Many people believe race plays a big …show more content…
Many different things could go wrong while analysing DNA, such as cross-contamination. Ira Flatlow discussed in an interview that “sampling techniques are changing, so the standard for using DNA evidence should be changing, too.” At a crime scene, you could find fibers, hairs, and maybe even blood that has absolutely nothing to do with the crime that was committed. Someone could use things that has a person’s DNA to plant at a crime scene and have them framed. As crazy as it sounds, it happens. Amanda Knox is a good example of this. A knife was contaminated with her DNA, which was used against her in court. Luckily, specialists were able to detect this and have her name cleared (Lowery et al). Another thing about DNA is that it’s not always accurate or completely guaranteed. Matching DNA from a crime scene to the DNA of a suspect doesn’t mean that person is guilty (Harris). We need to take more steps into ensuring that DNA is handled properly so that innocent people don’t have to suffer. Our justice system needs to do a better job of making sure that things aren’t being contaminated, people aren’t being framed, or anything else isn’t going wrong with DNA being used to incarcerate someone. A person’s life is at risk, this issue should be more