Firstly, footprints, blood, hair strand, and saliva are adequate to determine the criminal or victim, making DNA fingerprinting less invasive. Secondly, just from blood, hair, and saliva, DNA can be achieved than to extract blood from someone who is uncomfortable to do so or is not present at the crime scene. Thirdly, it can effectively reduce wrongful convictions of innocent people because DNA is highly accurate since it is not easy to be tampered with. Fourthly, it is an easier process to solve crimes either from the past or recently in a short amount of time. It usually takes several days to analyze the DNA samples. Lastly, it is useful in criminal cases where the victim is disfigured or when there is no visual representation of the criminal. A single hair or a drop of blood is enough to identify who they are. DNA fingerprinting may be highly used in crime cases, but it has some flaws to it. Firstly, some people consider it to be a violation of the privacy law. Not everyone is comfortable about their DNA information being gathered. There are some people who are cautious about having their DNA information collected as it could violate their privacy. There are times when innocent individuals may be forced to have their DNA gathered. Secondly, once the DNA information is stored in the database, there is no possible way of removing it. Thirdly, it raises concerns from critics due to the access of the DNA database by businesses and organizations such as health care providers, insurance carriers, and some employers. Some people are not comfortable that a stranger has access to their DNA’s identity. Furthermore, it can be used in a false way to imprison innocents. Hair strands and saliva can be easily gathered. The DNA profiles can be of innocent people who just happen to be there at
Firstly, footprints, blood, hair strand, and saliva are adequate to determine the criminal or victim, making DNA fingerprinting less invasive. Secondly, just from blood, hair, and saliva, DNA can be achieved than to extract blood from someone who is uncomfortable to do so or is not present at the crime scene. Thirdly, it can effectively reduce wrongful convictions of innocent people because DNA is highly accurate since it is not easy to be tampered with. Fourthly, it is an easier process to solve crimes either from the past or recently in a short amount of time. It usually takes several days to analyze the DNA samples. Lastly, it is useful in criminal cases where the victim is disfigured or when there is no visual representation of the criminal. A single hair or a drop of blood is enough to identify who they are. DNA fingerprinting may be highly used in crime cases, but it has some flaws to it. Firstly, some people consider it to be a violation of the privacy law. Not everyone is comfortable about their DNA information being gathered. There are some people who are cautious about having their DNA information collected as it could violate their privacy. There are times when innocent individuals may be forced to have their DNA gathered. Secondly, once the DNA information is stored in the database, there is no possible way of removing it. Thirdly, it raises concerns from critics due to the access of the DNA database by businesses and organizations such as health care providers, insurance carriers, and some employers. Some people are not comfortable that a stranger has access to their DNA’s identity. Furthermore, it can be used in a false way to imprison innocents. Hair strands and saliva can be easily gathered. The DNA profiles can be of innocent people who just happen to be there at