information (Romney & Steinbart, 2012). Therefore, these are some of the other cases where the federal government should have deciding and enforcing remedies and punishment with regard to violations in accounting information system.
Evaluation of AIS (with Respect to
Therefore, as the above analysis shows, a company and its management team should be held liable for losses sustained in a successful attack made on their …show more content…
Therefore, the federal government should have deciding and enforcing remedies and punishment in such cases. There are also some other privacy related regulations. These regulations were passed by Congress in order to protect privacy violations and in response to accounting information system attacks.
In addition to the CAN-SPAM Act discussed above, a number of federal regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and the Financial Service Modernization Act impose specific requirements on organizations to protect the privacy of their customers’ personal information (Romney & Steinbart, 2012). Therefore, these are some of the other cases where the federal government should have deciding and enforcing remedies and punishment with regard to violations in accounting information system.
Evaluation of AIS (with Respect to